Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Microsatellite Instability and KRAS/BRAF Mutations in Cancer: A Revolutionary Approach

Maria Getino^*
*Correspondence: Maria Getino, Department of Pediatrics, University of Statens Serum, Copenhagen, Denmark, Email:

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the most challenging health issues worldwide, with its complexity often defying conventional diagnostic and treatment approaches. In recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare has shown promising results in various domains, including cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Among the critical molecular markers in cancer, Microsatellite Instability (MSI) and mutations in genes such as KRAS and BRAF hold significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. This article explores the revolutionary role of AI in predicting MSI, KRAS, and BRAF mutations, revolutionizing cancer management strategies, Microsatellites are short, repetitive DNA sequences scattered throughout the genome. MSI refers to the accumulation of errors (insertions or deletions) in these repetitive sequences due to impaired DNA mismatch repair mechanisms. MSI has emerged as a hallmark of several cancers, notably Colorectal Cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer, and gastric cancer, influencing prognosis and therapeutic response. KRAS and BRAF genes encode proteins involved in intracellular signalling pathways regulating cell growth and differentiation. Mutations in these genes are frequently encountered in various cancers, particularly CRC, impacting tumour behaviour and therapeutic susceptibility. For instance, KRAS mutations are associated with resistance to anti-EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) therapies in CRC patients [1].

Description

Pharmacogenomics, a key component of individualized medicine, leverages genetic information to optimize drug therapy. Understanding how an individual's genetic makeup influences their response to medications allows healthcare providers to prescribe drugs at optimal dosages, minimizing the risk of adverse reactions and enhancing treatment effectiveness. This tailored approach is particularly relevant in chronic conditions, where variations in drug metabolism can significantly impact therapeutic outcomes. Genetics also plays a pivotal role in the realm of cancer treatment. The era of precision oncology relies on the identification of specific genetic alterations driving tumour growth. Genomic profiling of tumours enables oncologists to pinpoint actionable mutations, guiding the selection of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The result is a more individualized and effective approach to cancer treatment, with the potential to improve response rates and minimize the side effects associated with traditional chemotherapy. Furthermore, genetics contributes to risk assessment and disease prevention. Predictive genetic testing allows individuals to understand their susceptibility to certain conditions, empowering them to adopt proactive lifestyle changes, undergo targeted screening, and make informed decisions about preventive interventions. This personalized risk assessment not only enhances early detection but also facilitates more targeted and cost-effective public health strategies [2].

Traditional methods for predicting MSI, KRAS, and BRAF mutations involve labour-intensive molecular assays and histopathological examinations. However, AI-driven approaches offer a paradigm shift by leveraging computational algorithms to analyze vast datasets encompassing clinical, genomic, and histopathological information. These AI models can extract subtle patterns and relationships that may elude human observation, enhancing predictive accuracy and efficiency. Machine learning algorithms, particularly deep learning models like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), have demonstrated remarkable performance in predicting MSI status from histopathological images and genomic data. CNNs excel in image analysis tasks, extracting intricate features from tissue slides, while RNNs are adept at processing sequential genomic data, capturing underlying MSI signatures [3].

The advent of multi-omics technologies, encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, has enriched cancer profiling, providing comprehensive molecular insights. AI algorithms adeptly integrate these heterogeneous datasets, enabling holistic analysis and robust predictions of MSI and mutational status. By considering diverse molecular layers, AI models enhance predictive robustness and elucidate intricate tumor biology. The integration of AI-powered MSI prediction into routine clinical practice holds transformative potential. Rapid and accurate MSI assessment facilitates risk stratification, guiding personalized treatment decisions in CRC and other MSI-high cancers. Furthermore, AI-based prediction of KRAS and BRAF mutations informs targeted therapy selection, optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing treatment-related adverse events [4,5].

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence heralds a new era in cancer prediction and management, particularly in elucidating MSI status and mutational landscape. By harnessing advanced computational algorithms and multi-omics integration, AI empowers clinicians with precise prognostic insights and personalized therapeutic strategies. As research advances and AI technologies mature, the synergy between artificial intelligence and oncology promises to revolutionize cancer care, fostering improved patient outcomes and advancing towards the goal of precision medicine..

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Varki, Ajit, William Sherman and Stuart Kornfeld. "Demonstration of the enzymatic mechanisms of α-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-1-phosphodiester N-acetylglucosaminidase and lysosomal α-N-acetyl glucosaminidase.” Arch Biochem 222 (1983): 145-149.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Lee, Wang-Sik, Changsoo Kang, Dennis Drayna and Stuart Kornfeld. "Analysis of mannose 6-phosphate uncovering enzyme mutations associated with persistent stuttering." J Biol Chem 286 (2011): 39786-39793.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Datta, S. R., A. McQuillin, M. Rizig and E. Blaveri, et al. "A threonine to isoleucine missense mutation in the pericentriolar material 1 gene is strongly associated with schizophrenia." Mol Psychiatry 15 (2010): 615-628.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Teng, Shaolei, Anand K. Srivastava, Charles E. Schwartz and Emil Alexov, et al. "Structural assessment of the effects of Amino Acid Substitutions on protein stability and protein? protein interaction." Int J Comput Biol Drug Des 3 (2010): 334-349.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Weng, Pei-Wei, Narpati Wesa Pikatan, Syahru Agung Setiawan and Vijesh Kumar Yadav, et al. "Role of GDF15/MAPK14 axis in chondrocyte senescence as a novel senomorphic agent in osteoarthritis." Int J Mol Sci 23 (2022): 7043.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at