GET THE APP

Healthcare Professionals′ Feelings at Work during COVID−19 Pandemic
..

Journal of Nursing & Care

ISSN: 2167-1168

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 2

Healthcare Professionals′ Feelings at Work during COVID−19 Pandemic

Samer Asad*
*Correspondence: Samer Asad, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden, Email:
Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden

Received: 12-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. jnc-23-94941; Editor assigned: 14-Feb-2023, Pre QC No. P-94941; Reviewed: 11-Mar-2023, QC No. Q-94941; Revised: 15-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. R-94941; Published: 22-Mar-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2167-1168.2023.12.585
Citation: Asad, Samer. â??Healthcare Professionalsâ?? Feelings at Work during COVID-19 Pandemic.â? J Nurs Care 12 (2023): 585.
Copyright: © 2023 Asad S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Evidence about the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on the psychological wellness of Palestinian medical care experts is missing and has been dismissed during the Coronavirus pandemic. This study expects to portray Palestinian Healthcare Workers (HCWs) feelings and variables causing pressure, and factors used to lessen the pressure experienced at work and to analyze the connections between HCWs level of pressure and their methods for dealing with especially difficult times and inspirational elements during the Coronavirus pandemic. Furthermore, a significant reason for their pressure was their own wellbeing and having the Coronavirus contamination. Discoveries showed a positive relationship among stress and the more youthful period of members, with doctors being less worried than medical caretakers. Moreover, getting no preparation on the treatment of Coronavirus was unequivocally connected with feelings of anxiety. Besides, there was a huge positive connection between's pressure scoring and survival techniques scoring however not with inspiration score. Taking everything into account, this study shows that Palestinian Healthcare Workers experienced personal disturbance during the Coronavirus pandemic.

Keywords

Health professional • Pandemic • Workplace

Introduction

The Covid sickness (Coronavirus) epidemic began in late December 2019, putting people's mental fortitude to the test in general and medical professionals in particular. It has significantly impacted the mental wellbeing of medical care workers as well as the health of numerous instances and deaths that have occurred throughout the world. Emergency clinics had limited access to resources during the beginning of the Covid epidemic, including empty beds, trained staff, personal defence equipment, and treatment protocols. Professional health workers who weren't prepared for a pandemic were influenced by these factors [1]. Despite a sense of guilt, feelings of vulnerability, alienation, and dejection increased. Numerous studies showed that medical services groups working in Coronavirus units and clinics faced significant stress due to the risk of disease, inadequate pollution protection, the need to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for extended work hours, exhaustion, dissatisfaction, segregation, separation, and a lack of contact with families, fatigue, and managing patients with depressing emotions.

Literature Review

In spite of lacking training in infection management and having limited access to mental support during the Coronavirus, studies have shown that medical care groups faced strain, stress, side effects of melancholy, a sleeping problem, forswearing, wrath, and dread. As a result, 37.5% of miserable labourers, 41.9% of well-being labourers, and 33.9% of them had sleeping problems. More stress-related adverse effects were reported by medical carers than by other health workers. The review made the assumption that members who lacked adequate protective equipment in their well-being settings were more likely to cause emotional well-being problems. In addition, according to a focus by 330 health professionals, 235 of them (71.2%) had clinical anxiety, 88 (26.8%) had clinical depression, 113 (34.3%) had pressure, and 121 (36.7%) had post-awful pressure [2].

People are motivated to participate in particular adapting behaviours by seeing others demonstrate adapting under duress. Before making a decision, a person's motivation is what causes them to feel satisfied or disappointed. So, by regulating the evaluation or feeling of pressure, it may have an influence on strategies for handling particularly challenging situations. HCWs reported high levels of stress and close-to-home injury during the Coronavirus pandemic's primary outbreak, which affected their motivation and coping mechanisms [3].

Discussion

Stress is defined as a situation in which a person feels overwhelmingly large and has more demands than they can handle. If natural demands are deemed dangerous, a person evaluates their current adaptive capabilities to determine whether they believe they are capable of handling the stressor. Adaptation refers to the ideas and behaviours people use to deal with the internal and external demands of a distressing event. It is essential for medical professionals to have effective survival skills during pandemic flare-ups so they can protect themselves from infection and help prevent numerous stressrelated mental illnesses. Surveying the needs and psychological well-being condition of medical care employees during a pandemic flare-up at work is also important [4].

Despite this, there is a lack of information about the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic on Palestinian medical care providers, including their thoughts, anxieties, and coping mechanisms. Palestinian healthcare professionals have the risk of causing problems with mental and psychological well-being since they are directly involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with the Coronavirus in hospitals and clinics. The challenges of accessing adequate protective equipment, the burden of work, the lack of medicines available, the risk of contracting a disease and being quarantined, the lack of involvement and preparation in transmittable disease boards, the rising number of cases and fatalities all increase the risk of psychological health issues that could harm the mental well-being of healthcare workers [5,6].

Conclusion

These findings show the necessity of providing supervision, mental guiding, and mediation to qualified healthcare professionals who work directly with Coronavirus patients in healthcare settings during the current pandemic or in the event of a future flare-up in order to increase flexibility and reduce reliance on families and other people for mental support. To assist HCWs in developing their adaptable strategies for coping with particularly challenging times and boost their motivation, policymakers and administrators can also offer training and provide mediations on how to adjust to pressure in pandemics. Last but not least, in order to reduce stress and hysteria among HCWs in the event of a pandemic, critical personal protective equipment like as gloves, alcoholbased hand sanitizers, facial coverings, disengagement suits, and face shields should be available.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Roy, Adrija, Arvind Kumar Singh, Shree Mishra and Aravinda Chinnadurai, et al. “Mental health implications of COVID-19 pandemic and its response in India.” Int J Soc Psychiatry 67 (2020): 587–600.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Khanal, Pratik, Navin Devkota, Minakshi Dahal and Kiran Paudel, et al. “Mental health impacts among health workers during COVID-19 in a low resource setting: A cross-sectional survey from Nepal.” Global Health 16 (2020): 89.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Kamin, Stefan T., Frieder R. Lang and Anja Beyer. “Subjective technology adaptivity predicts technology use in old age.” Gerontology 63 (2017): 385–392.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Postorino, Massimiliano, Michele Treglia, Jacopo Giammatteo and Margherita Pallocci, et al. “Telemedicine as a Medical Examination Tool During the COVID-19 Emergency: The experience of the onco-haematology center of tor vergata hospital in rome.” Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (2020): 8834.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria M. and Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas. “Usage of medical internet and e-health services by the elderly.” Adv Exp Med Biol 834 (2015): 75–80.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Wang, Yuanyuan, Zhizhou Duan, Zikun Ma and Yize Mao, et al. “Epidemiology of mental health problems among patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic.” Transl Psychiatry 10 (2020): 263.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 4230

Journal of Nursing & Care received 4230 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Nursing & Care peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward