Innovations in Intraoral Oxygen Saturation Monitoring: Advancements in SpO₂ Measurement Systems

Bandra Linlong^*
*Correspondence: Bandra Linlong, Department of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA, Email:

Introduction

The measurement of Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂) is crucial in various medical settings, providing valuable information about tissue oxygenation and respiratory function. Traditional methods of SpO₂ monitoring typically involve the use of finger probes or pulse oximeters placed on the skin. However, these external devices may not always be suitable or convenient, particularly in certain clinical scenarios such as oral surgeries or procedures [1]. To address this limitation, innovations in intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems have emerged, offering a more convenient and reliable approach to monitor oxygen saturation levels within the oral cavity. In this paper, we explore the development of these innovative intraoral SpO₂ measurement systems, their advantages, limitations and potential applications in clinical practice. To address these challenges, innovative intraoral SpO₂ measurement systems have been developed, offering a novel approach to monitoring oxygen saturation levels directly within the oral cavity. These systems represent a significant advancement in SpO₂ monitoring technology, providing clinicians with real-time feedback on tissue oxygenation levels in a convenient and non-invasive manner. In this paper, we delve into the evolution and development of intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems, exploring their design, functionality, advantages and potential applications in clinical practice. By examining the unique capabilities of these intraoral monitoring systems, we aim to highlight their role in enhancing patient care, particularly in settings where traditional external monitoring methods may be impractical or suboptimal [2].

Description

Intraoral SpO₂ measurement systems utilize specialized probes or sensors designed to be placed inside the oral cavity, providing real-time monitoring of oxygen saturation levels. These systems typically consist of a compact sensor attached to a flexible cable connected to a monitor or data acquisition device. The sensor is placed in close proximity to oral mucosa or gingival tissue, allowing for accurate SpO₂ measurements without the need for external probes or cumbersome equipment. One of the key advantages of intraoral SpO₂ monitoring is its ability to provide continuous and reliable oxygen saturation readings during oral procedures, surgeries, or interventions where traditional external monitoring methods may be impractical or unreliable. Additionally, intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems offer enhanced patient comfort and compliance compared to external devices, as they do not interfere with mobility or cause discomfort associated with prolonged skin contact [3].

These innovative systems have demonstrated promising results in various clinical settings, including dental surgeries, oral and maxillofacial procedures and intensive care units. By providing clinicians with real-time feedback on tissue oxygenation levels within the oral cavity, intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems enable timely interventions to optimize patient outcomes and minimize the risk of hypoxia-related complications. One of the key features of intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems is their ability to provide continuous and accurate oxygen saturation measurements directly from oral mucosa or gingival tissue. Unlike traditional external monitoring methods, which rely on skin contact and may be affected by factors such as movement artifacts or poor perfusion, intraoral sensors offer a more direct and reliable assessment of tissue oxygenation levels. These innovative monitoring systems are particularly well-suited for use in oral surgeries, dental procedures and other interventions involving the oral cavity, where traditional external monitoring methods may be impractical or inconvenient. By providing clinicians with immediate feedback on tissue oxygenation levels within the oral cavity, intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems facilitate timely interventions to optimize patient safety and outcomes [4].

Moreover, intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems have demonstrated versatility in various clinical settings, including intensive care units, emergency departments and procedural sedation environments. Their non-invasive nature and ease of use make them valuable tools for continuous oxygen saturation monitoring in patients undergoing critical care or procedural interventions. Overall, intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems represent a significant advancement in SpO₂ monitoring technology, offering clinicians a convenient, reliable and non-invasive method for assessing tissue oxygenation levels within the oral cavity. As these systems continue to evolve and improve, they hold great promise for enhancing patient care and safety across a wide range of clinical settings [5].

Conclusion

Innovations in intraoral SpO₂ monitoring represent a significant advancement in the field of oxygen saturation monitoring, offering a convenient, reliable and non-invasive approach to assess tissue oxygenation levels within the oral cavity. These systems have the potential to improve patient care in a wide range of clinical settings, from dental surgeries to critical care environments, by enabling continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation during procedures and interventions. Further research and development efforts are warranted to enhance the accuracy, usability and accessibility of intraoral SpO₂ monitoring systems, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and enhanced quality of care.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

1. Koseeyaporn, Jeerasuda, Paramote Wardkein, Ananta Sinchai and Pattana Kainan, et al. "Pulse oximetry based on quadrature multiplexing of the amplitude modulated photoplethysmographic signals." Sensors 23 (2023): 6106.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Nitzan, Meir, Ayal Romem and Robert Koppel. "Pulse oximetry: Fundamentals and technology update." Med Devices (2014): 231-239.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Banik, Partha Pratim, Shifat Hossain, Tae-Ho Kwon and Hyoungkeun Kim, et al. "Development of a wearable reflection-type pulse oximeter system to acquire clean PPG signals and measure pulse rate and SpO₂ with and without finger motion." Electronics 9 (2020): 1905.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Chan, Edward D., Michael M. Chan and Mallory M. Chan. "Pulse oximetry: Understanding its basic principles facilitates appreciation of its limitations." Respir Med 107 (2013): 789-799.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. MacLeod, D. B., L. I. Cortinez, J. C. Keifer and D. Cameron, et al. "The desaturation response time of finger pulse oximeters during mild hypothermia." Anaesthesia 60 (2005): 65-71.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Budidha, Karthik and P. A. Kyriacou. "In vivo investigation of ear canal pulse oximetry during hypothermia." J Clin Monit Comput 32 (2018): 97-107.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at