GET THE APP

Integrating Context: The Crucial Role of Workflow in Assessing AI Impact in Radiology
..

International Journal of Sensor Networks and Data Communications

ISSN: 2090-4886

Open Access

Brief Report - (2024) Volume 13, Issue 2

Integrating Context: The Crucial Role of Workflow in Assessing AI Impact in Radiology

Sobitha Nelson*
*Correspondence: Sobitha Nelson, Department of Information Technology, Sri Sairam Engineering College, Tamil Nadu, India, Email:
Department of Information Technology, Sri Sairam Engineering College, Tamil Nadu, India

Received: 01-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. sndc-24-127128; Editor assigned: 02-Mar-2024, Pre QC No. P-127128; Reviewed: 16-Mar-2024, QC No. Q-127128; Revised: 23-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. R-127128; Published: 30-Mar-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2090-4886.2024.13.261
Citation: Nelson, Sobitha. “Integrating Context: The Crucial Role of Workflow in Assessing AI Impact in Radiology.” Int J Sens Netw Data Commun 13 (2024): 261.
Copyright: © 2024 Nelson S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds immense promise in revolutionizing radiology, offering advanced tools for image analysis and diagnosis. However, recent studies have highlighted a disconnect between AI research and the practical realities of radiology work settings. This report examines the implications of AI implementation in radiology workflows, focusing on its effects on efficiency, time savings, and workflow adaptations.

Description

Despite the rapid advancement of AI technologies in radiology, many studies fail to consider the intricacies of the radiology work setting. This oversight undermines the applicability and effectiveness of AI solutions in real-world clinical environments. Understanding the context in which AI tools are implemented is crucial for assessing their impact on radiologist workflows and patient care outcomes [1]. A notable finding in recent research is the lack of time savings associated with Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) systems for prostate MRI readings. Despite the automation capabilities offered by AI, radiologists did not experience significant reductions in reading time. This unexpected outcome underscores the importance of evaluating AI technologies within the context of specific imaging modalities and clinical tasks [2].

Following the implementation of AI systems in radiology, changes in routine workflows have been observed. These changes may manifest in adjustments to reading protocols, consultation processes, or communication pathways within the radiology department. Understanding and documenting these workflow modifications are essential for assessing the overall impact of AI on radiologist efficiency and patient care delivery [3]. It becomes evident that the effectiveness of AI tools in radiology hinges on their seamless integration into existing workflow processes. Workflow implementation determines the practical utility and acceptance of AI solutions by radiologists and other healthcare professionals. Therefore, careful consideration of workflow dynamics, user interfaces, and interoperability with existing systems is imperative for maximizing the benefits of AI in radiology practice [4,5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the successful integration of artificial intelligence into radiology workflows requires a holistic approach that considers the unique challenges and requirements of clinical practice settings. By incorporating the work setting into AI studies, addressing workflow adaptations, and prioritizing user-centered design principles, radiologists can harness the full potential of AI to improve diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and patient outcomes in radiology. Continued research and collaboration between AI developers and radiology practitioners are essential for realizing the transformative impact of AI in radiology.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Hardy, Maryann and Hugh Harvey. "Artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: impact on the radiography profession." Br J Radiol 93 (2020): 20190840.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Strohm, Lea, Charisma Hehakaya, Erik R. Ranschaert and Wouter PC Boon, et al. "Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in radiology: hindering and facilitating factors." Eur Radiol 30 (2020): 5525-5532.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Do, Huy M., Lillian G. Spear, Moozhan Nikpanah and S. Mojdeh Mirmomen, et al. "Augmented radiologist workflow improves report value and saves time: a potential model for implementation of artificial intelligence." Acad Radiol 27 (2020): 96-105.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Mese, Ismail, Ceylan Altintas Taslicay and Ali Kemal Sivrioglu. "Improving radiology workflow using ChatGPT and artificial intelligence." Clin Imaging (2023): 109993.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Wenderott, Katharina, Jim Krups, Julian A. Luetkens and Nikoloz Gambashidze, et al. "Prospective effects of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system for prostate imaging on routine workflow and radiologists’ outcomes." Eur J Radiol 170 (2024): 111252.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 343

International Journal of Sensor Networks and Data Communications received 343 citations as per Google Scholar report

International Journal of Sensor Networks and Data Communications peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward