Exploring Nanomaterial Characterization Techniques: Unlocking the Secrets at the Nano Scale

Joohyun Sonaimuthu^*
*Correspondence: Joohyun Sonaimuthu, Department of Chemistry, University of King Saud, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Keywords

Nanomaterial • Nano scale • Spectroscopy

Introduction

Nanomaterials, defined by their dimensions falling within the nanometer scale, exhibit distinctive properties that set them apart from bulk materials. As the applications of nanomaterials continue to expand across fields such as medicine, electronics and energy, the need for accurate and precise characterization becomes paramount. This article aims to explore the various techniques employed for nanomaterial characterization, providing insights into their principles, applications and recent advancements. SEM is a powerful imaging technique that utilizes electron beams to scan the surface of a nanomaterial, providing high-resolution three-dimensional images. This technique is particularly valuable for visualizing surface topography, morphology and particle size distribution at the nanoscale. Recent developments in SEM technology have enhanced its capabilities, allowing for the characterization of nanomaterials with greater precision. TEM takes nanomaterial characterization to the next level by providing detailed images of internal structures at the atomic scale. It operates by transmitting electrons through thin sections of the sample, producing high-resolution images that reveal information about the nanomaterial's crystal structure and composition. With advancements like aberration correction, modern TEM instruments offer unprecedented clarity and accuracy in characterizing nanomaterials [1].

AFM is a versatile technique that employs a sharp tip to scan the surface of a nanomaterial. The interaction forces between the tip and the sample surface are measured, producing high-resolution images of the material's topography and mechanical properties. AFM has the advantage of working in various environments, including liquids, making it suitable for studying biological nanomaterials. Recent developments in AFM technology have expanded its capabilities to enable multifunctional characterization, such as simultaneous imaging and spectroscopy. XRD is a non-destructive technique that analyses the crystal structure of nanomaterials by measuring the diffraction pattern of X-rays. This method provides information about the material's phase composition, crystallinity and lattice parameters. With advancements in XRD instrumentation, including synchrotron radiation sources, researchers can now perform in-depth structural analysis of nanomaterials with enhanced accuracy. Raman spectroscopy utilizes the scattering of monochromatic light to analyse vibrational and rotational modes of nanomaterials. This technique is sensitive to molecular vibrations, providing insights into chemical composition, bonding and structural changes. Recent developments in Raman spectroscopy, such as Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS), have significantly improved its sensitivity, enabling the detection and characterization of nanomaterials at ultra-low concentrations [2].

Literature Review

tracking is a technique that monitors the movement of individual nanoparticles in real-time. This method provides valuable insights into the dynamics, behaviour and interactions of nanomaterials in various environments. With advancements in fluorescence microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), researchers can now study the transport and diffusion of nanoparticles in biological systems, offering crucial information for drug delivery and biomedical applications [3].

This technique is particularly valuable for studying functional groups, polymorphism and surface modifications in nanomaterials. Recent advancements in FTIR instrumentation, such as Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) accessories, have enhanced its sensitivity and spatial resolution, enabling detailed characterization of nanomaterials. Cryo-EM is a cutting-edge technique that involves imaging nanomaterials at extremely low temperatures, preserving their native structure. This method is particularly useful for studying biological nanomaterials, as it allows researchers to capture images of dynamic processes at the molecular level. Recent developments in cryo-EM technology, including direct electron detectors, have revolutionized the field, enabling higher resolution imaging and facilitating breakthroughs in structural biology. Single-particle tracking is a technique that monitors the movement of individual nanoparticles in real-time. This method provides valuable insights into the dynamics, behaviour and interactions of nanomaterials in various environments. With advancements in fluorescence microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), researchers can now study the transport and diffusion of nanoparticles in biological systems, offering crucial information for drug delivery and biomedical applications [4].

Discussion

While the current state of nanomaterial characterization is impressive, ongoing research is focused on addressing challenges and pushing the boundaries of what is possible. One major challenge is the need for in situ and operando characterization techniques, allowing researchers to observe nanomaterials in real-world conditions. This is especially crucial in fields like catalysis and energy storage, where the performance of nanomaterials can be significantly influenced by dynamic environmental factors. Advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence are also making their mark in nanomaterial characterization. These technologies can assist in automating data analysis, enhancing the efficiency of characterization processes and uncovering hidden patterns within vast datasets. The integration of machine learning algorithms with imaging and spectroscopy techniques has the potential to revolutionize how we interpret and utilize nanomaterial characterization data. Furthermore, the development of multi-modal characterization approaches is gaining prominence. Combining different techniques, such as integrating microscopy with spectroscopy, allows researchers to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of nanomaterials by capturing both structural and chemical information simultaneously. This holistic approach is essential for accurately correlating nanomaterial properties with performance in diverse applications [5].

Despite the progress made, challenges remain in characterizing complex nanostructures, such as those with intricate shapes or composite materials. Researchers are actively exploring advanced imaging modalities and hybrid techniques to overcome these challenges and provide a more nuanced understanding of the structural intricacies of nanomaterials. As nanomaterials find increasing applications in medicine, electronics and environmental remediation, ethical considerations surrounding their production, use and disposal become crucial. Understanding the potential environmental and health impacts of nanomaterials is a priority. Characterization techniques play a vital role in assessing the stability, toxicity and biocompatibility of nanomaterials, contributing to the responsible development and deployment of nanotechnology. From the powerful imaging capabilities of electron microscopes to the detailed spectroscopic analyses revealing molecular vibrations, researchers have an extensive toolkit at their disposal [6].

Conclusion

Nanomaterial characterization is a dynamic field driven by constant innovation in instrumentation and methodologies. From traditional microscopy and spectroscopy techniques to emerging technologies like cryo-EM and single-particle tracking, researchers have a diverse toolkit for unravelling the mysteries of nanomaterials. As the applications of nanotechnology continue to grow, the development of advanced characterization techniques will play a pivotal role in harnessing the full potential of nanomaterials across various industries. The continuous evolution of these techniques promises to deepen our understanding of nanomaterials and pave the way for ground breaking discoveries and innovations in the ever-expanding field of nanotechnology.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Tyagi, Deepika, Huide Wang, Weichun Huang and Lanping Hu, et al. "Recent advances in two-dimensional-material-based sensing technology toward health and environmental monitoring applications."Nanoscale12 (2020): 3535-3559.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Kim, Hyemin, Songeun Beack, Seulgi Han and Myeonghwan Shin, et al. "Multifunctional photonic nanomaterials for diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic applications."Adv Mater30 (2018): 1701460.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Zhang, Cheng, Mohan Chen, Yelong Pan and Yang Li, et al. "Carbon Nanodots Memristor: An Emerging Candidate toward Artificial Biosynapse and Human Sensory Perception System."Adv Sci(2023): 2207229.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Parveen, Nazish, Mohammad Omaish Ansari, Sajid Ali Ansari and Pramod Kumar. "Nanostructured titanium nitride and its composites as high-performance supercapacitor electrode material."Nanomater13 (2022): 105.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Abid, Namra, Aqib Muhammad Khan, Sara Shujait and Kainat Chaudhary, et al. "Synthesis of nanomaterials using various top-down and bottom-up approaches, influencing factors, advantages, and disadvantages: A review."Adv Colloid Interface Sci 300 (2022): 102597.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Yu, Deng‐Guang, Menglong Wang, Xiaoyan Li and Xinkuan Liu, et al. "Multifluid electrospinning for the generation of complex nanostructures."Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol12 (2020): e1601.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at