General Relativity and Teleparallel Gravity, a Note on the Equivalence of the Energy-Momentum Distribution for Diagonal and Non-Diagonal Models

Xuejuan Kuang^*
*Correspondence: Xuejuan Kuang, Department of Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China, Email:

Description

The examination local area of Material science has dealt with the issue of limitation of energy-force starting from the origin of general relativity (GR). Numerous scientists contributed their endeavors to take care of the issue and acquired a few steady outcomes. To manage this issue different energy and force buildings, for example, Einstein, Landau and Lifshitz, Weinberg, Papapetrou, Bergman and Thomson, Möller and Tolman are presented. These details have restriction that they work sensibly great just in Cartesian direction framework. There has been a longstanding, dubious despite everything irritating issue of the restriction of energy (i.e., to communicate it as an extraordinary tensor amount) in GR. Many creators investigated a few models in the system of GR and found that different energy buildings can give either something very similar or various outcomes for a given space-time. At first GR confronted analysis on many issues. This constrained Einstein to change his hypothesis. He in this manner attempted quadruplicate fields to get a brought together hypothesis which could oblige the laws of electromagnetism and attractive energy. In spite of the fact that he didn't prevail in his endeavor however his work brought forth one more hypothesis known as teleparallel gravity (TG) [1].

TG hypothesis is represented by quadruplicate fields and depends on Weitzenböck calculation. In Weitzenböck calculation, just twist is non-zero while arch disappears. In this manner, TG hypothesis is represented simply by twist which behaves like a power. After the presentation of TG hypothesis, analysts contemplated the energy confinement in this hypothesis. They were certain to track down an answer for the well-established issue of energy confinement in TG hypothesis. Vargas involved Einstein and Landau-Lifshitz solutions in teleparallel hypothesis and researched that net energy of the shut Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe is zero. Vargas acquired comparative outcomes to the all-around got consequences of Rozen. Crafted by Vergas hence drove numerous analysts to explore the conveyance of energy and force for various space-times with the assistance of teleparallel variants of energy remedies. These teleparallel renditions showed some likeness of results for not many space-times while various outcomes were gotten for other space-times. Sharif and Kanwal dealt with Chime Szekeres metric and investigated that main four remedies (Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, Bergmann-Thompson and Möller) produce same outcomes in GR and TG hypothesis [2,3].

There are various papers in which creators have shown similar outcomes for various energy edifices yet apparently, no paper is accessible which could make sense of commonly the occurrence of energy tensor or super-capability of any two remedies for any class of slanting space-time metric. A few creators have been concentrated on the energy-force of non-slanting space-times and showed that the super-potential characterized by Einstein, Landau- Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson in everyday relativity hypothesis and in teleparallel gravity hypothesis can be equivalent or nonequivalent. Notwithstanding, they demonstrated that the energy tensor characterized by Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann- Thompson are comparable in everyday relativity hypothesis and in teleparallel gravity hypothesis for these non-askew space-times [4].

In the creators didn't acquire similar outcomes for the energy in everyday relativity hypothesis and in teleparallel gravity hypothesis. The primary model is Hiscock-Gott metric inside the string object and the second is the static pivotally symmetric space-time. In my paper, more models are given to show that the super-potential and energy-force characterized by Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson in everyday relativity hypothesis and in teleparallel gravity hypothesis are different for some space-times. As these papers have delivered various outcomes so I'm searching for a general outcome that when these two speculations will create a similar outcome and when they will have various outcomes. In this association it will be shown that the super-potential characterized by Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson in everyday relativity and in teleparallel gravity are by and large no different for any slanting space-time, yet not a similar overall for a non-corner to corner space-time. In this way, the energy-force tensor characterized by Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson are identical in everyday relativity hypothesis and in teleparallel gravity hypothesis for the overall slanting space-time and not comparable overall for a non-corner to corner space-time. In the wake of laying out these outcomes, we will check it for different space-times [5].

Conclusion

The remainder of the paper is planned as follows: In Area "An Outline of the GR and TG", a prologue to the Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson energy-force buildings in everyday relativity and teleparallel gravity is given. In Segment "Energy Dissemination for Slanting Models in GR and TG", a hypothesis is demonstrated for an overall corner to corner space-time. Additionally, two unique instances of corner to corner measurements are given where Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz and Bergmann-Thompson's characterized energy-force tensors produce comparative outcomes in GR and TG hypothesis, separately. In Segment "Energy Dissemination for Non-Slanting Models in GR and TG", two counter-instances of a non-corner to corner measurements are presented where the super-possible parts and energy-force tensors are characterized by Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson give the various outcomes in everyday relativity and in teleparallel gravity, separately. The issue of confinement of energy is unsettled and dubious, albeit much consideration has been given by various researchers to determine it. Here, we have examined the issue of limitation of energy-force in the two unique systems of GR and TG by utilizing different energy buildings. There are various creators who have shown similar consequences of Einstein, Landau-Lifshitz, and Bergmann-Thompson energy tensor or super-capability of any three remedies for any class of askew and non-corner to corner space-time metric in GR and TG.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Abbott, B. P., R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, and S. Abraham et al. "Optically targeted search for gravitational waves emitted by core-collapse supernovae during the first and second observing runs of advanced LIGO and advanced Virgo." Phys Rev D 101 (2020): 084002.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Hess, Peter O., and Enrique López-Moreno. "Kerr Black Holes within a Modified Theory of Gravity." Universe 5 (2019): 191.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Ciftci, Hakan, Richard L. Hall, and Nasser Saad. "Perturbation theory in a framework of iteration methods." Phys Lett 340 (2005): 388-396.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Kidd, Richard, James Ardini, and Anatol Anton. "Evolution of the modern photon." Am J Phys 57 (1989): 27-35.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Gaillard, Mary K., Paul D. Grannis, and Frank J. Sciulli. "The standard model of particle physics." Rev Mod Phys 71(1999): 96.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at