GET THE APP

Harnessing the Power of CRISPR Loss-of-function Libraries for Functional Genomics
..

Human Genetics & Embryology

ISSN: 2161-0436

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 3

Harnessing the Power of CRISPR Loss-of-function Libraries for Functional Genomics

Lenimin Xenia*
*Correspondence: Lenimin Xenia, Department of Pharmacy Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, USA, Email:
Department of Pharmacy Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, USA

Received: 17-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. hgec-23-115034; Editor assigned: 19-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. P-115034; Reviewed: 02-Aug-2023, QC No. Q-115034; Revised: 07-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. R-115034; Published: 14-Aug-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0436.2023.14.212
Citation: Xenia, Lenimin. “Harnessing the Power of CRISPR Loss-of-function Libraries for Functional Genomics.” Human Genet Embryol 14 (2023): 212.
Copyright: © 2023 Xenia L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The field of functional genomics has witnessed a remarkable transformation in recent years with the advent of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technology. Among the various applications of CRISPR, loss-of-function libraries have emerged as powerful tools for systematically interrogating gene function on a genome-wide scale. This article provides an in-depth exploration of CRISPR loss-offunction libraries, their development, applications, challenges, and the transformative impact they have had on advancing our understanding of genomics.

Keywords

CRISPR technology • CRISPR libraries • gRNA

Introduction

Functional genomics aims to elucidate the functions of genes and their roles in various biological processes. Traditionally, this involved painstakingly studying one gene at a time, a slow and resource-intensive process. The advent of CRISPR-Cas9 technology revolutionized this field by enabling the rapid, precise, and high-throughput manipulation of genes. CRISPR loss-offunction libraries, in particular, have provided researchers with a systematic approach to assess the impact of gene knockouts across the entire genome. CRISPR libraries enable the systematic knockout of individual genes, providing insights into their functions and essentiality. This information is valuable for understanding gene regulatory networks and identifying potential drug targets. The ease of genome editing with CRISPR technology raises ethical questions, particularly when it comes to editing the human germ line [1].

Literature Review

CRISPR technology, based on the bacterial defense mechanism against viruses, involves using the Cas9 protein and guide RNA (gRNA) molecules to induce double-stranded breaks in target DNA. When these breaks are repaired, they often introduce mutations, leading to gene inactivation. This ability to specifically disrupt genes with high precision forms the foundation of CRISPR loss-of-function libraries. Designing gRNAs that target specific genes of interest is a critical step. Bioinformatics tools assist in selecting gRNAs with high efficiency and minimal off-target effects. gRNAs are synthesized and cloned into plasmids or viral vectors, creating a library of genetic perturbations. Researchers choose an appropriate cell line for library delivery, considering factors such as cell type, ease of transfection and relevance to the study. The library is introduced into the chosen cell line using techniques like viral transduction or electroporation. Selection and analysis cells with gene disruptions are selected and the resulting phenotypes are analyzed using various assays [2,3].

Discussion

CRISPR libraries enable the systematic knockout of individual genes, providing insights into their functions and essentiality. This information is valuable for understanding gene regulatory networks and identifying potential drug targets. By knocking out genes in cancer cell lines and assessing the impact on drug response, researchers can identify new drug targets and mechanisms of drug resistance. CRISPR libraries can be used to investigate synthetic lethality and epistatic interactions between genes, shedding light on complex biological pathways. Libraries can be applied to non-coding regions of the genome, elucidating their regulatory roles in gene expression. Largescale screens using CRISPR libraries can uncover genes involved in specific biological processes, such as apoptosis, cell cycle regulation or immune response [4].

Ensuring the specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 is crucial to avoid unintended genetic perturbations. Improving gRNA design and optimizing Cas9 variants can mitigate this issue. The analysis of high-throughput data generated by CRISPR screens can be complex. Robust bioinformatics tools and computational approaches are essential for data interpretation. Advancements in single-cell genomics enable the study of gene function at the single-cell level, providing insights into cellular heterogeneity. CRISPR libraries are being adapted for use in non-model organisms, expanding our understanding of diverse biological systems. CRISPR-based therapies, including gene editing and gene regulation, are on the horizon, potentially revolutionizing medicine [5,6].

Conclusion

CRISPR loss-of-function libraries have revolutionized the field of functional genomics, enabling researchers to systematically explore the functions of genes on a genome-wide scale. As this technology continues to advance, our understanding of gene function, disease mechanisms, and potential therapeutic targets will deepen. However, researchers must remain vigilant in addressing challenges related to specificity, delivery efficiency, and data analysis while navigating the ethical implications of powerful genome-editing capabilities. The future of functional genomics looks promising, with CRISPR loss-of-function libraries at the forefront of innovation and discovery.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Godfrey, Wesley H., Soonmyung Hwang, Kaho Cho and Shruthi Shanmukha, et al. "Therapeutic potential of blocking GAPDH nitrosylation with CGP3466b in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis." Front Neurol 13 (2023): 979659.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Fukawatase, Yoshihiro, Masashi Toyoda, Kohji Okamura and Ken-ichi Nakamura, et al. "Ataxia telangiectasia derived iPS cells show preserved x-ray sensitivity and decreased chromosomal instability." Sci Rep 4 (2014): 5421.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Campbell, Andrew, Brittany Krupp, Jared Bushman and Mark Noble, et al. "A novel mouse model for ataxia-telangiectasia with a N-terminal mutation displays a behavioral defect and a low incidence of lymphoma but no increased oxidative burden." Hum Mol Genet 24 (2015): 6331-6349.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Mueller, Kaly A., Kelly E. Glajch, Megan N. Huizenga and Remi A. Wilson, et al. "Hippo signaling pathway dysregulation in human Huntington’s disease brain and neuronal stem cells." Sci Rep 8 (2018): 11355.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Zheng, Jianan, Hui Yu, Anqi Zhou and Bingfeng Wu, et al. "It takes two to tango: Coupling of Hippo pathway and redox signaling in biological process." Cell Cycle 19 (2020): 2760-2775.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Zimmermann, Astrid, Frank T. Zenke, Li-Ya Chiu and Heike Dahmen, et al. "A new class of selective ATM inhibitors as combination partners of DNA double-strand break inducing cancer therapies." Mol Cancer Ther 21 (2022): 859-870.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 309

Human Genetics & Embryology received 309 citations as per Google Scholar report

Human Genetics & Embryology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward