Epilepsy Surgery: An Overview of Procedures and Considerations for Patients

Sofia Jansen^*
*Correspondence: Sofia Jansen, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Email:

Introduction

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures. For many individuals, medication effectively controls these seizures. However, about one-third of patients with epilepsy continue to experience seizures despite medical therapy. For these individuals, epilepsy surgery can be a viable option. Epilepsy surgery is primarily aimed at controlling seizures when medications fail. The main goal is to remove or alter the area of the brain where seizures originate, known as the epileptogenic zone. The success of the surgery depends on accurately identifying this zone and determining that its removal will not result in significant neurological deficits.

Resective surgery: This is the most common type of epilepsy surgery. It involves removing the part of the brain responsible for seizures. The most frequently performed epilepsy surgery, which involves removing a portion of the temporal lobe. It has a high success rate, with 60-70% of patients becoming seizure-free. This involves removing portions of other brain regions, such as the frontal, parietal, or occipital lobes. The success rates vary depending on the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone.

Lesionectomy: If seizures are caused by a specific lesion, such as a tumor, arteriovenous malformation, or cortical dysplasia, the lesion itself can be removed. This procedure can often lead to excellent seizure control [1,2].

Corpus callosotomy: This procedure involves cutting the corpus callosum, the band of nerve fibers connecting the two hemispheres of the brain. It is typically used for patients with severe, generalized seizures, such as drop attacks and aims to reduce the severity and frequency of seizures.

Hemispherectomy and hemispherotomy: These are more radical surgeries where half of the brain's hemisphere is either removed or functionally disconnected. They are reserved for patients with severe epilepsy affecting only one hemisphere, often due to conditions such as Rasmussen's encephalitis or hemimegalencephaly.

Multiple Subpial Transections (MST): When the epileptogenic zone cannot be safely removed, MST involves making small cuts in the brain tissue to interrupt the spread of seizure activity. This procedure is less common and used in specific cases.

Description

Post-surgical care involves ongoing monitoring and adjustment of medications. Rehabilitation services, including physical, occupational and speech therapy, may be necessary to address any functional impairments resulting from surgery. Post-surgical care is a critical component of epilepsy surgery, as it directly impacts recovery, the effectiveness of the procedure and the overall quality of life of the patient. Comprehensive post-surgical care involves a multidisciplinary approach to address the medical, physical and psychological needs of patients [3,4]. This article outlines the key aspects of post-surgical care following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy surgery offers hope for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, providing a chance for improved seizure control and enhanced quality of life. The decision to pursue surgery is complex and requires thorough evaluation and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.

Collaboration between patients, their families and a multidisciplinary medical team is essential for achieving the best outcomes. As surgical techniques and diagnostic tools continue to advance, the potential for successful epilepsy surgery outcomes will likely improve, offering more patients the possibility of a seizure-free life. After epilepsy surgery, patients typically remain in the hospital for monitoring. The length of stay varies but generally ranges from a few days to a week. During this time, medical staff closely monitors the patient for any signs of complications such as infection, bleeding, or neurological changes [5]. Effective pain management is crucial for patient comfort and recovery. Patients are usually given pain medications and their pain levels are regularly assessed to adjust treatment as needed.

Conclusion

Epilepsy surgery offers hope for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, providing a chance for improved seizure control and enhanced quality of life. The decision to pursue surgery is complex and requires thorough evaluation and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits. Collaboration between patients, their families and a multidisciplinary medical team is essential for achieving the best outcomes. As surgical techniques and diagnostic tools continue to advance, the potential for successful epilepsy surgery outcomes will likely improve, offering more patients the possibility of a seizure-free life.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Awad, Issam and Pascal Jabbour. "Cerebral cavernous malformations and epilepsy." Neurosurg Focus 21 (2006): 1-9.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Cappabianca, Paolo, A. Alfieri, Francesco Maiuri and Giuseppe Mariniello, et al. "Supratentorial cavernous malformations and epilepsy: Seizure outcome after lesionectomy on a series of 35 patients." Clin Neurol Neurosurg 99 (1997): 179-183.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Moran, N. F., D. R. Fish, N. Kitchen and S. Shorvon, et al. "Supratentorial cavernous haemangiomas and epilepsy: A review of the literature and case series." J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66 (1999): 561-568.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ferroli, P., M. Casazza, C. Marras and C. Mendola, et al. "Cerebral cavernomas and seizures: A retrospective study on 163 patients who underwent pure lesionectomy." Neurol Sci 26 (2006): 390-394.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Dammann, Philipp, Karsten Wrede, Ramazan Jabbarli and Salome Neuschulte, et al. "Outcome after conservative management or surgical treatment for new-onset epilepsy in cerebral cavernous malformation." J Neurosurg 126 (2017): 1303-1311.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at