GET THE APP

Energy-efficient Designs in Robotics: Extending Operational Lifetimes for Autonomous Systems
..

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology

ISSN: 0974-7230

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 5

Energy-efficient Designs in Robotics: Extending Operational Lifetimes for Autonomous Systems

Baez Elian*
*Correspondence: Baez Elian, Department of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SX, Scotland, UK, Email:
Department of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SX, Scotland, UK

Received: 26-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. jcsb-24-151090; Editor assigned: 28-Aug-2024, Pre QC No. P-151090; Reviewed: 09-Sep-2024, QC No. Q-151090; Revised: 16-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. R-151090; Published: 23-Sep-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/0974-7230.2024.17.542
Citation: Elian, Baez. “Energy-efficient Designs in Robotics: Extending Operational Lifetimes for Autonomous Systems.” J Comput Sci Syst Biol 17 (2024): 542.
Copyright: © 2024 Elian B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

As robotics technology advances, the demand for energy-efficient designs becomes increasingly crucial. Autonomous systems, including drones, mobile robots and robotic arms, rely heavily on energy resources to operate effectively. This paper explores various strategies for enhancing energy efficiency in robotics, focusing on design optimization, energy management and innovative materials. By implementing these strategies, we can significantly extend the operational lifetimes of autonomous systems, promoting sustainability and reducing operational costs. The field of robotics has seen rapid advancements in recent years, with autonomous systems being deployed in various sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, agriculture and logistics. However, the performance of these systems is often limited by their energy sources. The need for longer operational times without frequent recharging or battery replacement is paramount, particularly for applications in remote or hazardous environments. This article reviews the latest developments in energy-efficient designs, highlighting their importance in extending the operational lifetimes of autonomous systems [1].

Description

Energy consumption in robotics

Robotic systems consume energy primarily for motion, sensing, computation and communication. The energy consumption can be classified into two main categories [2]:

  1. Static energy consumption: This includes energy used for processing and maintaining system readiness, such as keeping sensors activated or processing data.
  2. Dynamic energy consumption: This encompasses energy expended during movement and operation of actuators.

Understanding these categories is essential for developing strategies to minimize energy use and enhance overall system efficiency.

Strategies for energy efficiency

a. Lightweight materials: The weight of a robotic system directly impacts its energy consumption. Using lightweight materials, such as carbon fiber, aluminum alloys, or advanced polymers, can significantly reduce the energy required for movement.

b. Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic shapes: For aerial and aquatic robots, optimizing shapes to reduce drag can lead to substantial energy savings. Streamlined designs decrease air or water resistance, allowing robots to operate efficiently over extended periods [3].

c. Modular designs: Modular robots can adapt their configurations based on task requirements, allowing them to conserve energy when full functionality is unnecessary. For instance, a robotic arm can detach certain modules during idle periods to save power.

a. Adaptive energy control: Implementing adaptive energy management systems enables robots to adjust their energy consumption based on environmental conditions and operational demands. For example, robots can enter low-power modes when performing non-critical tasks, conserving energy without compromising performance [4].

b. Predictive algorithms: Using predictive algorithms to forecast energy needs based on historical data allows robots to optimize their energy usage dynamically. Such algorithms can anticipate peak loads and adjust operations to ensure energy-efficient performance.

a. Energy harvesting: Energy harvesting technologies, such as solar cells, piezoelectric materials, or thermoelectric generators, can supplement traditional power sources. By capturing energy from the environment, robots can extend their operational lifetimes significantly.

b. Advanced Battery technologies: Investing in research and development of advanced battery technologies, such as lithium-sulfur or solid-state batteries, can lead to longer-lasting energy sources. These technologies promise higher energy densities and longer cycle lives compared to conventional lithium-ion batteries [5].

Despite advancements, several challenges remain in implementing energy-efficient designs in robotics:

  • Trade-offs between performance and efficiency: Enhancing energy efficiency may compromise the performance of certain tasks. Future designs will need to balance these aspects effectively.
  • Integration of new technologies: Adopting new materials and power sources can increase manufacturing costs and complexity. Research into cost-effective solutions is vital.
  • Standardization and scalability: Developing standardized energy-efficient designs will enable scalability across various robotic applications, making these advancements accessible to a broader range of users.

Conclusion

Energy-efficient designs are essential for extending the operational lifetimes of autonomous systems in robotics. By focusing on lightweight materials, design optimization, energy management and innovative power sources, we can significantly enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of robotic technologies. As the field continues to evolve, ongoing research and development will be crucial in overcoming existing challenges and unlocking the full potential of energy-efficient robotics.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Tang, Wei, Lijian Wang, Jiawei Gu and Yunfeng Gu, et al. "Single neural adaptive PID control for small UAV micro-turbojet engine." Sensors 20 (2020): 345.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Huang, Guang-Bin, Qin-Yu Zhu and Chee-Kheong Siew. "Real-time learning capability of neural networks." Neural Netw 17 (2024): 863-878.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Karalekas, Georgios, Stavros Vologiannidis and John Kalomiros. "Europa: A case study for teaching sensors, data acquisition and robotics via a ROS-based educational robot." Sensors 20 (2020): 2469.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Hao, Qian, Zhaoba Wang, Junzheng Wang and Guangrong Chen, et al. "Stability-guaranteed and high terrain adaptability static gait for quadruped robots." Sensors 20 (2020): 4911.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Saleem, Omer, Jamshed Iqbal and Muhammad Shahzad Afzal. "A robust variable-structure LQI controller for under-actuated systems via flexible online adaptation of performance-index weights." Plos one 18 (2023): e0283079.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2279

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology received 2279 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward