GET THE APP

Innovative Digital Stochastic Methods in Air Pollution Modeling
..

Environmental & Analytical Toxicology

ISSN: 2161-0525

Open Access

Commentary - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 4

Innovative Digital Stochastic Methods in Air Pollution Modeling

Manuel Lerdau*
*Correspondence: Manuel Lerdau, Department of Environmental Sciences and Biology, University of Virginia, USA, Email:
Department of Environmental Sciences and Biology, University of Virginia, USA

Received: 03-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. jeat-22-67283; Editor assigned: 05-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-67283; Reviewed: 10-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-67283; Revised: 17-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-67283; Published: 23-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0525.2022.12.653
Citation: Lerdau, Manuel. “Innovative Digital Stochastic Methods in Air Pollution Modeling.” J Environ Anal Toxicol 12 (2022): 653.
Copyright: © 2022 Lerdau M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Much of the globe now has a regional air pollution policy in place to regulate and reduce pollution levels across governmental boundaries and control their impact on human health and natural systems. Globally, environmental conservation is one of the top objectives. There are several hurdles in this study field since it is a painful matter for society and a critical problem for the healthcare system. Sensitivity analysis is critical for the validation of large-scale air pollution computational models to verify their correctness and dependability. We use the finest stochastic algorithms available for multidimensional sensitivity analysis of the UNI-DEM model, which is critical in the management of the various self-governed systems and data that serve as the foundation for forecasting and evaluating the repercussions of probable climate change.

Description

In many fields, mathematical models are used as convincing tools for exploring composite processes, but our knowledge is typically limited by uncertainties: inexact data, imprecise comprehension and subjective estimations, for example. As a result, tools are required to predict how input uncertainties impact particular output model outputs. Our effort is aimed at improving environmental security. Modern mathematical models of distant transmission of air pollution should include a large number of chemical and photochemical processes in order to establish themselves as a trustworthy simulation tool. Monte Carlo techniques are the most effective tool for simulating multidimensional air pollution [1,2].

In many fields, mathematical models are used as convincing tools for exploring composite processes, but our knowledge is typically limited by uncertainties: inexact data, imprecise comprehension and subjective estimations, for example. As a result, tools are required to predict how input uncertainties impact particular output model outputs. Our effort is aimed at improving environmental security. Modern mathematical models of distant transmission of air pollution should include a large number of chemical and photochemical processes in order to establish themselves as a trustworthy simulation tool. Monte Carlo techniques are the most effective tool for simulating multidimensional air pollution.

Sensitivity analysis (SA) is the study of how much uncertainty in a model's input data (due to faulty assessments, estimates and data compression, for example) is represented in the accuracy of the output findings. SA is a powerful approach for verifying and improving mathematical models. It highlights the critical function of SA when mathematical modelling is typically the sole technique for investigating a complex issue. Furthermore, the genuine explanation of SA calculations is dependent on the efficacy of systems delivering SA [3].

The performance of the algorithms may be generalised as follows: the two digital sequences presented by the authors give the least relative errors for all sensitivity indices; algorithm MCA-MSS-2 comes next, followed by SOBOLSEQUENCE, MCA-MSS-1 and LATTICE-CBC. MCA-MSS-2-S and LATTICEFIBO yield the poorest outcomes. When compared to the findings produced in, the key advantages of our approaches include a considerable improvement in accuracy and lower computing complexity.

Based on the comparison with other sensitivity studies and papers already published in the field, the general conclusion from our discussion is that the main advantages of the proposed methods LATTICE-FIBO, LATTICE-CBC, DIGITAL-SOBOL and DIGITAL-XINGN for the very important large-scale air pollution model UNI-DEM are much higher accuracy and lower computational complexity. The current study is in a critical area of environmental safety. High amounts of pollution may affect ecosystems and injure plants, animals and humans; hence it is critical to accurately investigate pollution levels. That is why it is necessary to determine if pollution levels are below some crucial values and, if so, to build a solid control mechanism to keep pollution levels below these limits. The suggested extremely efficient stochastic techniques for assessing the sensitivity of various pollution-related processes can successfully address these issues [4].

The two suggested digital sequences based on Sobol and Xing- Niederreiter matrices outperform the best extant results generated by modified Sobol sequences. The authors' recommended techniques, LATTICE-CBC, DIGITAL-SOBOL and DIGITAL-XNING, have been established as the new best available stochastic methods for this highly significant large-scale air pollution model, UNI-DEM [5].

Conclusion

The collected findings will aid in the testing and improvement of the mathematical models, as well as provide a well-founded explanation by the appropriate professionals. Physicists and chemists will be able to obtain essential information to enhance the model by detecting the primary chemical processes that impact the system's performance, increasing the reliability and sustainability of forecasts. As a result of our sensitivity results, the mathematical model will help to a more accurate assessment of agricultural losses and, more crucially, will allow for a calculation of the impact of hazardous emissions on human health.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Gery, Michael W., Gary Z. Whitten, James P. Killus and Marcia C. Dodge, et al. "A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling." J Geophys Res 94 (1989): 12925-12956.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Homma, Toshimitsu and Andrea Saltelli. "Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models." Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52 (1996): 1-17.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Ostromsky, Tzvetan, Ivan Dimov, Zahari Zlatev and Rayna Georgieva, et al. "Air pollution modelling, sensitivity analysis and parallel implementation." Int J Environ Pollut 46 (2011): 83-96.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Fidanova, Stefka, Petar Zhivkov and Olympia Roeva. "Intercriteria analysis applied on air pollution influence on morbidity." Mathematics 10 (2022): 1195.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Caflisch, Russel E. "Monte carlo and quasi-monte carlo methods.Acta Numer 7 (1998): 1-49.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 6818

Environmental & Analytical Toxicology received 6818 citations as per Google Scholar report

Environmental & Analytical Toxicology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward