Exploring the Genetic Factors and Molecular Mechanisms Contributing to Breast Cancer Risk and Susceptibility

Luis Elian^*
*Correspondence: Luis Elian, Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA, Email:

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common and aggressive cancers worldwide, affecting millions of women annually. While environmental factors, lifestyle choices, and hormonal influences play a role in its development, a growing body of research highlights the genetic and molecular mechanisms that contribute to breast cancer susceptibility. Understanding these genetic factors is critical for early detection, risk assessment, and the development of targeted therapies. This article explores the key genetic mutations, molecular pathways, and mechanisms involved in breast cancer risk and susceptibility. Genetic influences play a crucial role in determining an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. While environmental factors and lifestyle choices also contribute, specific genetic mutations have been identified as significant risk factors. Breast cancer is a complex and multifaceted disease that arises from the abnormal growth of cells in the breast tissue. Its development involves a series of genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors that interact in various ways. Understanding the role of these factors in breast cancer development is crucial for improving prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. This overview will delve into the key aspects that contribute to breast cancer development, including genetic mutations, hormonal influences, and environmental factors. Genetic predispositions refer to the increased likelihood of developing a disease due to specific genetic variations inherited from one’s parents. In breast cancer, several genes have been identified that significantly elevate the risk of developing the disease. These genes can be broadly categorized into high-penetrance genes, moderate-penetrance genes, and low-penetrance genes, depending on the degree of risk they confer [1].

Description

The most well-known high-penetrance genes associated with breast cancer are ductal carcinoma and lobules of the breast. Mutations in these genes are responsible for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast cancer cases. Women with ductal carcinoma or lobules of the breast mutations have a significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to the general population. Ductal carcinoma and lobules of the breast are tumour suppressor genes involved in DNA repair mechanisms. When these genes are mutated, the ability to repair DNA damage is compromised, leading to genomic instability and increased cancer risk. Ductal carcinoma mutations are also associated with a higher likelihood of developing triple-negative breast cancer, a particularly aggressive form of the disease. Another high-penetrance gene linked to breast cancer is TP53, which encodes the p53 protein. P53 is known as the “guardian of the genome” because of its role in maintaining genomic integrity. Mutations in TP53 are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a hereditary condition that significantly increases the risk of various cancers, including breast cancer. Women with TP53 mutations have a lifetime breast cancer risk of up to 85% [2].

Diet, physical activity, and alcohol consumption can impact breast cancer risk. For example, excessive alcohol intake and obesity are associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer. Women with PALB2 mutations have a breast cancer risk that is approximately three to four times higher than the general population. CHEK2 is a gene that encodes a protein involved in DNA damage response and cell cycle control. Mutations in CHEK2 are associated with a moderate increase in breast cancer risk. The most common CHEK2 mutation, 1100delC, is particularly prevalent in certain populations, such as those of Northern and Eastern European descent. Women with this mutation have a twofold to threefold increased risk of breast cancer. Low-penetrance genes individually contribute to a smaller increase in breast cancer risk but can collectively have a significant impact. These genes often involve Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) that are common in the population. While each SNP may only slightly elevate the risk, the presence of multiple risk alleles can compound the overall risk. The identification of genetic predispositions to breast cancer has significant implications for patient care. Genetic testing can identify individuals with mutations in high- and moderate-penetrance genes, enabling targeted surveillance, risk-reducing strategies, and personalized treatment plans. For individuals with a family history of breast cancer or known genetic mutations, genetic counselling is crucial. Genetic counsellors provide information about the implications of genetic test results, guide decision-making regarding preventive measures (such as prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy), and offer psychological support [3,4].

Breast cancer typically begins in the cells of the ducts or lobules of the breast. Ductal carcinoma originates in the milk ducts, while lobular carcinoma starts in the lobules, the milk-producing glands. The disease can be classified into various types based on the specific characteristics of the cancer cells, such as hormone receptor status and HER2 status. The progression of breast cancer involves a series of stages, from localized tumours to more advanced forms that may spread to other parts of the body. Understanding genetic predispositions to breast cancer allows for the implementation of preventive strategies. For high-risk individuals, options include increased surveillance (such as regular mammograms and MRI screenings), chemoprevention (using medications like tamoxifen or raloxifene), and prophylactic surgeries. Moreover, knowledge of genetic mutations can influence treatment decisions. For example, PARP inhibitors are a class of drugs that have shown efficacy in treating breast cancers associated with ductal carcinoma and lobules of the breast mutations. These drugs exploit the defective DNA repair mechanisms in cancer cells, leading to cell death [5].

Conclusion

The genetic factors and molecular mechanisms contributing to breast cancer risk and susceptibility are complex and multifactorial. Key genetic mutations, such as those in BRCA1, BRCA2, and HER2, have been well-established, with targeted therapies improving outcomes for many patients. Additionally, understanding the molecular pathways that regulate hormone signaling, DNA repair, cell growth, and metastasis is critical for the development of more effective treatments. With the advent of technologies such as genetic testing, genome-wide association studies, and molecular profiling, we are moving toward a more personalized approach to breast cancer management. These advances allow for earlier detection, more precise risk assessment, and the development of targeted therapies tailored to the unique molecular characteristics of each patient’s cancer. As research continues, new insights into the genetic and molecular mechanisms of breast cancer will pave the way for more effective prevention strategies and treatments, ultimately improving survival rates and quality of life for those affected by the disease.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Webb, Bradley A., Michael Chimenti, Matthew P. Jacobson and Diane L. Barber. "Dysregulated pH: A perfect storm for cancer progression." Nat Rev Cancer 11 (2011): 671-677.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Walker, Josephine, Betty B. Chaar, Numa Vera and Alvish S. Pillai, et al. "Medicine shortages in Fiji: A qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views." PloS One 12: e0178429.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Placzek, W. J., J. Wei, S. Kitada and D. Zhai, et al. "A survey of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 subfamily expression in cancer types provides a platform to predict the efficacy of Bcl-2 antagonists in cancer therapy."Cell Death Dis 1 (2010): e40-e40.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Hwang, E. Shelley, Peter Beitsch, Peter Blumencranz and David Carr, et al. "Clinical impact of intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery with a novel pegulicianine fluorescence–guided system: A nonrandomized controlled trial."JAMA Surg 157 (2022): 573-580.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Davis, Scott C., Summer L. Gibbs, Jason R. Gunn and Brian W. Pogue. "Topical dual-stain difference imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor identification in fresh specimens." Opt Lett 38 (2013): 5184-5187.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at