Innovative Dry Treatment for Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash to Reduce Salts and Toxic Elements

Peter Toth^*
*Correspondence: Peter Toth, Department of Sustainable Resource and Waste Management, University of Kosice, Vysokoskolska 4, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia, Email:

Introduction

The escalating challenge of managing Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in urban areas has become a critical focus for environmental sustainability and public health. With increasing urbanization, consumption patterns and population growth, the volume of waste generated continues to rise, necessitating more efficient waste management solutions. Incineration has emerged as a popular method due to its effectiveness in reducing waste volume and generating energy [1]. However, this process generates residual materials, particularly bottom ash, which contains soluble salts and toxic elements that pose significant environmental risks. Bottom ash, comprising approximately 10-20% of the waste volume, can lead to soil and groundwater contamination when its harmful constituents leach into the environment. Traditional treatment methods often fall short in addressing these issues, highlighting the need for innovative dry treatment technologies that effectively reduce the leachability of salts and toxic elements in bottom ash, making it safer for reuse or disposal [2].

Description

Innovative dry treatment technologies for bottom ash encompass various methodologies aimed at mitigating the environmental impact of this residual material. Physical stabilization techniques focus on modifying the physical properties of bottom ash through processes such as particle size reduction, screening and the use of binding agents. Particle size reduction minimizes the surface area exposed to leachate, thereby decreasing leachability. Screening techniques facilitate the separation of larger particles from finer ash fractions, allowing for targeted treatment of contaminants. Additionally, incorporating binding agents like cement enhances the structural stability of bottom ash while encapsulating harmful constituents, making it suitable for construction applications [3].

Chemical treatment methods aim to alter the chemical composition of bottom ash to neutralize harmful components. Neutralization of soluble salts, through the addition of acids or bases, transforms these contaminants into less soluble forms, thereby reducing their leachability. Heavy metal stabilization employs various reagents to convert toxic metals into less mobile or less harmful compounds, enhancing the safety of the treated ash. Advanced oxidation processes represent another innovative approach, utilizing strong oxidants to degrade organic contaminants and stabilize inorganic compounds, further improving treatment efficiency [4]. Biological treatment methods, including microbial bioremediation and phytoremediation, leverage the natural capabilities of microorganisms and plants to detoxify hazardous components in bottom ash. Microbial bioremediation utilizes specific bacteria and fungi to metabolize toxic substances, while phytoremediation employs hyper accumulator plants to absorb and store heavy metals, contributing to the stabilization of bottom ash. Combining these methodologies into sequential or hybrid treatment processes can yield more effective results, allowing for comprehensive treatment that addresses the complex composition of bottom ash [5].

Conclusion

The effective treatment of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash is essential for promoting sustainable waste management and safeguarding environmental health. Innovative dry treatment methods provide substantial opportunities for reducing the salts and toxic elements in bottom ash, facilitating its safe reuse and minimizing leachate contamination risks. By integrating physical, chemical and biological approaches, these technologies can transform bottom ash into a more environmentally friendly material. As urban areas continue to confront the challenges of waste management, the implementation of these innovative solutions will be crucial in advancing circular economy principles and ensuring long-term sustainability. Continued research and development in this field are imperative to optimize these technologies, enhance their applicability and contribute to a safer, more sustainable future for waste management practices.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Šyc, Michal, Franz Georg Simon, Jiri Hyks and Roberto Braga, et al. "Metal recovery from incineration bottom ash: State-of-the-art and recent developments." J Hazard Mater 393 (2020): 122433.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Van Praagh, M., M. Johansson, J. Fagerqvist and R. Grönholm, et al. "Recycling of MSWI-bottom ash in paved constructions in Sweden–A risk assessment." Waste Manag 79 (2018): 428-434.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Ginés, O., J. M. Chimenos, A. Vizcarro and J. Formos, et al. "Combined use of MSWI bottom ash and fly ash as aggregate in concrete formulation: Environmental and mechanical considerations." J Hazard Mater 169 (2009): 643-650.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Keulen, A. André Van Zomeren, P. Harpe and W. Aarnink, et al. "High performance of treated and washed MSWI bottom ash granulates as natural aggregate replacement within earth-moist concrete." Waste Manag 49 (2016): 83-95.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Blasenbauer, Dominik, Florian Huber, Jakob Lederer and Margarida J. Quina, et al. "Legal situation and current practice of waste incineration bottom ash utilisation in Europe." Waste Manag 102 (2020): 868-883.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at