Forensic Medicine in Mass Casualty Events and Disaster Management

Andreas Baumann^*
*Correspondence: Andreas Baumann, Department of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegórzecka 16 Str., 31-531 Kraków, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Mass Casualty Events (MCEs) and disasters represent extreme situations where large numbers of people are affected by a sudden and often catastrophic event. These can include natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and tsunamis, as well as man-made catastrophes, including terrorist attacks, industrial accidents and transportation crashes. The scale and complexity of these events necessitate a multi-disciplinary approach to manage both immediate and long-term challenges. Forensic medicine, an integral branch of medicine that deals with the application of medical knowledge to legal issues, plays a critical role in disaster management [1].

The forensic aspects of mass casualty events are essential not only for identifying the dead, but also for understanding the causes of death, preventing further injury and assisting in legal and investigative processes. Forensic medicine's role extends from the immediate aftermath of the disaster, through the identification of victims, to the resolution of legal and ethical concerns. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of forensic medicine in mass casualty events and disaster management, highlighting its significance, challenges and the protocols involved [2].

Description

A mass casualty event is defined as a situation where the number of casualties exceeds the capacity of the local medical services to manage them effectively. Disasters, whether natural or man-made, often lead to mass casualties and the challenges associated with these events are far-reaching, encompassing not only medical, logistical and psychological issues but also legal and ethical concerns. Disasters typically lead to significant destruction, overwhelming hospitals and emergency services, disrupting transportation and complicating communication. Forensic medicine in this context becomes essential to address critical aspects of disaster response, such as victim identification, cause of death determination and the management of legal and ethical issues arising from mass fatalities. One of the primary challenges in the aftermath of a mass casualty event is the identification of the deceased. In a disaster scenario, where bodies are often disfigured or fragmented, traditional methods of identification, such as visual recognition, are often inadequate. Forensic pathologists and medical examiners utilize various techniques, including dental records, fingerprint analysis, DNA profiling and personal effects, to identify victims. In cases where identity remains uncertain, forensic anthropology can be helpful in determining biological sex, age and ancestry, which can assist in narrowing down identification. The ability to determine the cause and manner of death in mass casualty situations is critical for both medical and legal reasons. Forensic pathologists are trained to examine bodies and to establish whether deaths were due to trauma, drowning, burns, asphyxiation, or other causes related to the disaster. In cases of criminal activity (e.g., terrorist attacks), forensic medicine can help determine whether a death was the result of homicide, accident, or other factors. Understanding the cause of death helps public health authorities assess the immediate risks, like exposure to hazardous materials and take appropriate preventive measures [3].

Effective disaster management requires coordination among multiple sectors, including emergency services, health systems, government agencies and humanitarian organizations. The integration of forensic medicine into this multi-agency response is essential to address the complexities of mass casualty events. Forensic medicine plays a key role at various stages of disaster management, from preparedness to recovery. In advance of potential disasters, forensic teams engage in training and simulation exercises to prepare for the challenges of victim identification and evidence preservation. Disaster drills and simulations help forensic teams refine their skills in handling large-scale fatalities and help ensure that resources and personnel are allocated efficiently. Coordination with local law enforcement, emergency medical services (EMS) and disaster response teams is vital in these preparedness activities. In the immediate aftermath of a disaster, forensic teams must quickly mobilize to assist with victim identification, cause of death determination and evidence preservation. The first responders often include medical teams who assess and stabilize survivors, while forensic teams begin the grim task of identifying the deceased and preserving evidence. Mortuary services are often overwhelmed and forensic experts are needed to manage the deceased in a systematic and respectful manner, ensuring that bodies are properly identified and handled according to established protocols [4].

After the immediate crisis subsides, forensic teams continue their work in the recovery phase. This phase involves finalizing victim identification, providing death certificates and supporting the legal investigation into the cause of the disaster. Forensic teams may also help families by providing psychological support and ensuring that bodies are returned to relatives in a timely manner. A key aspect of recovery is also analyzing the event to understand its full scope, identify any systemic failures and provide insights for future prevention. Forensic medicine's role in post-disaster investigations helps policymakers and disaster response planners develop strategies to prevent or mitigate the impact of future events. Mass casualty events often raise complex ethical and legal dilemmas, especially when identifying victims, handling remains and managing the survivors' health. Forensic practitioners are required to follow ethical guidelines to ensure that victims' rights are respected, both in terms of their dignity and the handling of their remains. Furthermore, forensic teams may be involved in addressing the legal implications of disasters, such as liability, criminal investigations and insurance claims. The application of forensic principles in these situations helps establish accountability and supports justice for victims. In large-scale disasters, forensic teams often face resource limitations, including inadequate personnel, lack of equipment and poor infrastructure. This can slow down victim identification and the investigation process [5].

Conclusion

Forensic medicine is an indispensable part of disaster management, particularly in mass casualty events. From victim identification to the determination of cause of death, forensic professionals ensure that the dead are treated with dignity, the injured are cared for and investigations into the disaster are thorough. Their work helps to provide clarity for the families of victims, assists in legal processes and contributes to public health responses. However, the challenges faced by forensic teams in such scenarios are significant. Resource shortages, overwhelming caseloads and the need for interagency cooperation require careful planning and coordination to ensure effective response. As the frequency and scale of mass casualty events continue to grow, there is an increasing need for preparedness, training and innovation in forensic techniques to ensure that responses remain efficient and compassionate. The future of forensic medicine in disaster management lies in strengthening global collaboration, enhancing technological capabilities and building systems that can rapidly adapt to the evolving nature of mass casualty events. The role of forensic professionals in these contexts will continue to be vital in safeguarding public health, justice and human dignity in the face of disaster.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Concheiro, Marta, Rachel Chesser, Justine Pardi and Gail Cooper. "Postmortem toxicology of new synthetic opioids." Front Pharmacol 9 (2018): 1210.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Baumann, Michael H., Susruta Majumdar, Valerie Le Rouzic and Amanda Hunkele, et al. "Pharmacological characterization of Novel Synthetic Opioids (NSO) found in the recreational drug marketplace." Neuropharmacol 134 (2018): 101-107.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Sharma, Kirti Kumari, Tim G. Hales, Vaidya Jayathirtha Rao and Niamh NicDaeid, et al. "The search for the “next” euphoric non-fentanil novel synthetic opioids on the illicit drugs market: Current status and horizon scanning." Forensic Toxicol 37 (2019): 1-16.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Jakobsson, Gerd, Michael T. Truver, Sonja A. Wrobel and Henrik Gréen, et al. "Heroin-related compounds and metabolic ratios in postmortem samples using LC–MS-MS." J Anal Toxicol 45 (2021): 215-225.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Tabarra, Inês, Sofia Soares, Tiago Rosado and Joana Gonçalves, et al. "Novel synthetic opioids–toxicological aspects and analysis." Forensic Sci Res 4 (2019): 111-140.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at