Infectious Complications in Emergency General Surgery: A Mini Review

Crotan D. Martin^*
*Correspondence: Crotan D. Martin, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA, Email:

Keywords

Emergency general surgery • Infection • Patient care

Introduction

Infectious complications in EGS contribute substantially to morbidity and mortality rates. Postoperative Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), Intra-Abdominal Infections (IAIs), and Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) are among the most common infectious complications encountered. The incidence varies depending on the type of procedure, patient comorbidities, and healthcare setting. Studies have reported SSI rates ranging from 5% to 30% in EGS patients, with higher rates observed in emergency colorectal surgeries and contaminated procedures. Epidemiological data reveals a substantial incidence of infectious complications in EGS, varying depending on surgical procedure and patient characteristics [1]. Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) occur in 5% to 30% of cases, with higher rates in emergency colorectal surgeries and contaminated procedures. Intra-Abdominal Infections (IAIs) also pose a significant burden, particularly in cases of perforation or peritonitis. Healthcare- Associated Infections (HAIs) further contribute to the epidemiological landscape, highlighting the importance of infection prevention measures. Understanding the epidemiology of infectious complications underscores the need for targeted interventions to mitigate their impact on patient outcomes.

Literature Review

Several factors predispose EGS patients to infectious complications. Host-related factors such as advanced age, malnutrition, immunosuppression, and comorbidities like diabetes and obesity increase the risk of infections. Emergency surgeries often involve contaminated or dirty wounds, increasing the likelihood of SSIs and IAIs. Prolonged operative times, inadequate antimicrobial prophylaxis, and suboptimal perioperative care further contribute to the risk. Additionally, the urgency of EGS procedures may limit preoperative optimization, increasing the vulnerability of patients to infectious complications. Advanced age, often accompanied by diminished physiological reserves and impaired immune function, predisposes individuals to higher rates of postoperative infections. Malnutrition, commonly encountered in critically ill patients, compromises wound healing and immune response, heightening susceptibility to infections.

Immunosuppression, whether due to underlying medical conditions or medications, impairs the body's ability to mount an effective defense against pathogens, exacerbating the risk of infectious complications. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and obesity contribute to a pro-inflammatory state and impaired tissue perfusion, fostering an environment conducive to infection development [2]. The nature of emergency surgeries frequently entails procedures on contaminated or dirty wounds, increasing the likelihood of SSIs and IAIs. The presence of foreign bodies, devitalized tissue, or fecal contamination further amplifies the risk of postoperative infections. Prolonged operative times, often necessitated by the complexity or severity of the underlying condition, heighten the exposure of patients to potential pathogens and increase the risk of nosocomial infections. Inadequate antimicrobial prophylaxis, including inappropriate choice, dosage, or timing of antibiotics, compromises the efficacy of infection prevention strategies [3].

Suboptimal perioperative care, encompassing factors such as inadequate fluid resuscitation, insufficient pain control, and delayed mobilization, impairs host defenses and predisposes patients to infectious complications. Addressing these risk factors through comprehensive preoperative assessment, optimization of modifiable variables, and adherence to evidence-based practices is paramount in reducing the incidence of infectious complications in EGS.

Discussion

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols tailored to EGS patients have shown promise in reducing postoperative complications, including infections. These protocols emphasize a multimodal approach encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions aimed at optimizing patient outcomes. Preoperatively, emphasis is placed on patient education, nutritional optimization, and smoking cessation to enhance physiological reserves and expedite recovery. Intraoperatively, meticulous attention to surgical technique, perioperative fluid management, and judicious antimicrobial prophylaxis are integral components of ERAS protocols. Minimally invasive techniques, when feasible, are favored due to their association with reduced surgical trauma, decreased postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays. Intraoperative strategies to minimize surgical site contamination, such as the use of barrier techniques and antimicrobial-coated sutures, further contribute to infection prevention efforts [4].

Postoperatively, early mobilization, multimodal pain management, and proactive management of complications are central tenets of ERAS protocols. Enhanced surveillance for signs of infection, coupled with prompt initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy when indicated, facilitates timely intervention and mitigates the progression of infectious complications. Furthermore, interdisciplinary collaboration involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, nursing staff, and infectious disease specialists are essential for the successful implementation of ERAS protocols in EGS. Continuous quality improvement initiatives, guided by robust data collection and analysis, facilitate the refinement of protocols to optimize patient outcomes and minimize infectious complications.

Early recognition and prompt management of infectious complications are essential for optimal outcomes in Emergency General Surgery (EGS). Timely initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting likely pathogens based on the clinical scenario and culture results is paramount to prevent the progression of infections and mitigate associated morbidity and mortality. Close monitoring of clinical parameters, such as fever, leukocytosis and signs of sepsis, enables clinicians to identify patients at risk for infectious complications and intervene promptly [5].

Surgical intervention may be necessary for source control in cases of complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (IAIs) or abscess formation. Minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopy and image-guided drainage have revolutionized the management of intra-abdominal sepsis, offering several advantages over traditional open surgery. These minimally invasive approaches facilitate precise localization and drainage of infected fluid collections while minimizing surgical trauma and preserving tissue integrity. Patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures experience reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to those undergoing open surgery. In addition to surgical intervention and antimicrobial therapy, supportive measures such as fluid resuscitation, nutritional support, and hemodynamic optimization play a crucial role in the management of infectious complications in EGS. Multidisciplinary collaboration involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, intensivists and other healthcare professionals is essential to ensure coordinated care and optimize patient outcomes.

Infectious complications remain a significant challenge in emergency general surgery, necessitating comprehensive strategies for prevention and management. Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors, coupled with adherence to evidence-based practices, can help mitigate the burden of infections in this patient population. Further research is warranted to refine preventive measures, optimize perioperative care [6], and improve outcomes for EGS patients. By implementing a multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgeons, infectious disease specialists, anesthesiologists and nursing staff, healthcare providers can strive towards reducing the incidence and impact of infectious complications in EGS.

Conclusion

Infectious complications remain a significant challenge in emergency general surgery, necessitating comprehensive strategies for prevention and management. Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors, coupled with adherence to evidence-based practices, can help mitigate the burden of infections in this patient population. Further research is warranted to refine preventive measures, optimize perioperative care, and improve outcomes for EGS patients. By implementing a multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgeons, infectious disease specialists, anesthesiologists and nursing staff, healthcare providers can strive towards reducing the incidence and impact of infectious complications in EGS.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Bugnon-Reber, A. V., A. De Torrenté, N. Troillet and D. Genne. "Antibiotic misuse in medium-sized Swiss hospitals." Swiss Med Wkly 134 (2004): 481-485.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

2. Lim, Mun Kit, Pauline Siew Mei Lai, Sasheela Sri La Sri Ponnampalavanar and Sharifah Faridah Syed Omar, et al. "Antibiotics in surgical wards: Use or misuse? A newly industrialized country’s perspective." J Infect Dev Ctries 9 (2015): 1264-1271.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Montravers, Philippe, Florence Tubach, Thomas Lescot and Benoit Veber, et al. "Short-course antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: The DURAPOP randomised clinical trial." Intensive Care Med 44 (2018): 300-310.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Roberts, Jason A., Sanjoy K. Paul, Murat Akova and Matteo Bassetti, et al. "DALI: Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients: Are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients?" Clin Infect Dis 58 (2014): 1072-1083.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Timsit, Jean-François, Matteo Bassetti, Olaf Cremer and George Daikos, et al. "Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: A narrative review." Intensive Care Med 45 (2019): 172-189.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Regimbeau, Jean Marc, David Fuks, Karine Pautrat and Francois Mauvais, et al. "Effect of postoperative antibiotic administration on postoperative infection following cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: A randomized clinical trial." Jama 312 (2014): 145-154.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at