GET THE APP

Industrial and Agricultural Wastes Recycled as Coarse Aggregates
..

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering

ISSN: 2165-784X

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 4

Industrial and Agricultural Wastes Recycled as Coarse Aggregates

Dianchao Zhang*
*Correspondence: Dianchao Zhang, Department of Engineering, Tongji University, Siping Road, Shanghai, P.R. China, Email:
Department of Engineering, Tongji University, Siping Road, Shanghai, P.R. China

Received: 05-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. jcde-22-66307; Editor assigned: 07-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-66307; Reviewed: 19-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-66307; Revised: 24-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-66307; Published: 29-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2165-784X.22.12.447
Citation: Zhang, Dianchao. “Industrial and Agricultural Wastes Recycled as Coarse Aggregates.” J Civil Environ Eng 12 (2022): 447.
Copyright: © 2022 Zhang D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Sources of funding : None

Introduction

As aggregates are mined on a bigger scale, mountains and ecosystems are depleted. Artificial stone aggregates made from industrial waste are a cleaner alternative to natural stone aggregates. Although artificial aggregates have been used in previous research, a full analysis of the performance of alternative aggregates in concrete is quite restricted. As a result, the focus of this study is on repurposing waste materials from the agricultural and industrial sectors to make alternative coarse aggregates. The effect of replacing coarse aggregate with agricultural and industrial wastes such as furnace slag, oil palm shell, coconut shell, waste ceramic tiles, glass, expanded polystyrene, lightweight expanded clay aggregate, and recycled concrete aggregate on the fresh, hardened, and durability properties of concrete has been investigated.

The use of ceramic waste and steel slag as coarse aggregates lowered the workability of concrete, but recycled concrete aggregates, oil palm shell, and expanded polystyrene boosted it. The water absorption of different aggregates used in concrete determines its workability. The characteristics of artificial coarse aggregates are determined by the binder type and dosage used in the manufacturing process. The sintering temperature determines the characteristics of sintered aggregates. Alternative coarse aggregates had lower crushing strength, which resulted in a drop in compressive strength and an increase in the replacement level. Sintered and cold bonded aggregates used in concrete show a reduction in density [1,2].

About the Study

High demand for natural resources as a result of rapid urbanisation, as well as the challenge of disposing of agricultural waste in industrialised countries, has provided potential for agro-waste to be used in building. Many agricultural waste materials are already substituted for cement, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate and reinforcing components in concrete. Some of the agrowaste components that are utilised in concrete as a partial replacement for fine aggregate. Groundnut shell, oyster shell, cork, rice husk ash, and tobacco waste were shown to have superior workability in agro-waste concrete. Bagasse ash, sawdust ash, and oyster shell replaced 20% of the fine aggregate in agro-waste concrete to meet the required strength, which was the highest among all agro-waste concrete types.

Groundnut shell ash, saw dust ash, rice husk ash, coconut shell ash, oyster shell ash, and other agro-waste materials are utilised in the creation of concrete with superior durability and workability than original concrete. It also helps to solve environmental issues. When compared to using 100 percent cement, using 10-20 percent ash with cement has a lower cost. Portland cement is a type of cement. Partially substituting waste materials for concrete may minimise costs and pollutants while also protecting the environment from agro-waste such as rice husk, sawdust, and crushed nut shell [3].

Sugarcane bagasse ash, crushed nut shell, saw dust, rice husk ash, and cork and tobacco waste are among the agricultural wastes utilised as fine aggregate in concrete. The location from which this agro-waste was gathered and converted into a fine aggregate is the difference. The goal of this study is to look at the different features of agricultural wastes that can be utilised as a partial replacement for concrete, such as workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The association between concrete made from various agricultural waste sources and ecologically friendly concrete was also investigated. This article looks at some of the agro-waste products that are utilised in concrete as a partial replacement for fine aggregate. Recycling such trash into longlasting, energy-efficient building materials is a viable solution to pollution and natural resource conservation for future generations. The information gathered about hydrothermal performance will aid manufacturers and researchers in developing new construction materials [4].

By constructing a grading system, sustainable infrastructure and green building rating systems independently examine numerous different areas of infrastructure or building design, construction, and/or upkeep. All of the factors discussed are directly or indirectly related to a building's efficiency and environmental performance. Environmental considerations in the selection of materials used at each stage of the construction process can have an impact on the outcome's long-term viability. These effects can be direct (such as utilising an asbestos-free material) or indirect (such as recycling and diverting waste from landfills) [5].

Conclusion

The feasibility of making concrete made entirely of recycled materials utilising coal fly ash (FA) or granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) activated by waste water from concrete production and lime residue from a slaked lime factory's waste as the binder, rather than traditional Portland cement. Recycled concrete, crushed brick, recycled bottle glass, and sediments were used in place of traditional aggregates in varied amounts. To improve the fresh characteristics of the concretes, used cooking oil was added as an additive. Several concrete formulas were evaluated in terms of their fresh and hardened qualities. The findings suggest that concretes made entirely of recycled resources are possible to make. Long-term performance of the GGBS with slaked lime binder could be quite good, especially when used with recycled concrete aggregates. At 9.5 months, the dry concretes may reach compressive strengths of up to 37 MPa. Attempts to increase workability by adding admixture (e.g. used oil) or using less absorbent aggregates (e.g. discarded glass) yielded mixed results, and more research is needed to limit strength loss.

References

  1. Musa, Bushra Hosni. "Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composite Reinforced by Agricultural Wastes." Diyala J For Pure Sci 13 (2017).
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  3. Bheel, Naraindas, Shanker Lal Meghwar, Samiullah Sohu, and Ali Raza Khoso, et al. "Experimental study on recycled concrete aggregates with rice husk ash as partial cement replacement." Civil Eng J 4 (2018): 2305-2314.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Suhaendi, Sofren Leo, and Takashi Horiguchi. "Effect of short fibers on residual permeability and mechanical properties of hybrid fibre reinforced high strength concrete after heat exposition." Cem Concr  Res 36 (2006): 1672-1678.
  6. Santos, Cristina Calmeiro, and João Paulo C. Rodrigues. "Compressive strength at high temperatures of a concrete made with recycled tire textile and steel fibers." In MATEC Web of Conferences 6, EDP Sciences (2013).
  7. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  8. Long, Hoang Vinh. "Influence of coarse aggregates and mortar matrix on properties of lightweight aggregate concretes." GEOMATE J 19 (2020): 1-7.
  9. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1798

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering received 1798 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward