Induced Bone Fusion in a Rat Model of Lumbar Spinal Fusion using Lactoferrin-Anchored Tannylated Mesoporous Silica Nanomaterials

Aoeotr Yooin^*
*Correspondence: Aoeotr Yooin, Department of Spine Surgery, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China, Email:

Introduction

Lumbar spinal fusion is a common surgical procedure used to treat various spinal conditions. However, achieving successful bone fusion in the lumbar region can be challenging, and there is a constant quest for innovative strategies to improve fusion outcomes. This article explores the use of lactoferrin-anchored tannylated mesoporous silica nanomaterials as a promising approach to enhance bone fusion in a rat model of lumbar spinal fusion. We discuss the background of spinal fusion, the potential of nanomaterials in promoting bone regeneration, and the specific benefits of lactoferrin-anchored tannylated mesoporous silica nanomaterials. Additionally, we review recent studies and findings, demonstrating the potential of this nanomaterial-based approach in improving the success of lumbar spinal fusion. Lumbar spinal fusion is a surgical procedure aimed at stabilizing and promoting bone fusion in the lumbar spine to alleviate pain and correct deformities caused by various spinal conditions, including degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. A successful fusion outcome relies on various factors, including the patient's overall health, surgical technique, and the use of materials that enhance bone regeneration [1-3].

Description

Recent advancements in materials science and nanotechnology have opened up new avenues for improving bone fusion in spinal surgery. Nanomaterials, with their unique properties and potential for targeted drug delivery, have gained attention for their use in promoting bone regeneration. In this article, we explore the application of lactoferrin-anchored tannylated mesoporous silica nanomaterials as a promising strategy to enhance bone fusion in a rat model of lumbar spinal fusion. To fully grasp the significance of this approach, it is essential to understand the basics of spinal fusion and the potential of nanomaterials in bone regeneration. Spinal fusion is a surgical procedure that involves joining two or more vertebrae together to create a single, solid bone structure. This fusion is achieved through the use of various materials, including autografts (bone from the patient's own body), allografts (donor bone), and synthetic materials like metal implants or bone graft substitutes. The primary goal of spinal fusion is to eliminate motion at the targeted vertebral segment, alleviate pain, and promote bone fusion [4,5]. However, the lumbar spine, in particular, presents challenges in achieving a successful fusion due to the unique biomechanical stresses and dynamic movements it undergoes. Factors such as pseudarthrosis (failure of bone fusion) can lead to postoperative complications and reduced patient outcomes [6].

Conclusion

Lumbar spinal fusion is a challenging surgical procedure, and the quest for innovative strategies to enhance bone fusion outcomes continues. The application of lactoferrin-anchored tannylated mesoporous silica nanomaterials represents a promising approach to address this issue. These nanomaterials offer targeted drug delivery, sustained release, enhanced cellular adhesion, biocompatibility, and osteoinductive properties, all of which are crucial in promoting bone regeneration and fusion. Recent studies in rat models have demonstrated the potential of this approach, opening up new possibilities in spinal surgery. While there are challenges and further research needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these nanomaterials in clinical settings, the potential benefits they offer for lumbar spinal fusion are substantial. As we continue to advance in the field of nanotechnology and regenerative medicine, the use of nanomaterials like lactoferrin-anchored tannylated mesoporous silica could revolutionize the future of spinal fusion procedures, improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Reid, Jeremy J., Jared S. Johnson and Jeffrey C. Wang. "Challenges to bone formation in spinal fusion." J Biomech 44 (2011): 213-220.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Glassman, Steven D., David W. Polly, Christopher M. Bono and Kenneth Burkus, et al. "Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older." JBJS 91 (2009): 783-790.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Patel, Vikas V., Zachary R. Wuthrich, Alicia Ortega and Virginia L. Ferguson, et al. "Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein–2 Improves Spine Fusion in a Vitamin D–Deficient Rat Model." Int J Spine Surg 14 (2020): 694-705.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Benzel, Edward, Lisa Ferrara, Shuvo Roy and Aaron Fleischman. "Micromachines in spine surgery." Spine 29 (2004): 601-606.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Lee, Jae Yong, Hyunwoong Lim, Jae Won Ahn and Dongsik Jang, et al. "Design of a 3D BMP-2-delivering tannylated PCL scaffold and its anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and osteogenic effects in vitro." Int J Mol Sci 19 (2018): 3602.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Cornish, Jillian and Dorit Naot. "Lactoferrin as an effector molecule in the skeleton." Biometals 23 (2010): 425-430.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at