Opinion - (2024) Volume 12, Issue 6
Received: 02-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. jbes-25-159436;
Editor assigned: 03-Dec-2024, Pre QC No. P-159436;
Reviewed: 18-Dec-2024, QC No. Q-159436;
Revised: 24-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. R-159436;
Published:
30-Dec-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2332-2543.2024.12.564
Citation: Cheng, Xia. “High-resolution Pixel-based Remote Sensing for Forest Functionality and Diversity.” J Biodivers Endanger Species 12 (2024): 564.
Copyright: © 2024 Cheng X. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Research on plant ecology and biodiversity has increasingly used traitbased methods and remote sensing. Remote sensing permits assessing functional qualities over vast contiguous areas, in contrast to traditional field survey (which often samples individual trees), but assigns trait values to biological units like as Using pixel-based techniques is challenging for both species and individuals. We compared a pixel-based method with a technique based on aerial LiDAR-delineated Individual Tree Crowns (ITCs) for evaluating functional features from remote sensing data in a subtropical forest setting in China. As pixel size and extent varied, we examined the trait distributions, trait-trait correlations, and functional diversity metrics produced using the ITCand pixel-based techniques. We discovered that physiological differences between ITC- and pixel-based techniques were overshadowed by variations in morphological features determined from airborne laser scanning. Research on plant ecology and biodiversity increasingly uses trait-based methods that concentrate on the functional traits of vascular plants within a community Remote sensing makes it possible to quantify functional qualities over vast, contiguous areas in comparison to traditional field survey, which often samples individual trees. However, pixel-based methodologies make it challenging to attribute trait values to biological units like species and individuals. In order to evaluate functional features using remote sensing data, we compared an approach based on LiDAR-delineated Individual Tree Crowns (ITCs) with a pixel-based approach using a subtropical forest landscape in China. In order to compare the two techniques' results at altering granularity and extent, we analysed trait distributions, trait-trait connections, and functional diversity indicators. We discovered that the differences between morphological characteristics obtained from airborne laser scanning were greater. We discovered that physiological traits calculated using airborne Pushbroom Hyperspectral Imager-3 (PHI-3) hyperspectral data showed less variation than morphological attributes collected from airborne laser scanning. Similar results were obtained using pixel sizes that approximated average tree crowns, however in comparison to ITC-based values, 95th quantile height, foliage height variety, and leaf area index tended to be overestimated. The disparities to ITC-based trait values grew bigger and less trait variance was captured as pixel size increased, indicating information loss. As pixel sizes increased, the consistency of ITC- and pixel-based functional richness likewise dropped and changed in accordance with the extent that was found for functional diversity monitoring. We come to the conclusion that highresolution ITC-based techniques allow for the partitioning of variance between individuals, genotypes, and species [1]. In October 2013, a Yun-5 turboprop aircraft equipped with a Leica ALS70- HP system was used to collect the LiDAR data during the leaf-on season. Using a 0.15 mrad laser, the aircraft soared about 1800 metres above the 0.27 m. The mean point density in the studied region was 9.05 points per square metre, and the maximum scan angle was 17 degrees from the nadir. As LAS 1.3 format files with noise filtering and point cloud categorization, multiple echo recordings (1–5 returns) were provided. In order to determine the morphological characteristics of ITCs and pixels, the elevation of the point clouds was normalised based on the DEM [2].
The scale dependence of functional diversity and the spatial pattern of community assembly were examined by looking at the correlations betweenfunctional richness and area. For these sample locations, we estimated functional richness based on the observed and null-model situations. The locations of all ITCs and pixels within the research region were shuffled at random (randperm, Matlab) in order to create the null models. We examined whether these two methods produced the same community assembly patterns for ITCs and 3-m pixels by comparing the observed and null functional richnessarea connections (i.e. trait convergence or divergence). We might gain insight into the relationships and distinctions between species-level and communitylevel functional trait assessments through our comparison of the ITC- and pixelbased approaches. Insights into upscale functional features could potentially be obtained from data aggregation to ITCs and pixels. In many nations, aerial data are currently typically accessible at regional scales to supplement ground surveys. By giving more model training data and aggregating to the grain size matching with satellite imagery, they can capture fine-scale trait variation and then combine with satellite data to scale-up functional diversity assessments. It would be beneficial to use intermediate-scale airborne data to fill the gap between local ground plots and regional or global spaceborne data because spatial aggregation of high-resolution airborne data could increase the representativeness of trait heterogeneity over larger areas.
Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species received 624 citations as per Google Scholar report