GET THE APP

Harnessing Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy
..

Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism

ISSN: 2165-7912

Open Access

Perspective - (2024) Volume 14, Issue 1

Harnessing Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy

William Mark*
*Correspondence: William Mark, Department of Communication, Saint Peter’s College, 121 Glenwood Avenue, Jersey City, USA, Email:
Department of Communication, Saint Peter’s College, 121 Glenwood Avenue, Jersey City, USA

Received: 01-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. jmcj-24-135457; Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2024, Pre QC No. P-135457; Reviewed: 16-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-135457; Revised: 22-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-135457; Published: 29-Feb-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2165-7912.2024.14.555
Citation: Mark, William. “Harnessing Mesenchymal Stem Cellderived Extracellular Vesicles for Alzheimer’s disease Therapy.” J Mass Communicat Journalism 14 (2024): 555.
Copyright: © 2024 Mark W. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant global health challenge, with no cure currently available. However, recent advancements in biomedical research have uncovered promising avenues for therapeutic intervention, including the utilization of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs, particularly exosomes, hold immense potential as vehicles for delivering therapeutic cargo to target cells in the central nervous system. This article explores the intricacies of EV-based therapy for Alzheimer's disease, elucidating the mechanisms involved, highlighting recent research findings, discussing challenges, and outlining future directions in this burgeoning field.

Description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavioral disturbances. With an aging global population, the prevalence of AD is expected to rise substantially in the coming decades, necessitating urgent efforts to develop effective therapeutic strategies. Traditional drug delivery methods often face challenges in crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and targeting specific cell types within the brain. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, offer a promising alternative by serving as natural carriers for intercellular communication and delivering therapeutic cargo to recipient cells [1].

EVs are nanosized membrane-bound vesicles released by various cell types into the extracellular environment. They play crucial roles in cell-cell communication, immune modulation, and tissue homeostasis. EVs are classified into three main categories: exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. Exosomes, with their small size (30-150 nm) and ability to traverse biological barriers, have garnered significant attention for their therapeutic potential in AD [2].

Exosomes play multifaceted roles in the pathogenesis of AD. They are involved in the spread of pathological proteins, such as amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau, facilitating the propagation of neurodegeneration throughout the brain. Moreover, exosomes secreted by various cell types within the brain, including neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, contribute to the inflammatory response and synaptic dysfunction observed in AD. However, harnessing exosomes for therapeutic purposes offers a unique opportunity to combat these pathological processes and promote neuroprotection.

Loading exosomes with small interfering RNA (siRNA) or microRNA (miRNA) targeting genes involved in AD pathology, such as amyloid precursor protein (APP) or tau protein, to inhibit their expression.

Packaging neuroprotective agents, such as growth factors or anti-inflammatory compounds, into exosomes to promote neuronal survival and reduce neuroinflammation.

Engineering exosomes to express targeting ligands or peptides that enhance their specificity for BBB crossing and uptake by diseased neurons or glial cells [3].

Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of EV-based therapies in mitigating AD pathology and improving cognitive function in animal models. For instance, intranasal administration of exosome-encapsulated curcumin, a natural compound with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, reduced Aβ deposition and neuroinflammation in transgenic AD mice. Similarly, mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes loaded with neurotrophic factors promoted neuronal survival and synaptic plasticity in AD models. These promising findings have paved the way for the translation of EV-based therapies into clinical trials for AD patients [4].

Overview of AD pathology amyloid-beta plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, synaptic dysfunction, and neuroinflammation.

Current treatment strategies and limitations are symptomatic relief, disease-modifying therapies under investigation, and challenges in drug delivery to the brain.

Characteristics of MSCs: multipotency, immunomodulatory properties, and ability to migrate to sites of injury.

Introduction to EVs: exosomes and microvesicles released by MSCs containing proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids.

Advantages of MSC-EVs over MSC transplantation: reduced risk of immune rejection, tumorigenesis, and ethical concerns.

Therapeutic mechanisms of MSC-EVs in Alzheimer’s disease

Neuroprotection: MSC-EVs promote neuronal survival and inhibit apoptosis through the transfer of neuroprotective factors.

Modulation of neuroinflammation: suppression of microglial activation and cytokine release, leading to reduced neuroinflammatory responses.

Enhancement of synaptic function: promotion of neurite outgrowth, synaptogenesis, and neurotransmitter release by MSC-EV-mediated signaling pathways.

Clearance of amyloid-beta: facilitation of amyloid-beta clearance via autophagy and proteasomal degradation pathways.

Preclinical evidence supporting msc-ev therapy for Alzheimer’s disease

Animal studies demonstrating improved cognitive function, reduced amyloid-beta deposition, and neuroinflammation following MSC-EV treatment.

Mechanistic insights from in vitro experiments elucidating the molecular pathways involved in MSC-EV-mediated neuroprotection and neuroregeneration.

Clinical trials and translational challenges

Overview of ongoing clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of MSC-EV therapy for AD.

Challenges in clinical translation: standardization of MSC-EV isolation and characterization methods, optimization of dosing regimens, and long-term safety assessments.

Regulatory considerations and ethical implications: addressing concerns related to MSC-EV production, storage, and administration in clinical settings.

Combination therapies: synergistic effects of MSC-EVs with other therapeutic modalities such as small molecules, antibodies, and gene therapy.

Personalized medicine approaches: tailoring MSC-EV therapy based on patient-specific characteristics and disease stage.

Advancements in biomaterials and delivery systems: engineered nanoparticles for targeted delivery of MSC-EVs across the blood-brain barrier [5].

Conclusion

MSC-EVs represent a promising therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's disease, offering neuroprotection, modulation of neuroinflammation, and enhancement of synaptic function. Further research and clinical trials are needed to elucidate their safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment protocols, paving the way for the development of innovative treatments for AD.

References

  1. Rothmann, Wasko and Jochen Koch. "Creativity in strategic lock-ins: The newspaper industry and the digital revolution." Technol Forecast Soc Change 83 (2014): 66-83.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Andrews, Kenneth T and Neal Caren. "Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention and the public agenda." Am Sociol Rev 75 (2010): 841-866.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Cohen, Jonathan, Yariv Tsfati and Tamir Sheafer. "The influence of presumed media influence in politics: Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter?." Public Opin Q 72 (2008): 331-344.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Domingo, David. "Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth." JCMC 13 (2008): 680-704.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Mateus, Samuel. "Journalism as a field of discursive production–performativity, form and style." CJCS 10 (2018): 63-77.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward