Examining Social Sustainability and its Indicators from the Perspectives of Disability Studies and Ability Studies

John Khmara^*
*Correspondence: John Khmara, Department of Economics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA, Email:

Introduction

Disability Studies and Ability Studies are interdisciplinary fields that critically examine the experiences, identities, rights, and social constructions related to disability and ability. Disability Studies emphasizes the social model of disability, which posits that disability arises from societal barriers, attitudes, and exclusion rather than inherent impairments. Ability Studies, on the other hand, focuses on diverse abilities, strengths, and capabilities, challenging normative assumptions about what constitutes "normal" or "typical" functioning. Social sustainability encompasses dimensions such as social equity, justice, diversity, inclusion, and well-being within communities. Examining social sustainability through the lenses of Disability Studies and Ability Studies.

Description

Socially sustainable communities prioritize accessibility, universal design, and barrier-free environments that accommodate diverse abilities and promote inclusive participation in social, economic, and cultural activities. Policies and practices that uphold the rights, dignity, and autonomy of individuals with disabilities are central to social sustainability. This includes inclusive education, employment opportunities, healthcare access, and social support systems. Socially sustainable approaches empower individuals with disabilities to participate in decision-making processes, advocacy efforts, and community initiatives, ensuring their voices are heard and valued. Addressing stigma, stereotypes, and discrimination related to disability and ability is essential for fostering inclusive attitudes, empathy, and mutual respect within society [1].

From the perspectives of Disability Studies and Ability Studies, indicators of social sustainability include access to physical spaces, transportation, information and communication technologies healthcare services, education, employment, and cultural amenities without discrimination or barriers. Existence of policies, legislation, and frameworks that promote accessibility, reasonable accommodations, non-discrimination, and equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities. Active participation of individuals with disabilities in community activities, decision-making processes, social networks, and public discourse, fostering social cohesion and collective wellbeing. Measures of well-being, satisfaction, autonomy, independence, social connectedness, and fulfillment among individuals with disabilities, indicating their holistic integration and inclusion in society [2].

While progress has been made in advancing social sustainability and inclusivity, challenges persist. Negative attitudes, stereotypes, and misconceptions about disability and ability hinder progress towards social sustainability, requiring educational initiatives and awareness campaigns to promote empathy and understanding. Adequate resource allocation, funding, and support mechanisms are needed to ensure that inclusive policies and services are effectively implemented and accessible to all. Intersectional identities and experiences, such as race, gender, socio-economic status, and geographical location, intersect with disability and ability, necessitating intersectional approaches to address multiple forms of marginalization and inequality. Leveraging technology and innovation, such as assistive devices, digital accessibility solutions, and inclusive design practices, can enhance social sustainability and empower individuals with disabilities to fully participate in society [3].

Cities worldwide are implementing accessible urban planning strategies, such as curb cuts, accessible public transportation, tactile paving, and inclusive public spaces, to promote mobility and social inclusion for individuals with disabilities. Inclusive education models, where students with and without disabilities learn together in mainstream classrooms with appropriate support, foster social integration, peer relationships, and academic success. Businesses and organizations are adopting inclusive hiring practices, reasonable accommodations, and diversity and inclusion policies to create accessible and welcoming workplaces for employees with disabilities. Community-led initiatives, such as self-advocacy groups, peer support networks, and disability rights movements, empower individuals with disabilities to advocate for their rights, access resources, and drive positive social change [4,5].

Conclusion

Examining social sustainability through the lenses of Disability Studies and Ability Studies illuminates the complex dynamics of inclusion, diversity, and empowerment within communities. By prioritizing accessibility, inclusivity, empowerment, and respectful representation of diverse abilities, societies can advance social sustainability goals and create environments where everyone can thrive and contribute meaningfully. Collaboration between stakeholders, policymakers, advocates, and researchers is essential for implementing inclusive practices, addressing barriers, and fostering a more equitable and inclusive world for all.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Liu, Qinghua, Zhichun Zhou, Yongcheng Wei and Danyu Shen, et al. "Genome-wide identification of differentially expressed genes associated with the high yielding of oleoresin in secondary xylem of masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb) by transcriptomic analysis." PLoS One 10 (2015): e0132624.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Fu, Liyong, Xiangdong Lei, Zongda Hu and Weisheng Zeng, et al. "Integrating regional climate change into allometric equations for estimating tree aboveground biomass of Masson pine in China." Ann For Sci 74 (2017): 1-15.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Yu, Cun and Xin Luo. "Trichoderma koningiopsis controls Fusarium oxysporum causing damping-off in Pinus massoniana seedlings by regulating active oxygen metabolism, osmotic potential, and the rhizosphere microbiome." Biocontrol 150 (2020): 104352.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Liu, Bin, Qinghua Liu, Zhichun Zhou and Hengfu Yin, et al. "Two terpene synthases in resistant Pinus massoniana contribute to defence against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus." Plant Cell Environ 44 (2021): 257-274.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Wang, Wenwen, Yanfeng Bai, Chunqian Jiang and Haijun Yang, et al. "Development of a linear mixed-effects individual-tree basal area increment model for masson pine in Hunan Province, South-central China." J Sustain For 39 (2020): 526-541.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at