Environmental Consequences of Waste Disposal: Landfilling vs. Incineration

Breanna Audrey^*
*Correspondence: Breanna Audrey, Department of Environmental Science and Policy (ESP), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy, Email:

Introduction

Waste disposal is an essential but often overlooked part of modern society. As urbanization increases and consumption rates climb, the need for effective waste management systems grows ever more pressing. Two of the most widely used waste disposal methods are landfilling and incineration. While both serve the same purpose getting rid of waste the environmental consequences of each method are starkly different. Understanding the ecological impact of these practices is crucial as we seek to mitigate their harmful effects on the planet. Landfills have long been a primary method for waste disposal [1]. They involve burying waste materials in the ground, typically in large, designated areas. Though landfills have evolved over time to minimize risks, they still pose significant environmental challenges. The most concerning environmental impact of landfills is the production of greenhouse gases, particularly methane (CH₄). When organic waste, such as food scraps, paper and yard waste, decomposes anaerobically (without oxygen) in a landfill, it produces methane. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential over 25 times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. Despite modern landfills being equipped with methane capture systems, a significant amount of methane still escapes into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Landfills are notorious for leaching harmful substances into the surrounding environment. As rainwater filters through the waste, it can pick up toxic chemicals, heavy metals and hazardous materials, creating what is known as "landfill leachate." If not properly managed, this leachate can contaminate nearby soil and water sources, posing serious risks to ecosystems and human health. Modern landfills are designed with liners and leachate collection systems to minimize this risk, but older landfills without these protections continue to pose a threat [2].

Description

The creation and maintenance of landfills require large areas of land. These sites often encroach on natural habitats, leading to the destruction of ecosystems and biodiversity loss. Additionally, once a landfill is full and closed, the land may be unsuitable for other uses for many years. While some closed landfills are repurposed for recreational areas or parks, the environmental cost of this land transformation remains significant. Though not always directly tied to ecological health, landfills are also known for creating unpleasant odors and visual blight. Local communities may experience lower quality of life due to the proximity of large landfill sites, which can lead to social unrest and health issues. Incineration is a waste disposal method that involves burning waste at high temperatures, converting it into ash, gases and heat. While it can reduce the volume of waste and generate energy, incineration has its own set of environmental consequences. One of the most significant environmental drawbacks of incineration is air pollution. When waste is burned, it releases a range of pollutants into the atmosphere, including particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO). These emissions can contribute to respiratory problems, acid rain and smog formation. Additionally, incinerating certain materials like plastics can release toxic compounds such as dioxins and furans, which are persistent environmental pollutants and carcinogenic [3].

While incineration does reduce the volume of waste, it still generates significant greenhouse gas emissions. The combustion process releases carbon dioxide (CO₂) and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Moreover, the burning of waste containing plastic or other fossil-fuel-based materials can contribute to the release of additional carbon-based pollutants. Incinerators produce ash as a byproduct of burning waste. This ash often contains heavy metals, such as mercury, lead and cadmium, which can be harmful if not properly managed. Depending on its composition, this ash may need to be disposed of in a hazardous waste facility, further complicating waste management. If not adequately controlled, the disposal of incinerator ash can result in soil and water contamination. Though modern incinerators often capture heat for energy production, the overall energy efficiency of incineration can be low compared to other renewable energy sources. Additionally, burning waste for energy can be counterproductive if it discourages recycling or reduces the incentive to develop more sustainable waste management practices [4].

Landfills produce significant methane emissions, a powerful greenhouse gas, making them a significant contributor to climate change. However, methane capture systems have helped mitigate this impact to some extent. Incineration, while producing fewer greenhouse gases than landfills in terms of methane, still emits carbon dioxide and other pollutants, contributing to global warming. Landfills contribute to pollution primarily through leachate, which can contaminate soil and water and by emitting methane. Incineration, on the other hand, primarily contributes to air pollution through the release of toxic gases and particulate matter, along with the hazardous ash produced. Landfilling offers little opportunity for resource recovery. Once buried, materials like metals, plastics and other recyclables are lost. Incineration, in contrast, has the potential to recover energy, but it still results in the loss of recyclable materials and the burning process can degrade the quality of certain materials, making them harder to recycle in the future [5].

Conclusion

The environmental consequences of landfilling and incineration are complex and neither method is without its drawbacks. Landfills contribute to climate change, pollution and habitat destruction, while incineration can lead to air pollution and toxic ash disposal problems. Ultimately, the best approach may be a combination of both methods, complemented by robust recycling programs and waste reduction strategies. Ideally, society should prioritize reducing waste at the source—encouraging recycling, reusing and reducing consumption. While landfills and incinerators serve as necessary tools for waste management, their long-term environmental impacts highlight the importance of a circular economy, where materials are reused and the need for waste disposal is minimized. As we continue to explore sustainable solutions, improving waste management practices, increasing recycling rates and investing in innovative technologies for waste-to-energy conversion will be crucial steps toward a greener, more sustainable future.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Arrieta, Marina Patricia, María Dolores Samper, Miguel Aldas and Juan López, et al. "On the use of PLA-PHB blends for sustainable food packaging applications." Materials 10 (2017): 1008.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Laohavisuti, Nongnuch, Banjong Boonchom, Wimonmat Boonmee and Kittichai Chaiseeda, et al. "Simple recycling of biowaste eggshells to various calcium phosphates for specific industries." Sci Rep 11 (2021): 15143.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Walkiewicz, Joanna, Jakub Kawalerczyk, Radosław Mirski and Dorota Dziurka, et al. "The application of various bark species as a fillers for UF resin in plywood manufacturing." Materials 15 (2022): 7201. 

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Kreuger, Emma, Ivo Achu Nges and Lovisa Björnsson. "Ensiling of crops for biogas production: Effects on methane yield and total solids determination." Biotechnol Biofuels 4 (2011): 1-8.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Lay, J.J., Y.Y. Li and T. Noike. "Effect of moisture content and of chemical fermentation nature on methane characteristics solid wastes." J Environ Syst Eng 1 (1996): 101-108.

   Google Scholar