Industry Report on Adoption of AI and Machine Learning-A Strategic Framework Approach

Hemendra Pal^*
*Correspondence: Hemendra Pal, Department of Economics and Management Sciences, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India, Tel: 9310260181, Email:

Keywords

AI adoption • Strategic frameworks • BCG-matrix • GE-McKinsey matrix • GE nine box matrix • Balanced scorecard • Global industry analysis • Comparative analysis • Organizational behavior • Performance evaluation • Decision making • Product development and innovation • Customer behavior • Industry clusters

Introduction

Conduct an extensive review on industry reports, and case studies on AI adoption strategies and the application of strategic frameworks. Gather industry data from case studies, financial data, and annual reports etc.

Global industry analysis: Analyze the AI adoption strategies employed by organizations across different industries using the BCG-matrix, GE-McKinsey matrix, GE nine box matrixes, balanced scorecard, and other relevant strategic frameworks [1].

Conduct in-depth analysis of selected organizations to provide detailed insights into their AI adoption strategies and the application of strategic frameworks and future recommendations [2].

Research questions

• Organizational decisions to prioritize and allocate resources for AI adoption based on the BCG-matrix and GE-McKinsey matrix?
• Organizational decisions to assess and manage the potential risks and benefits associated with AI adoption using the GE nine box matrix?
• Organizational decisions to measure and evaluate the performance and impact of AI adoption through the balanced scorecard framework?
• Key strategic industry practices for industry clusters for formulating and executing AI adoption strategies?

Expected outcomes

Practical insights: Provide valuable insights and best practices for organizations worldwide in formulating and implementing AI adoption strategies through the application of strategic frameworks.

Comparative analysis: Compare and contrast the AI adoption strategies employed by organizations across different industries, highlighting key considerations based on internal processes perspective, learning and growth perspective, decision making, automation, personalization and consumer experience, product development and innovation.

Performance evaluation: Demonstrate how the balanced scorecard framework can be utilized to measure and evaluate the performance and impact of AI adoption initiatives and future recommendations based on organization clusters.

Risk assessment: Illustrate the use of the GE nine box matrixes in assessing and managing the risks associated with AI adoption [3].

Literature Review

Balanced scorecard as a strategic management tool to assess AI/machine learning initiatives helps in identifying areas of improvement, setting targets, and tracking progress over time. This approach enables companies to ensure that, their AI initiatives contribute to the organization's long-term success and drive sustainable value creation.

Internal processes perspective

• Identify key internal processes that can benefit from AI/ machine learning, such as automation, predictive analytics, or optimization.
• Measure the efficiency and effectiveness of AI-driven processes.
• Track process improvements and cost savings resulting from AI implementation.

Learning and growth perspective

• Evaluate the organization's AI/machine learning capabilities, including talent acquisition and development, technology infrastructure, and data management.
• Assess the organization's ability to adapt and learn from AI initiatives.
• Measure employee engagement and satisfaction related to AI adoption (Table 1).

Table 1. Balanced scorecard analysis-High, medium, and low performance metrics.

Enhanced decision-making

AI/machine learning algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and generate insights that support informed decision-making. Thus organizations are enabled to make choices backed by data driven analysis and strategic insights based on evidence, leading to improved outcomes and reduced risks [4].

Efficient automation

AI/machine learning technologies can automate routine tasks, streamline processes, and optimize resource allocation. By reducing manual efforts and augmenting human capabilities, organizations can achieve greater efficiency, productivity, and cost savings.

Personalization and customer experience

AI/machine learning enables companies to analyze customer data and preferences, delivering personalized recommendations, tailored products/services, and personalized marketing campaigns. This fosters customer satisfaction, loyalty, and engagement.

Innovation and product development

AI/machine learning techniques facilitate rapid experimentation, prototyping, and iterative improvement of products and services [5]. They enable organizations to uncover new insights, develop innovative solutions, and create competitive differentiation (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2. Balanced scorecard analysis: High, medium, and low performance metrics.

Table 3. BCG matrix analysis: Stars, cash cows, question marks, and dogs.

Discussion

Evaluation of the growth potential and market share of companies in each category

Stars: "Stars" category companies are characterized with high market growth potential and high market share. These companies have made significant investments in AI/machine learning and have established themselves as leaders in the industry. They have strong financial resources and a track record of successful innovation, allowing them to capitalize on the growth opportunities in the AI space [6].

Cash cows: "Cash cows" category companies are characterized with low market growth potential and high market share. These companies have already established a dominant position in the market and generate substantial revenue from their existing AI/ machine learning offerings. They have a solid customer base and can leverage their strong financial position to invest in further advancements and expansion of their AI capabilities.

Question marks: "Question marks" category companies are characterized with high market growth potential and low market share. These companies are investing in AI/machine learning but have yet to achieve significant market penetration. They face competition from established players but have the opportunity to differentiate themselves through innovation and strategic partnerships.

Dogs: "Dogs" category companies are characterized with low market growth and low market share. These companies have limited investments in AI/Machine Learning and struggle to compete with the market leaders. They face challenges in terms of innovation, customer adoption, and financial resources. Strategic considerations are needed to determine if there are opportunities for turnaround or if divestment is a more suitable option.

Strategic recommendations for companies in each quadrant to maximize their AI/machine learning capabilities

Stars

• Should have sustained investment in research and development for maintaining a competitive edge in AI/machine learning.
• Foster collaborations with academia, startups, and industry experts should foster collaborations and partnerships for driving innovation and for exploring new applications.
• Enhance customer experience by leveraging AI to personalize products and services. Expand into new markets and industries by leveraging AI capabilities.
• Continuously upgrade infrastructure and talent pool to support advanced AI algorithms and technologies.

Cash cows

• Focus on sustaining and optimizing existing AI/machine learning offerings to maintain market leadership.
• Explore opportunities for incremental innovations and improvements to enhance customer value.
• Leverage the financial strength to invest in acquisitions or strategic partnerships to expand AI capabilities.
• Optimize operational efficiency and cost structure to maximize profitability.
• Develop a roadmap for diversification into new AI-based products or services to capture emerging market trends.

Question marks

• Conduct in-depth market research to identify niche segments with high growth potential. Invest in talent acquisition and development to build AI expertise.
• Foster partnerships with early adopters and industry influencers to gain market traction. Develop agile and flexible business models to adapt to evolving market dynamics.
• Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of AI initiatives to make informed investment decisions.

Dogs

• Evaluate the potential for strategic partnerships or collaborations to access AI capabilities.
• Consider divestment or exit strategies for underperforming AI initiatives.
• Focus on core competencies and areas where the company has a competitive advantage. Explore opportunities for technology licensing or joint ventures to monetize existing AI assets.
• Develop a long-term strategic plan for transitioning the business towards higher growth areas outside of AI/ machine learning (Table 4).

Table 4. This diagram illustrates the relative positioning of the companies based on their AI/machine learning investments.

This diagram illustrates the relative positioning of the companies based on their AI/machine learning investments. The leaders are positioned in the high-growth, high-market share quadrant, and the challengers in the medium-growth, high-market share quadrant, the followers in the medium-growth, low-market share quadrant, and the laggards in the low-growth, low-market share quadrant.

This framework helps assess a company's strategic position by evaluating its business units based on industry attractiveness and competitive strength. In the context of AI/machine learning adoption, the nine-box matrix can identify companies as leaders, challengers, followers, or laggards based on their current initiatives and market positioning (Tables 5-7).

Table 5. This framework helps assess a company's strategic position by evaluating its business units.

Table 6. GE matrix: AI industry top 30 companies.

Table 7. GE matrix: Top 30 AI/machine learning companies.

GE matrix showcasing the top industry companies, on the basis of their market presence and innovation, company's business analyzed based on their market attractiveness competitive position.

GE/McKinsey matrix is a strategic tool used for portfolio analysis, represented as a 2 × 2 matrix with market attractiveness on one axis and Business Strength on the other axis. Based on the positioning in the four quadrants.

Cows (Low market attractiveness, high business strength): Dominant market share, comparatively slower growth. Require less investment and generate cash flow for the organization.

Dogs (Low market attractiveness, low business strength): Low market share, low growth potential may drain resources and hence require careful evaluation for divestment.

Questions (High market attractiveness, low business strength): Operate in high market attractiveness, but have not reached profitability or strong market position, and require strategic investments.

Stars (High market attractiveness, high business strength) : Stars experience rapid growth and make gains with substantial profits. Stars require continuous investments to sustain long term growth and profitability.

Conclusion

The study draws on excellent practical insights from top Industry companies decision making, comparative analysis for industry benchmark and best practices, including measuring and evaluating the performance and impact of AI adoption initiatives, future recommendations based on organization clusters and recommendations for investment or divestments based on risk analysis and assessment. Thus, this study provides a very good direction for organizational middle and top management for their Clevel decision making and recommendations. The study also provides a high level assessment for the opportunities for management consultancies and executive recruiters and human resources for their future recruitment initiatives.

References

1. Sharma, Ajit, Zhibo Zhang, and Rahul Rai. "The interpretive model of manufacturing: a theoretical framework and research agenda for machine learning in manufacturing." Int J Prod Res 59 (2021): 4960-4994.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. Cioffi, Raffaele, Marta Travaglioni, Giuseppina Piscitelli, and Fabio de Felice, et al. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in smart production: Progress, trends, and directions." Sustainability 12 (2020): 492.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

3. Mukhamediev, Ravil I, Yelena Popova, Yan Kuchin, and Adilkhan Symagulov, et al. "Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges." Mathematics 10 (2022): 2552.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Ma, Liye, and Baohong Sun. "Machine learning and AI in marketing–Connecting computing power to human insights." Int J Res Mark 37 (2020): 481-504.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Nguyen, Duc Khuong, Georgios Sermpinis, and Charalampos Stasinakis. "Big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning: A transformative symbiosis in favour of financial technology." Eur Financ Manage 29 (2023): 517-548.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Carter, A, S Imtiaz, and GF Naterer. "Review of interpretable machine learning for process industries." Process Saf Environ Prot 170 (2023): 647-659.

   [Crossref]