In Silico Approaches for Forming Microbial Consortiums with Anaerobic Fungi

Hong Li^*
*Correspondence: Hong Li, Department of Microbiology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA, Email:

Keywords

Anaerobic fungi • In silico methods • Microbiome

Introduction

Anaerobic fungi are specialized microorganisms residing in the digestive tracts of herbivores, particularly in the rumen, where they play a crucial role in breaking down complex plant biomass. These fungi produce a range of enzymes capable of degrading cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, positioning them as promising candidates for industrial applications like biofuel production. However, their biomass degradation efficiency can be significantly improved through the formation of consortiums with other microorganisms.In this article, we delve into the use of in silico methods to identify potential microbial partners for anaerobic fungi and the advantages of creating microbial consortiums to enhance biomass degradation. In silico techniques, such as metabolic modeling, enable the prediction of metabolic capabilities and interactions between anaerobic fungi and potential partners. By analyzing the metabolic pathways of these organisms, researchers can pinpoint compatible microbes that complement the metabolic requirements of anaerobic fungi. For instance, certain bacteria can produce enzymes that convert complex sugars into simpler forms, which anaerobic fungi can then further degrade. Forming consortiums with such bacteria can enhance the degradation of a broader range of substrates. Additionally, these partnerships can improve biomass degradation efficiency by leveraging the distinct capabilities of different microorganisms. For example, some bacteria are capable of degrading lignin, a complex and resistant polymer that anaerobic fungi struggle to break down. Collaborating with these bacteria allows anaerobic fungi to access lignin-derived sugars, thereby enhancing their overall degradation efficiency [1,2].

Literature Review

While in silico methods provide valuable insights for predicting microbial interactions, translating these predictions into practical applications presents several challenges. One major difficulty is the inherent complexity of microbial communities, which can vary widely in composition and structure. Additionally, microbial interactions are influenced by environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and substrate availability, complicating the prediction of how consortiums will perform under different conditions. Despite these challenges, in silico methods remain a promising tool for identifying potential microbial partners for anaerobic fungi and forming effective consortiums for biomass degradation. By elucidating the metabolic interactions between anaerobic fungi and other microbes, researchers can design consortiums that enhance biomass degradation efficiency. This approach holds significant potential for advancing biofuel production and other industrial applications, as anaerobic fungi play a crucial role in breaking down lignocellulosic biomass in herbivores' digestive tracts. Their integration into biotechnological processes could lead to more sustainable and efficient solutions in renewable energy and beyond [3,4].

Discussion

Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data provide a comprehensive view of the microbial communities present in various environments, such as the rumen of herbivores where anaerobic fungi thrive. By analyzing these datasets, researchers can identify potential microbial partners based on their genetic and functional profiles. Metagenomic data mining involves sequencing the collective genomes of all microorganisms in a given environment. This approach helps identify the presence of anaerobic fungi and their potential microbial partners by analyzing the abundance and diversity of genes involved in biomass degradation and metabolic processes. Metatranscriptomic profiling involves sequencing the RNA transcripts from a microbial community, providing insights into active metabolic pathways and gene expression levels. This method can identify microorganisms that are actively interacting with anaerobic fungi and contributing to biomass degradation. Genome-scale metabolic models are computational frameworks that represent the metabolic networks of microorganisms. GEMs can be used to predict the metabolic interactions between anaerobic fungi and potential microbial partners, allowing for the design of synergistic consortia. To construct GEMs, researchers integrate genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to create a comprehensive map of an organism’s metabolic pathways. For anaerobic fungi and their partners, GEMs can predict the flow of metabolites and identify potential metabolic bottlenecks. Flux balance analysis is a mathematical approach used to analyze the flow of metabolites through a metabolic network. By applying FBA to GEMs, researchers can predict the optimal metabolic interactions and the potential for improved biomass degradation and product formation in consortia [5,6].

Conclusion

Synthetic biology and bioinformatics tools enable the design and optimization of microbial consortia through in silico approaches. These tools can simulate the interactions between different microorganisms and predict the outcomes of various consortium configurations. The COBRA (Constraint- Based Reconstruction and Analysis) Toolbox is a widely used software package for analyzing GEMs. It provides tools for constructing, analyzing, and simulating metabolic networks, allowing researchers to explore the interactions between anaerobic fungi and potential microbial partners. OptCom is a computational framework that allows for the optimization of metabolic interactions within microbial communities. It integrates GEMs of multiple microorganisms to simulate and optimize the performance of microbial consortia, helping identify the best combinations of anaerobic fungi and their partners. However, the full potential of anaerobic fungi is often limited by their metabolic capabilities and growth conditions. To overcome these limitations, the development of microbial consortia with anaerobic fungi and compatible microbial partners can enhance biomass degradation efficiency and overall metabolic outputs. This article explores in silico methods to identify microbial partners that can synergize with anaerobic fungi, creating robust and efficient consortia for various industrial applications.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Risner, Derrick, Elizabeth Tomasino, Paul Hughes and Lisbeth Meunier-Goddik. "Volatile aroma composition of distillates produced from fermented sweet and acid whey." J Dairy Sci 102 (2019): 202-210.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Jun, Joon‐Young, Min‐Jeong Jung, In‐Hak Jeong and Gwang‐Woo Kim, et al. "Effects of crab shell extract as a coagulant on the textural and sensorial properties of tofu (soybean curd)." Food Sci Nutr 7 (2019): 547-553.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Gys, Celine, Michiel Bastiaensen, Liesbeth Bruckers and Ann Colles, et al. "Determinants of exposure levels of bisphenols in flemish adolescents."Environ Res 193 (2021): 110567.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Hazelwood, Lucie A., Jean-Marc Daran, Antonius JA Van Maris and Jack T. Pronk, et al. "The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: A century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism." Appl Environ Microbiol 74 (2008): 2259-2266.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Díez-Antolínez, Rebeca, María Hijosa-Valsero, Ana I. Paniagua-García and Jerson Garita-Cambronero, et al. "Yeast screening and cell immobilization on inert supports for ethanol production from cheese whey permeate with high lactose loads." PLoS One 13 (2018): e0210002.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Rodrigues, Brígida, Maria Emília Lima-Costa, A. Constantino and Sara Raposo, et al. "Growth kinetics and physiological behavior of co-cultures of S. cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis, fermenting carob sugars extracted with whey." Enzyme Microb Technol 92 (2016): 41-48.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at