GET THE APP

Environmental and Societal Costs of Wildlife-vehicle Collisions
..

Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

ISSN: 2332-2543

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 12, Issue 2

Environmental and Societal Costs of Wildlife-vehicle Collisions

Spieske Suklan*
*Correspondence: Spieske Suklan, Department of Biodiversity, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79074-460, Brazil, Email:
Department of Biodiversity, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79074-460, Brazil

Received: 02-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. jbes-24-133538; Editor assigned: 04-Mar-2024, Pre QC No. P-133538; Reviewed: 15-Mar-2024, QC No. Q-133538; Revised: 20-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. R-133538; Published: 27-Mar-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2332-2543.2024.12.529
Citation: Suklan, Spieske. “Environmental and Societal Costs of Wildlife-vehicle Collisions.” J Biodivers Endanger Species 12 (2024): 529.
Copyright: ©2024 Suklan S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions (WVCs) are a growing concern worldwide, leading to significant environmental and societal costs. This article explores the impact of WVCs on wildlife populations, ecosystems, human health and economies. It examines the causes of these collisions, such as habitat fragmentation, urban expansion and increased traffic. Furthermore, the article discusses the societal costs, including human fatalities, vehicle damage and healthcare expenses. Additionally, it highlights mitigation strategies, such as wildlife corridors, overpasses and public awareness campaigns, that aim to reduce WVCs. The article underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches to address the complex nature of WVCs and the importance of collaborative efforts between environmentalists, transportation authorities and policymakers to mitigate their impact [1].

Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs) pose a significant threat to both wildlife and human populations. As human development encroaches upon natural habitats, the frequency of these collisions increases. This article examines the environmental and societal costs of WVCs and explores various mitigation strategies to address the problem. WVCs have far-reaching effects on ecosystems. Many wildlife species, especially large mammals like deer, moose and bears, are frequently involved in collisions. These incidents can lead to population declines and disrupt local ecosystems, causing cascading effects throughout the food chain. The loss of apex predators, for instance, can lead to overpopulation of herbivores, impacting vegetation and other wildlife. Habitat fragmentation, often caused by road construction, is a key factor in the increase of WVCs. As roads divide wildlife habitats, animals are forced to cross them, resulting in more frequent collisions. This fragmentation also limits gene flow among wildlife populations, leading to reduced genetic diversity and resilience [2].

Description

The societal costs of WVCs are substantial. In addition to the loss of wildlife, these collisions result in significant human fatalities and injuries. According to various studies, thousands of people die and many more are injured each year due to WVCs. The economic costs are also considerable, including vehicle damage, healthcare expenses and insurance claims. Additionally, there are indirect costs such as traffic delays and road maintenance due to collision-related damage. Wildlife corridors and overpasses structures allow wildlife to cross roads safely, reducing collisions. Studies show that they can significantly lower WVC rates. Educating drivers about WVC risks and encouraging safe driving practices can help reduce collisions. Innovations such as animal detection systems and smart road signs can alert drivers to the presence of wildlife on roads [3].

Wildlife-vehicle collisions represent a significant challenge with both environmental and societal costs. Addressing this issue requires a collaborative approach, involving transportation authorities, environmentalists and policymakers. By implementing effective mitigation strategies, it is possible to reduce the impact of WVCs, thereby protecting wildlife and enhancing road safety. The ongoing commitment to research and innovation will play a crucial role in finding solutions to this complex problem. Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions (WVCs) represent a growing problem with significant impacts on both environmental ecosystems and societal structures. This extended article delves deeper into the complexities of these collisions, exploring the broader implications on biodiversity, community safety and economic stability. Through comprehensive analysis, we aim to illustrate the multifaceted consequences of WVCs and discuss how coordinated efforts can reduce their frequency and severity.

Wildlife-vehicle collisions disrupt ecosystems by reducing wildlife populations and altering natural behaviors. For many species, roads act as barriers that fragment their habitat. This fragmentation forces wildlife to navigate unfamiliar territory, often leading to dangerous crossings and collisions with vehicles. The loss of wildlife disrupts the balance within ecosystems, potentially leading to long-term ecological shifts. For example, the reduction in predator populations due to WVCs can cause herbivore numbers to increase, leading to overgrazing and vegetation loss. This not only affects plant species but also influences soil health and water quality. Additionally, the decline of keystone species can disrupt entire food chains, causing ripple effects throughout the ecosystem [4].

WVCs have a direct impact on human safety and community well-being. They are responsible for thousands of injuries and fatalities each year, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems. In addition, the damage to vehicles results in considerable financial costs due to repairs and insurance claims. These expenses extend to local governments, which must allocate resources to road repairs, traffic management and emergency response. The economic consequences also extend to broader industries. WVCs can cause traffic congestion and delays, impacting business operations and supply chains. The tourism industry can also suffer, as scenic roads may become less appealing due to safety concerns. The challenge of reducing WVCs requires a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from transportation planning, wildlife biology and community engagement. Building wildlife crossings, underpasses and fencing to guide animals away from roads has proven effective in reducing WVCs. These structures create safe passages for wildlife, allowing them to move freely without risking collisions [5].

Conclusion

Advanced technologies such as infrared cameras, motion sensors and warning systems can alert drivers to the presence of wildlife near roads. These systems can significantly reduce the risk of collisions, especially in high-traffic areas. Raising public awareness about WVC risks and promoting safe driving practices can contribute to reducing collisions. Community-led initiatives can also play a role in developing localized solutions to WVCs. As urban expansion continues and road networks grow, the threat of WVCs will likely persist. Bringing together experts from different fields to study the impact of WVCs and develop new mitigation techniques. Encouraging governments to adopt policies that prioritize wildlife protection and road safety. Sharing knowledge and best practices across borders to create a global approach to reducing WVCs.

Wildlife-vehicle collisions pose significant environmental and societal costs, with impacts on biodiversity, human safety and economic stability. Addressing this issue requires a holistic approach that combines infrastructure improvements, technological innovations and community engagement. By working together, we can reduce the frequency and severity of WVCs, promoting a safer environment for both wildlife and people.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Kumar, Sarvesh, Arvind Darshna and Deepak Ranjan. "A review of literature on the integration of green energy and circular economy." Heliyon (2023).
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Segreto, Marco, Lucas Principe, Alexandra Desormeaux and Marco Torre, et al. "Trends in social acceptance of renewable energy across Europe-a literature review." Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (2020): 9161.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Abdar, Moloud, Mohammad Ehsan Basiri, Junjun Yin and Mahmoud Habibnezhad, et al. "Energy choices in Alaska: Mining people's perception and attitudes from geotagged tweets." Renew Sustain Energy Rev 124 (2020): 109781.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Shahzad, Aamir, Kaiwen Zhang and Abdelouahed Gherbi. "Intuitive development to examine collaborative iot supply chain system underlying privacy and security levels and perspective powering through proactive blockchain." Sensors 20 (2020): 3760.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Belhadi, Amine, Venkatesh Mani, Sachin S. Kamble and Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, et al. "Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation." Ann Oper Res 333 (2024): 627-652.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 624

Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species received 624 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward