Environmental Toxicity and Rodent Models: Investigating the Impact on Human Health

Sumadi Anwar^*
*Correspondence: Sumadi Anwar, Department of Surgery, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandropoulos, Greece, Email:

Introduction

Environmental toxicity, resulting from exposure to various pollutants and contaminants, has become a significant concern in modern society. These environmental stressors can lead to a wide range of health problems in humans, including chronic diseases, developmental issues, and even cancer. To understand the impact of environmental toxins on human health, scientists often turn to rodent models for research. These models, usually mice and rats, offer a valuable means of investigating the effects of environmental toxins and developing strategies to mitigate them. In this essay, we will explore the critical role of rodent models in studying environmental toxicity and its implications for human health.

Description

Environmental toxicity refers to the harmful effects of various substances present in the environment, such as air and water pollutants, heavy metals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals. These toxins can enter the human body through multiple routes, including inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption. Upon exposure, they can lead to a myriad of health problems, including respiratory disorders, reproductive issues, developmental abnormalities, and an increased risk of cancer. Thus, understanding the mechanisms and consequences of exposure to environmental toxins is of paramount importance for safeguarding public health [1]. Rodents, particularly mice and rats, are commonly used as models in environmental toxicity research. Rodents share many genetic similarities with humans, making them suitable for studying the effects of toxins on the human genome. Rodents have relatively short lifespans, allowing researchers to observe the long-term effects of environmental toxins within a reasonable time frame. Using rodents in experiments can reduce ethical concerns associated with human testing, allowing researchers to investigate the impact of toxins without jeopardizing human health [2].

Rodent models play a crucial role in investigating the impact of environmental toxins on human health. Researchers expose rodents to controlled doses of various environmental toxins and monitor their health and behavior over time. By studying the effects of toxins on these animals, scientists can gain valuable insights into how these substances might affect humans. For example, a study might expose rodents to airborne pollutants present in urban environments and then observe respiratory issues, cardiovascular problems, or cognitive deficits in the exposed animals. These findings can provide critical information about the potential risks to human health in similar environmental conditions [3].

Rodent models also help researchers understand the underlying mechanisms through which environmental toxins exert their effects. These mechanisms may include oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, and disruption of hormonal regulation. By examining these mechanisms in rodents, scientists can unravel the cellular and molecular processes involved, providing a basis for developing treatments or preventive measures. For instance, if exposure to a particular chemical is found to increase oxidative stress in rodents, scientists can investigate antioxidant therapies that may mitigate this effect and potentially protect human health in polluted environments [4]. In a study using mice, researchers exposed the animals to fine particulate matter, a component of air pollution. The study found that exposure to this pollutant led to the development of atherosclerosis, a condition characterized by the hardening of arteries. This research suggests a direct link between air pollution and cardiovascular disease in humans. Experiments with rodents have demonstrated that exposure to certain pesticides can lead to neurobehavioral deficits. These findings have raised concerns about the potential impact of pesticide exposure on human neurological health, particularly in agricultural areas [5].

Conclusion

Environmental toxicity is a significant concern for human health, and rodent models provide a valuable tool for investigating its effects and underlying mechanisms. These models allow researchers to simulate and study the impact of various environmental toxins on health, providing insights into the potential risks for humans. Moreover, they contribute to our understanding of the trans generational effects of exposure to environmental toxins. Ultimately, the knowledge gained from rodent research informs public health policies and strategies to mitigate the health risks associated with environmental toxicity, safeguarding human health and the well-being of future generations.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Imaoka, Tatsuhiko, Mayumi Nishimura, Daisuke Iizuka and Kazuhiro Daino et al. "Radiation-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rodent models: What's different from chemical carcinogenesis?" J Radiat Res 50 (2009): 281-293.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Schreiber, Robert D., Lloyd J. Old and Mark J. Smyth. "Cancer immunoediting: Integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion." Sci 331 (2011): 1565-1570.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Schweppe, Rebecca E., Joshua P. Klopper, Christopher Korch and Umarani Pugazhenthi, et al. "Deoxyribonucleic acid profiling analysis of 40 human thyroid cancer cell lines reveals cross-contamination resulting in cell line redundancy and misidentification." J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93 (2008): 4331-4341.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Morrison, Jennifer A., Laura A. Pike, Greg Lund and Qiong Zhou, et al. "Characterization of thyroid cancer cell lines in murine orthotropic and intracardiac metastasis models." Horm Cancer 6 (2015): 87-99.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Van Es, Suzanne C., Clasina M. Venema, Andor WJM Glaudemans and Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, et al. "Translation of new molecular imaging approaches to the clinical setting: Bridging the gap to implementation." J Nucl Med 57 (2016): 96S-104S.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at