GET THE APP

Industrial Biosensors
..

Industrial Engineering & Management

ISSN: 2169-0316

Open Access

Opinion - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 4

Industrial Biosensors

Laurent Ana*
*Correspondence: Laurent Ana, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Centre for Management Studies, Spain, Email:
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Centre for Management Studies, Spain

Received: 05-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. iem-22-66177; Editor assigned: 07-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-66177; Reviewed: 12-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-66177; Revised: 18-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-66177; Published: 23-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2169-0316.22.11.346
Citation: Ana, Laurent. “Industrial Biosensors.” J Ind Eng Manag 11 (2022): 346.
Copyright: © 2022 Ana L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Biosensors of many varieties, such as enzyme-based, tissue-based, immunosensors, DNA biosensors, thermal, and piezoelectric biosensors, have been discussed to emphasize their critical uses in a variety of sectors. Under the new market economy scenario in the new era, coupled with the continued growth of science and technology and its wide application, industrial engineering technology and productivity have greatly improved. There are two types of phenolic resin: thermosetting phenolic resin (PF) and thermoplastic phenolic resin (PF). Since the middle ages, people have used these polishes to embellish and protect artwork, musical instruments, and furniture. Natural varnishes are limited in their ability to make viscous resins. A wide range of biosensor setups has been investigated, with applications ranging from fermentation monitoring to separation process control to shelf-life prediction and quality assurance. Biocatalysts and bioreceptors are the two broad groups of biological components.

Description

Biosensor fabrication, materials, transducing devices, and immobilization procedures all necessitate multidisciplinary research in chemistry, biology, and engineering. Biosensor materials are divided into three types based on their mechanisms: biocatalytic, which includes enzymes, bio affinity, which includes antibodies and nucleic acids, and microbe-based, which includes microorganisms. The pioneers Clark and Lyons invented biosensors in the 1960s. Enzyme-based, tissue-based, immunosensors, DNA biosensors, and thermal and piezoelectric biosensors are among the several types of biosensors employed. Updike and Hicks published the first enzyme-based sensor in 1967.

Immobilization methods, such as van der Waals forces, ionic bonding, or covalent bonding, have been used to develop enzyme biosensors. Oxidoreductases, polyphenol oxidases, peroxidases, and amino oxidases are some of the most widely employed enzymes for this function. Divvies created the first microbe-based or cell-based sensor. Plant and animal tissues are used to make tissue-based sensors. The analyte of interest could be either a substrate or an inhibitor of these activities. Membranes, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and microsomes were used to create organelle-based sensors. However, while the stability of this form of biosensor was good, the detection time was longer, and the specificity was lower [1-3].

Biosensors have been used in a variety of industries, including the food industry, the medical profession, and the marine sector, and they give superior stability and sensitivity than traditional approaches. Biosensor technology has advanced significantly in recent years and is now widely used in a variety of scientific sectors, including medicine, although it has yet to fulfil its full potential. Despite the important contributions biosensors have made to academic research, only a few biosensors have found commercial success. This is due to the difficulty of translating academic research into economically viable prototypes. Nanotechnology will most certainly merge with biosensors in the future, ushering in a new era of technology. Biosensors' electrochemical, optical, magnetic, and mechanical properties could all benefit from nanomaterials. They may also aid in the development of single molecule biosensors, which will be critical in revealing crucial information on the structure and function of biological systems at the single molecule level.

Process safety and product quality are critical in the fermentation industry. To build, optimize, and maintain biological reactors at optimal efficacy, effective fermentation process monitoring is required. Biosensors can be used to detect process conditions indirectly by monitoring the presence of products, biomass, enzymes, antibodies, or by-products. Because of their simple instrumentation, strong selectivity, low pricing, and ease of automation, biosensors perfectly manage the fermentation sector and produce repeatable results [4,5].

Conclusion

Several types of commercial biosensors are now available; they can detect biochemical parameters (glucose, lactate, lysine, ethanol, and so on) and are widely utilized in China, accounting for about 90% of the market. The classic Fehling’s method was used to detect saccharification during the fermentation process. Because this procedure includes lowering sugar titration, the results were erroneous. The fermentation industries, on the other hand, have benefited since the commercial launch of glucose biosensors in 1975. Glucose biosensors are now used to control production in the saccharification and fermentation workshop, and the bio enzymatic approach is used to create glucose.

REFERENCES

  1. Hart, John P., Adrian Crew, Eric Crouch and Roy M. Pemberton. "Some recent designs and developments of screen‐printed carbon electrochemical sensors/biosensors for biomedical, environmental, and industrial analyses." Anal Lett 37 (2004): 789-830.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Vashist, Sandeep Kumar, A.G. Venkatesh and Roland Zengerle. "Nanotechnology-based biosensors and diagnostics: technology push vs. industrial/healthcare requirements." Bionanosci 2 (2012): 115-126.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Klos-Witkowska, Aleksandra. "Enzyme-based fluorescent biosensors and their environmental, clinical and industrial applications." Pol J Environ Stud 24 (2015).
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Bogani, Patrizia, Maria Minunni and Marco Mascini. "Transgenes monitoring in an industrial soybean processing chain by DNA-based conventional approaches and biosensors." Food Chem 113 (2009): 658-664.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Rozzi, Alberto, Elena Ficara, C.M. Cellamare, and G. Bortone. "Characterization of textile wastewater and other industrial wastewaters by respirometric and titration biosensors." Water Sci Technol 40 (1999): 161-168.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 739

Industrial Engineering & Management received 739 citations as per Google Scholar report

Industrial Engineering & Management peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward