Grouping Heterogeneous Nature-based Business Models and Applying Creative Governance and Financing Ideas

Emma Richardson^*
*Correspondence: Emma Richardson, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK, Email:

Introduction

As global environmental challenges intensify, nature-based business models have emerged as vital mechanisms to address sustainability, biodiversity conservation, and climate resilience. These models integrate ecological principles into business practices, seeking to harmonize profitability with environmental stewardship. However, the heterogeneity of these models—ranging from ecosystem service markets and sustainable agriculture to eco-tourism and green infrastructure—presents both opportunities and complexities in governance and financing. Effective strategies for grouping these diverse models and applying innovative governance and financing solutions are essential to maximize their ecological and economic potential [1].

This article delves into the categorization of heterogeneous nature-based business models and explores creative governance and financing mechanisms to enhance their effectiveness and scalability. Ecosystem service markets monetize the benefits provided by ecosystems, such as carbon sequestration, water purification, and biodiversity. Examples include carbon offset markets and Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. These models often involve transactions where beneficiaries of ecosystem services pay providers to maintain or enhance these services [2].

Description

Sustainable agriculture and forestry practices integrate environmental conservation with economic activities. This includes agroforestry, organic farming, and sustainable logging practices that maintain soil health, water quality, and biodiversity while producing food and timber. Eco-tourism promotes responsible travel to natural areas, emphasizing conservation, education, and community involvement. This model aims to generate revenue for conservation efforts and local communities while minimizing the environmental impact of tourism activities. This is the risk of losses due to fluctuations in the financial markets. Green infrastructure involves natural and semi-natural systems that provide urban environmental benefits. Examples include green roofs, rain gardens, and urban forests, which help manage stormwater, reduce urban heat islands, and enhance urban biodiversity [3].

Governance structures for NBBMs must accommodate the complexity and diversity of these models while ensuring sustainability and inclusivity. Effective governance involves the coordination of multiple stakeholders, transparent decision-making, and adaptive management practices. Engaging a diverse range of stakeholders, including government agencies, private sector entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and local communities, is crucial. Multi-stakeholder platforms facilitate dialogue, build trust, and ensure that diverse interests are represented in decision-making processes. Adaptive management involves continuous learning and flexibility in governance practices. By monitoring outcomes and adjusting strategies in response to new information and changing conditions, adaptive management ensures that NBBMs remain resilient and effective over time. Integrating NBBMs into broader policy frameworks enhances their legitimacy and impact. Policies that support sustainable land use, climate mitigation, and biodiversity conservation can provide the necessary regulatory and financial support for NBBMs to thrive [4].

Financing NBBMs requires innovative approaches that go beyond traditional funding mechanisms. Blended finance, impact investing, and green bonds are among the creative financial instruments that can support the development and scaling of NBBMs. Blended finance involves combining public and private capital to leverage greater investment in NBBMs. Public funds can be used to de-risk investments, making them more attractive to private investors. This approach helps mobilize significant capital for projects that might otherwise struggle to secure funding. Impact investors seek both financial returns and positive social or environmental impacts. By investing in NBBMs, impact investors can support sustainable development goals while achieving their financial objectives. This form of investment is particularly suited to businesses that can demonstrate measurable environmental benefits. Green bonds are debt instruments specifically earmarked for projects with environmental benefits. Issuing green bonds allows companies and governments to raise capital for NBBMs while signaling their commitment to sustainability to investors and stakeholders [5].

Conclusion

Grouping heterogeneous nature-based business models and applying creative governance and financing ideas is crucial for addressing global environmental challenges. By categorizing these models based on their core functions and objectives, stakeholders can tailor governance and financing solutions to their specific needs. Effective governance involves multi-stakeholder engagement, adaptive management, policy integration, and community-based approaches. Innovative financing mechanisms such as blended finance, impact investing, green bonds, PES, and crowdfunding can mobilize the necessary capital to support the development and scaling of NBBMs. Case studies from around the world illustrate the potential of these models to deliver significant ecological and economic benefits. By leveraging the diversity and creativity of nature-based business models, we can create a more sustainable and resilient future for all.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Keesstra, Saskia, Joao Nunes, Agata Novara and David Finger, et al. "The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services." Sci Total Environ 610 (2018): 997-1009.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Faivre, Nicolas, Marco Fritz, Tiago Freitas and Birgit De Boissezon, et al. "Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges." Environ Res 159 (2017): 509-518.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Pineda-Pinto, Melissa, Niki Frantzeskaki and Christian A. Nygaard. "The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review." Ambio (2021): 1-16.

 Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Bockarjova, Marija, Wouter JW Botzen and Mark J. Koetse. "Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis." Ecological Econ 169 (2020): 106480.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Croci, Edoardo, Benedetta Lucchitta and Tommaso Penati. "Valuing ecosystem services at the urban level: A critical review." Sustainability 13 (2021): 1129.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at