GET THE APP

Global Financial Architecture: Structures and Transformations
..

Business and Economics Journal

ISSN: 2151-6219

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 4

Global Financial Architecture: Structures and Transformations

Georgios Chortareas*
*Correspondence: Georgios Chortareas, Department of Business, King’s College London, Bush House, 30 Aldwych, WC2 B4BG, Ireland, UK, Email:
Department of Business, King’s College London, Bush House, 30 Aldwych, WC2 B4BG, Ireland, UK

Received: 03-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. bej-23-109829; Editor assigned: 05-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. P-109829; Reviewed: 17-Jul-2023, QC No. Q-109829; Revised: 24-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. R-109829; Published: 31-Jul-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2151-6219.2023.14.442
Citation: Chortareas, Georgios. “Global Financial Architecture: Structures and Transformations.” Bus Econ J 14 (2023): 442.
Copyright: © 2023 Chortareas G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The global financial architecture refers to the intricate network of institutions, regulations, and mechanisms that govern the flow of capital, investments, and financial transactions across international borders. It plays a pivotal role in shaping the global economy and influencing economic growth, stability, and development. Over the years, the global financial architecture has undergone significant transformations in response to evolving economic realities, technological advancements, and policy changes. This essay delves into the structures and transformations of the global financial architecture examining its key components and the driving forces behind its evolution.

Keywords

Economic growth • Transformations • Global financial architecture

Introduction

Structures of the global financial architecture

The global financial architecture is characterized by a complex web of interconnected institutions and frameworks that facilitate the movement of funds and resources across countries. Some of the key components of this architecture include:

International Financial Institutions (IFIs): IFIs such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank play a crucial role in providing financial assistance, promoting economic stability, and facilitating development in member countries. These institutions offer loans, grants, and technical assistance to address balance of payments crises, promote poverty reduction, and support infrastructure projects [1].

Central banks and regulatory authorities: Central banks are responsible for managing a country's monetary policy, including the regulation of interest rates, money supply, and exchange rates. Regulatory authorities oversee financial markets, ensuring transparency, stability, and fair practices.

Financial markets: Global financial markets, including equity, bond, foreign exchange, and commodity markets, enable the trading of financial instruments. These markets provide a platform for investors to allocate capital and manage risk.

Multinational Corporations (MNCs): MNCs operate across national boundaries and play a critical role in shaping the global financial architecture. They engage in cross-border investments, mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures, influencing capital flows and economic growth.

Bilateral and multilateral agreements: Trade agreements, investment treaties, and regional economic blocs create frameworks for cooperation, reducing trade barriers and promoting economic integration among nations.

Technological infrastructure: The advent of technology has led to the development of electronic payment systems, online banking, and fintech innovations that have transformed how financial transactions are conducted globally [2].

Literature Review

Transformations of the global financial architecture

The global financial architecture has witnessed several transformations over the years, driven by a combination of economic, political, and technological factors. Some of the notable transformations include:

Globalization and liberalization: The late 20th century saw a significant push towards globalization and economic liberalization. This led to increased cross-border trade and investment, prompting the need for more efficient financial systems to support these flows.

Financial crises and regulatory reforms: The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, and subsequent crises highlighted vulnerabilities in the financial architecture. These events prompted regulatory reforms aimed at enhancing transparency, risk management, and oversight of financial institutions.

Digital transformation: Technological advancements have revolutionized financial services through innovations such as online banking, digital payment platforms, and block chain technology. These innovations have increased accessibility, reduced transaction costs, and transformed traditional banking models [3].

Rise of emerging markets: The economic rise of emerging markets, particularly in Asia, has challenged the dominance of traditional financial centres. These countries have demanded greater representation in global financial institutions and a more inclusive financial architecture.

Shift in economic power: The relative economic power of different regions has shifted, with the rise of Asia as an economic powerhouse. This shift has led to calls for rebalancing representation and decision-making in global financial institutions to better reflect these changing dynamics.

Fintech disruption: The emergence of fintech start-ups has disrupted traditional financial services, challenging established players and business models. This has led to discussions about how to regulate and integrate these new technologies into the global financial architecture [4].

Economic integration and inequality

The global financial architecture has enabled unprecedented levels of economic integration, fostering cross-border trade, investment, and capital flows. Proponents argue that such integration can lead to increased economic growth and efficiency, benefiting both developed and developing countries. However, critics contend that this integration has exacerbated income inequality, as the gains from globalization have disproportionately favored certain segments of society while leaving others behind. This discussion highlights the need for policies that ensure the benefits of economic integration are more equitably distributed [5].

Regulation and financial stability

The regulatory framework within the global financial architecture has been a focal point since the 2008 financial crisis. Striking a balance between promoting innovation and ensuring financial stability is a challenge. The question of whether the regulatory reforms post-crisis have been sufficient to prevent future crises remains a subject of debate. Additionally, the effectiveness of global regulatory bodies like the Financial Stability Board (FSB) in coordinating international financial regulation is an on-going concern.

Role of technology and fintech

The digital transformation of financial services through fintech innovations has sparked discussions about the democratization of finance, increased financial inclusion, and the potential disruption of traditional banking models. Some view these technological advances as a means to bridge gaps in financial access, particularly in underserved regions. However, concerns about data privacy, cyber security, and the concentration of power among tech giants also surface in these discussions [6].

Emerging markets and representation

The rise of emerging markets, particularly in Asia, has led to calls for greater representation in global financial institutions. These countries argue that the current architecture reflects a post-World War II reality and fails to adequately account for their growing economic influence. The discussions around reforming institutions like the IMF and the World Bank to better reflect the new economic landscape underscore the need for equitable decisionmaking.

Sustainable finance and ESG considerations

The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into financial decision-making is reshaping the global financial architecture. Investors are increasingly factoring in ESG considerations, leading to a reallocation of capital toward more sustainable projects. However, discussions revolve around defining standardized ESG metrics, avoiding green washing, and ensuring that sustainable finance genuinely contributes to global environmental and social goals.

Geopolitical challenges

Geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and sanctions can disrupt the functioning of the global financial architecture. These discussions touch on the role of economic instruments as tools of foreign policy, the implications of unilateral actions on global stability, and the importance of international cooperation to prevent such disruptions.

Future of the reserve currency system

The role of the US dollar as the world's primary reserve currency is a subject of on-going debate. Some propose alternatives, such as a multipolar reserve currency system or the potential influence of digital currencies. These discussions involve considerations of economic power dynamics, currency stability, and the potential implications for global financial stability.

Conclusion

The global financial architecture is a complex and evolving system that plays a vital role in shaping the global economy. Its structures have been influenced by a myriad of factors, from technological innovations to economic shifts and geopolitical dynamics. The architecture has transformed to adapt to new realities and challenges, with on-going debates about how to create a more inclusive, stable, and sustainable financial system. As the world continues to change, the global financial architecture will undoubtedly continue to evolve, requiring careful consideration, collaboration, and adaptation to ensure its effectiveness in supporting global economic growth and stability.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Abatecola, Gianpaolo, Matteo Cristofaro, Federico Giannetti and Johan Kask. "How can biases affect entrepreneurial decision making? Toward a behavioral approach to unicorns." Int Entrep Manag J 18 (2022): 693-711.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Burström, Thommie, Vinit Parida, Tom Lahti and Joakim Wincent. "AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research." J Bus Res 127 (2021): 85-95.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Minelgaitė, Audronė and Genovaitė Liobikienė. "Changes in pro-environmental behaviour and its determinants during long-term period in a transition country as Lithuania." Environ Develop Sustain (2021): 1-17.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Steg, Linda and Judith De Groot. "Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model." British J Soc Psychol 49 (2010): 725-743.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Ibaceta, Miguel and Hector P. Madrid. "Personality and mind-wandering self-perception: The role of meta-awareness." Frontiers Psychol 12 (2021): 581129.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Lane, Kathleen L., Tam E. O'Shaughnessy, Katina M. Lambros and Frank M. Gresham, et al. "The efficacy of phonological awareness training with first-grade students who have behavior problems and reading difficulties." J Emot Behav Disor 9 (2001): 219-231.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 5936

Business and Economics Journal received 5936 citations as per Google Scholar report

Business and Economics Journal peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward