Innovative Technology Combining Bioprinting and Electrospinning to Create a 3D Scaffold with Multiscale Channels

Jian Yang^*
*Correspondence: Jian Yang, Department of Electro-Mechanical Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, Email:

Introduction

In recent years, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising field aimed at addressing the critical need for functional tissue and organ replacements. Central to the success of tissue engineering strategies is the development of scaffolds that mimic the complex architecture and biological microenvironment of native tissues. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often struggle to replicate the intricate structures and functionalities required for successful tissue regeneration. However, recent advancements in bioprinting and electrospinning have paved the way for innovative approaches in scaffold design. This paper explores an integrated technology that combines bioprinting and electrospinning to create 3D scaffolds with multiscale channels. Bioprinting, leveraging precise deposition of biomaterials and cells, offers spatial control and versatility in scaffold design. Electrospinning, on the other hand, produces Nano fibrous structures with high surface area and porosity, enhancing cell attachment, proliferation and tissue integration. By merging these two techniques, researchers can engineer scaffolds that not only provide mechanical support but also promote cellular interactions and tissue regeneration through intricate multiscale channels. The integration of bioprinting and electrospinning represents a significant advancement in tissue engineering, offering new avenues for fabricating biomimetic scaffolds capable of supporting complex tissue structures and functions. This paper delves into the principles, methodologies, applications and future directions of this innovative technology, highlighting its potential to revolutionize biomedical research and clinical practice [1].

Description

Bioprinting involves the layer-by-layer deposition of bioinks containing biomaterials and cells, guided by Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models. This additive manufacturing approach allows for precise control over scaffold architecture, enabling the creation of complex geometries that closely mimic native tissues. Bioprinters utilize various deposition techniques, including extrusion-based, inkjet-based and laser-assisted methods, each offering unique advantages in terms of resolution, speed and compatibility with different biomaterials. Electrospinning, on the other hand, utilizes electrostatic forces to draw polymer solutions or melts into ultrafine fibers, typically in the nanometer to micro meter range. The resulting Nano fibrous structure features high porosity, large surface area and interconnected pores ideal for facilitating nutrient diffusion, waste removal and cell infiltration [2]. Electro spun fibers can be tailored in terms of diameter, alignment and composition to enhance mechanical properties and biological functionality, making them suitable for a wide range of tissue engineering applications. The integration of bioprinting and electrospinning combines the strengths of both techniques, allowing for the fabrication of scaffolds that integrate precise cell deposition with nanoscale fibrous networks. This hybrid approach enables researchers to design scaffolds with multiscale channels macroscopic channels for vascularization and microscale channels for cellular interactions essential for supporting tissue regeneration and functional tissue formation. The fabrication process begins with the design of a CAD model that defines the scaffold geometry and channel architecture [3].

Bioprinting is employed to deposit bioinks containing cells and biomaterials layer by layer according to the CAD blueprint. This process enables spatial control over cell distribution and scaffold composition, crucial for creating heterogeneous tissue constructs with defined mechanical and biological properties. Simultaneously, electrospinning is used to create Nano fibrous layers or coatings around the bioprinted structure. By electrospinning polymer solutions or melts onto the bioprinted scaffold, researchers enhance scaffold porosity and surface area while promoting cell adhesion and infiltration. The combined use of bioprinting and electrospinning allows for the integration of complex multiscale channels within the scaffold architecture, supporting tissue-specific functionalities such as nutrient transport, waste removal and cellular communication. Multiscale channels within the scaffold architecture play a critical role in tissue engineering by mimicking the hierarchical organization of native tissues [4]. Macroscopic channels are designed to simulate vascular networks or large-scale tissue structures, facilitating oxygen and nutrient delivery throughout the scaffold. These channels also promote vascularization a key challenge in tissue engineering by providing pathways for endothelial cell infiltration and capillary formation. Microscale channels, on the other hand, enhance cellular interactions and tissue organization at the cellular level. These channels enable precise control over cell alignment, migration and differentiation within the scaffold, supporting the development of functional tissues with organized cell layers and matrix deposition. The integration of multiscale channels ensures spatial and temporal control over biochemical and mechanical cues, essential for guiding tissue development and maturation [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of bioprinting and electrospinning represents a transformative approach in tissue engineering, offering unprecedented capabilities in scaffold design and fabrication. By combining the precision of bioprinting with the versatility of electrospinning, researchers can create 3D scaffolds with multiscale channels that closely mimic the complexity and functionality of native tissues. These advanced scaffolds provide mechanical support, promote cellular interactions and facilitate tissue regeneration through controlled nutrient transport and cellular communication. The development of multiscale channels within the scaffold architecture addresses longstanding challenges in tissue engineering, such as limited vascularization and inadequate tissue integration. This technology holds promise for a wide range of applications, including the regeneration of complex tissues and organs, disease modeling and drug screening. Future research efforts will continue to refine fabrication techniques, optimize scaffold design parameters and explore new biomaterial formulations to enhance scaffold performance and biocompatibility. As this innovative technology continues to evolve, it is poised to revolutionize biomedical research and clinical practice by enabling the creation of patient-specific tissue implants and constructs tailored to individual anatomical and physiological needs. Ultimately, the integration of bioprinting and electrospinning opens new avenues for advancing regenerative medicine, offering hope for improved treatments and therapies for patients worldwide.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Tian, Lei and Steven C. George. "Biomaterials to prevascularize engineered tissues." J Cardiovasc Transl Res 4 (2011): 685-698.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Lee, Vivian K., Diana Y. Kim, Haygan Ngo and Young Lee, et al. "Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology." Biomater 35 (2014): 8092-8102.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Zhao, Yu, Yang Li, Shuangshuang Mao and Wei Sun, et al. "The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology." Biofabrication 7 (2015): 045002.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ling, Yibo, Jamie Rubin, Yuting Deng and Catherine Huang, et al. "A cell-laden microfluidic hydrogel."Lab Chip 7 (2007): 756-762.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Hammer, Joshua, Li-Hsin Han, Xinming Tong and Fan Yang. "A facile method to fabricate hydrogels with microchannel-like porosity for tissue engineering." Tissue Eng Part C Methods 20 (2014): 169-176.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at