Emerging Trends in Sample Preparation and Analysis of Nanomaterials as Environmental Contaminants

Liva Palmisano^*
*Correspondence: Liva Palmisano, Department of Chemistry, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Email:

Introduction

Nanomaterials, due to their unique physicochemical properties, are increasingly being used in various industrial applications, ranging from electronics and medicine to environmental remediation. However, their widespread use has raised concerns about their potential impact on the environment and human health. Consequently, the analysis and monitoring of nanomaterials as environmental contaminants have become critical. This article explores the emerging trends in sample preparation and analysis techniques for detecting and characterizing nanomaterials in environmental matrices. Sample preparation is a crucial step in the accurate analysis of nanomaterials in complex environmental samples. Traditional methods often fall short in isolating and concentrating nanomaterials without altering their properties. Recent advancements have introduced more efficient and reliable techniques.

SPE has been enhanced with the use of functionalized sorbents that selectively bind to nanomaterials, allowing for their effective isolation from environmental samples such as water, soil, and air. This technique employs membranes with pore sizes that can retain nanoparticles while allowing smaller molecules to pass through. Advances in membrane technology have improved the efficiency and selectivity of ultrafiltration processes. CPE utilizes the phase separation phenomenon of non-ionic surfactants to pre concentrate nanomaterials from aqueous samples. This method has gained attention for its simplicity, low cost, and environmental friendliness. The characterization and quantification of nanomaterials require advanced analytical techniques capable of providing detailed information about their size, shape, composition, and surface properties [1].

Description

Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) is a versatile and widely used technique in the preparation of environmental samples for the analysis of nanomaterials. It involves passing a liquid sample through a column or cartridge packed with a solid sorbent material that selectively adsorbs the target analytes. The choice of sorbent material is critical and can be tailored to interact specifically with nanomaterials based on their unique physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, and surface chemistry. Once the nanomaterials are retained on the sorbent, they can be eluted with a suitable solvent for subsequent analysis. SPE offers several advantages, including high selectivity, concentration of analytes, and the ability to process large sample volumes, making it an essential tool for isolating and pre concentrating nanomaterials from complex environmental matrices like water, soil, and air. Recent advancements in SPE have focused on developing functionalized sorbents that enhance the efficiency and specificity of nanomaterial extraction, thereby improving the reliability and accuracy of environmental monitoring efforts [2].

Ultrafiltration is a membrane-based separation technique widely used in the sample preparation of nanomaterials, especially in environmental analysis. This method employs semi-permeable membranes with pore sizes typically ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers, which are designed to retain nanoparticles while allowing smaller molecules and ions to pass through. Ultrafiltration is particularly effective for concentrating nanomaterials from large volumes of aqueous samples, such as water from rivers, lakes, or wastewater treatment plants. The process is driven by pressure, which forces the sample through the membrane, leaving the nanoparticles concentrated on the retentate side. One of the key advantages of ultrafiltration is its ability to separate nanoparticles based on size without altering their chemical composition or properties. Recent advancements in membrane technology have led to the development of more selective and durable membranes, enhancing the efficiency and specificity of ultrafiltration for environmental applications. This technique is crucial for isolating nanoparticles for subsequent analysis, facilitating accurate assessment of their presence and behavior in various environmental matrices [3].

Cloud Point Extraction (CPE) is an innovative and environmentally friendly sample preparation technique that has gained prominence in the analysis of nanomaterials in environmental samples. CPE utilizes the unique phase separation behavior of non-ionic surfactants, which, upon reaching a specific temperature known as the cloud point, form micellar aggregates that can selectively solubilize and concentrate nanomaterials from aqueous solutions. This method is advantageous due to its simplicity, low cost, and minimal use of organic solvents, making it an eco-friendly alternative to traditional extraction techniques. In CPE, the sample is mixed with the surfactant and heated to the cloud point, causing the nanomaterials to partition into the micelle-rich phase. This phase can then be separated and analyzed for nanomaterial content. Recent advancements in CPE have focused on optimizing surfactant formulations and extraction conditions to enhance selectivity and efficiency, making it a robust tool for pre concentrating nanomaterials from complex environmental matrices such as water, soil, and biological samples. This technique is particularly valuable for its ability to concentrate trace levels of nanomaterials, thereby improving the sensitivity and accuracy of subsequent analytical measurements [4].

spICP-MS is a powerful technique for detecting and sizing individual nanoparticles in complex matrices. It offers high sensitivity and the ability to provide quantitative information about particle concentration and size distribution. FFF separates nanoparticles based on their size and shape using a flow field. When coupled with detectors like ICP-MS or UV-Vis spectroscopy, FFF provides comprehensive information about the physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) remain indispensable for visualizing nanomaterials at high resolution. Recent developments in EM techniques, such as cryo-EM, have enhanced the ability to study nanomaterials in their native state. To address the complexity of environmental samples and the diverse nature of nanomaterials, the integration of multiple analytical techniques has become a prominent trend. Coupling methods like FFF with spICP-MS or combining spectroscopy with electron microscopy allows for a more comprehensive characterization of nanomaterials. Such integrated approaches provide synergistic benefits, improving the reliability and depth of analysis.

The analysis of nanomaterials generates large datasets that require advanced data handling and interpretation techniques. Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are increasingly being employed to process and interpret complex data, identify patterns, and make accurate predictions about the behavior and fate of nanomaterials in the environment. These technologies are instrumental in managing the vast amount of information generated by high-throughput analytical techniques. As the understanding of nanomaterials as environmental contaminants evolves, so do the regulatory and standardization efforts. International organizations and regulatory bodies are working towards establishing guidelines and standardized protocols for the analysis of nanomaterials. These efforts aim to ensure the reliability, reproducibility, and comparability of data across different studies and laboratories [5].

Conclusion

The detection and analysis of nanomaterials as environmental contaminants are rapidly evolving fields, driven by the need to understand their impact on ecosystems and human health. Advances in sample preparation, analytical techniques, data interpretation, and regulatory frameworks are collectively enhancing our ability to monitor and mitigate the risks associated with nanomaterials. Continued innovation and collaboration across scientific disciplines will be essential in addressing the challenges posed by nanomaterials and safeguarding environmental quality.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Bayda, Samer, Muhammad Adeel, Tiziano Tuccinardi and Marco Cordani, et al. "The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: from chemical–physical applications to nanomedicine." Molecules 25 (2019): 112.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Eldar-Boock, Anat, Dina Polyak, Anna Scomparin and Ronit Satchi-Fainaro. "Nano-sized polymers and liposomes designed to deliver combination therapy for cancer." Curr Opin Biotechnol 24 (2013): 682-689.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Demirel, Melik, Atul Parikh, Vincent Crespi and Scott Reed. "Biologically Inspired Nanomaterials: A Conference Report." arXiv preprint arXiv: 0708.0164 (2007).

Google Scholar

4. Xiao, Yiting, Yang Tian, Wenbo Xu and Jun Zhu. "Photodegradation of microplastics through nanomaterials: Insights into photocatalysts modification and detailed mechanisms." Mater 17 (2024): 2755.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Häder, Donat-P, Anastazia T. Banaszak, Virginia E. Villafañe and Maite A. Narvarte, et al. "Anthropogenic pollution of aquatic ecosystems: Emerging problems with global implications." Sci Total Environ 713 (2020): 136586.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at