Finding Microbial Partners in Silico to Create Consortiums with Anaerobic Fungi

Elmo Mohan^*
*Correspondence: Elmo Mohan, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA, Email:

Keywords

Food bioprocessing • Leucine • Catalyze

Introduction

Anaerobic fungi are unique microorganisms found in the digestive tracts of herbivores, particularly in the rumen, where they play a key role in breaking down complex plant biomass. These fungi produce a variety of enzymes capable of degrading cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, making them attractive candidates for industrial applications such as biofuel production. However, their efficiency in biomass degradation can be further enhanced by forming consortiums with other microbes. In this article, we explore the use of in silico methods to identify potential microbial partners for anaerobic fungi and the benefits of creating consortiums in biomass degradation. In silico methods, such as metabolic modeling, can be used to predict the metabolic capabilities of anaerobic fungi and potential microbial partners. By analyzing the metabolic pathways of these organisms, researchers can identify compatible partners that can complement the metabolic needs of anaerobic fungi. For example, some bacteria produce enzymes that can break down complex sugars into simpler sugars, which can then be utilized by anaerobic fungi for further degradation. By forming consortiums with these bacteria, anaerobic fungi can efficiently degrade a wider range of substrates. Creating consortiums with compatible microbial partners offers several benefits in biomass degradation. Firstly, consortiums can improve the overall efficiency of biomass degradation by combining the unique capabilities of different microorganisms. For example, some bacteria produce enzymes that can degrade lignin, a complex polymer that is resistant to degradation by anaerobic fungi. By forming consortiums with these bacteria, anaerobic fungi can gain access to lignin-derived sugars, improving their overall efficiency in biomass degradation [1,2].

Literature Review

While in silico methods offer a powerful tool for predicting microbial interactions, there are still challenges in translating these predictions into real-world applications. One challenge is the complexity of microbial communities, which can vary greatly in composition and structure. Additionally, the interactions between microorganisms are influenced by environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and substrate availability, making it difficult to predict the behavior of microbial consortiums in different conditions. In silico methods offer a promising approach to identifying potential microbial partners for anaerobic fungi and creating consortiums for biomass degradation. By understanding the metabolic interactions between anaerobic fungi and other microbes, researchers can design consortiums that are more efficient in biomass degradation, ultimately advancing the field of biofuel production and other industrial applications. Anaerobic fungi are integral to the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass in the digestive tracts of herbivores, making them pivotal for renewable biofuel production and other biotechnological applications [3,4].

Discussion

Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data provide a comprehensive view of the microbial communities present in various environments, such as the rumen of herbivores where anaerobic fungi thrive. By analyzing these datasets, researchers can identify potential microbial partners based on their genetic and functional profiles. Metagenomic data mining involves sequencing the collective genomes of all microorganisms in a given environment. This approach helps identify the presence of anaerobic fungi and their potential microbial partners by analyzing the abundance and diversity of genes involved in biomass degradation and metabolic processes. Metatranscriptomic profiling involves sequencing the RNA transcripts from a microbial community, providing insights into active metabolic pathways and gene expression levels. This method can identify microorganisms that are actively interacting with anaerobic fungi and contributing to biomass degradation. Genome-scale metabolic models are computational frameworks that represent the metabolic networks of microorganisms. GEMs can be used to predict the metabolic interactions between anaerobic fungi and potential microbial partners, allowing for the design of synergistic consortia. To construct GEMs, researchers integrate genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to create a comprehensive map of an organism’s metabolic pathways. For anaerobic fungi and their partners, GEMs can predict the flow of metabolites and identify potential metabolic bottlenecks. Flux balance analysis is a mathematical approach used to analyze the flow of metabolites through a metabolic network. By applying FBA to GEMs, researchers can predict the optimal metabolic interactions and the potential for improved biomass degradation and product formation in consortia [5,6].

Conclusion

Synthetic biology and bioinformatics tools enable the design and optimization of microbial consortia through in silico approaches. These tools can simulate the interactions between different microorganisms and predict the outcomes of various consortium configurations. The COBRA (Constraint-Based Reconstruction and Analysis) Toolbox is a widely used software package for analyzing GEMs. It provides tools for constructing, analyzing, and simulating metabolic networks, allowing researchers to explore the interactions between anaerobic fungi and potential microbial partners. OptCom is a computational framework that allows for the optimization of metabolic interactions within microbial communities. It integrates GEMs of multiple microorganisms to simulate and optimize the performance of microbial consortia, helping identify the best combinations of anaerobic fungi and their partners. However, the full potential of anaerobic fungi is often limited by their metabolic capabilities and growth conditions. To overcome these limitations, the development of microbial consortia with anaerobic fungi and compatible microbial partners can enhance biomass degradation efficiency and overall metabolic outputs. This article explores in silico methods to identify microbial partners that can synergize with anaerobic fungi, creating robust and efficient consortia for various industrial applications.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Risner, Derrick, Elizabeth Tomasino, Paul Hughes and Lisbeth Meunier-Goddik. "Volatile aroma composition of distillates produced from fermented sweet and acid whey." J Dairy Sci 102 (2019): 202-210.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Jun, Joon‐Young, Min‐Jeong Jung, In‐Hak Jeong and Gwang‐Woo Kim, et al. "Effects of crab shell extract as a coagulant on the textural and sensorial properties of tofu (soybean curd)." Food Sci Nutr 7 (2019): 547-553.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Gys, Celine, Michiel Bastiaensen, Liesbeth Bruckers and Ann Colles, et al. "Determinants of exposure levels of bisphenols in flemish adolescents." Environ Res 193 (2021): 110567.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Hazelwood, Lucie A., Jean-Marc Daran, Antonius JA Van Maris and Jack T. Pronk, et al. "The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: A century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism." Appl Environ Microbiol 74 (2008): 2259-2266.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Díez-Antolínez, Rebeca, María Hijosa-Valsero, Ana I. Paniagua-García and Jerson Garita-Cambronero, et al. "Yeast screening and cell immobilization on inert supports for ethanol production from cheese whey permeate with high lactose loads." PLoS One 13 (2018): e0210002.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Rodrigues, Brígida, Maria Emília Lima-Costa, A. Constantino and Sara Raposo, et al. "Growth kinetics and physiological behavior of co-cultures of S. cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis, fermenting carob sugars extracted with whey." Enzyme Microb Technol 92 (2016): 41-48.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at