Hydrogen Production from Bio-oil Model Compounds by Steam Reforming: A Thermodynamic Analysis

Julie Malin^*
*Correspondence: Julie Malin, Department of Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, Email:

Keywords

Gas emissions • Hydrogen production • Steam methane

Introduction

Bio-oil is a complex mixture of oxygenated organic compounds derived from biomass pyrolysis. It contains various functional groups, including aldehydes, ketones, acids, phenols, and esters. The presence of oxygenated species affects the reactivity and stability of bio-oil during hydrogen production processes, The utilization of bio-oil as a feedstock for hydrogen production presents both challenges and opportunities. The challenges include the presence of oxygen in bio-oil, which leads to increased water-gas shift and reforming reactions, as well as catalyst deactivation due to coke formation. However, the high hydrogento- carbon ratio of bio-oil and the possibility of co-producing valuable chemicals during the process provide opportunities for efficient hydrogen generation.

Literature Review

Steam reforming is a widely employed method for hydrogen production from hydrocarbon feedstocks. The process involves the reaction of hydrocarbons with steam in the presence of a catalyst, resulting in the production of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. The reforming reactions can be endothermic and require an external heat source. To simplify the analysis and study the thermodynamic behaviour of hydrogen production from bio-oil, model compounds representing its key constituents can be used. Common model compounds include acetic acid, furfural, and phenol. These compounds possess similar functional groups and reactivity to those found in bio-oil. The thermodynamic analysis involves calculating the equilibrium composition of the gas phase during the steam reforming of model compounds of bio-oil. Thermodynamic equilibrium models, such as the Gibbs free energy minimization approach, can be employed to determine the equilibrium composition as a function of temperature, pressure, and steam-to-carbon ratio [1-3].

Discussion

By minimizing the Gibbs free energy of the system, the equilibrium composition of the gas phase can be determined. This analysis provides information on the optimal conditions for hydrogen production, as well as the distribution of byproducts and possible coke formation. In addition to thermodynamic equilibrium, the reaction kinetics play a crucial role in determining the overall process efficiency. The rate of steam reforming reactions can be modelled using kinetic expressions, which consider the catalyst activity and the effect of temperature and reactant concentrations on the reaction rates. Sensitivity analysis allows for the investigation of the influence of various parameters on the hydrogen production process. It helps identify the key factors affecting the system performance, such as temperature, pressure, steam-to-carbon ratio, and catalyst properties [4-6].

Conclusion

The temperature and pressure have a significant impact on the hydrogen production efficiency. Higher temperatures promote the reforming reactions but can also lead to increased by-product formation. The pressure affects the equilibrium composition and the reaction kinetics, influencing the overall process performance. The steam-to-carbon ratio plays a crucial role in hydrogen production from bio-oil model compounds. An optimal steam-to-carbon ratio can be determined to maximize the hydrogen yield and minimize the formation of by-products. A comparison between hydrogen production from bio-oil model compounds and conventional hydrocarbon fuels can provide insights into the viability of bio-oil as a feedstock. The results may indicate the potential advantages and disadvantages of bio-oil-based hydrogen production compared to existing methods. An assessment of the environmental impact is essential to evaluate the sustainability of hydrogen production from bio-oil. The analysis considers greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and potential.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Primartha, Rifkie, Bayu Adhi Tama, Azhary Arliansyah and Kanda Januar Miraswan. "Decision tree combined with PSO-based feature selection for sentiment analysis."JPCS. IOP Publishing, (2019).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Holland, John H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT press, (1992).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Hamian, Melika, Ayda Darvishan, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh and  Milad Janghorban Lariche, et al. "A framework to expedite joint energy-reserve payment cost minimization using a custom-designed method based on mixed integer genetic algorithm." Eng Appl Artif  Intell  72 (2018): 203-212.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ghosh, Tarun Kumar, Sanjoy Das and Nabin Ghoshal. "Job scheduling in computational grid using a hybrid algorithm based on genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization." In Recent Advances in Intelligent Appl Math Inf Sci (2020): 873-885.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Keshavarz, Hamidreza and Mohammad Saniee Abadeh. "ALGA: Adaptive lexicon learning using genetic algorithm for sentiment analysis of microblogs." Knowl Based Syst  122 (2017): 1-16.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Mane, Sunil B and Sharan Vhanale. "Genetic algorithm approach for obstacle avoidance and path optimization of mobile robot." ICCASP (2018): 649-659.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at