GET THE APP

Integrating Next-generation Sequencing with Traditional Diagnostic Methods: A Comprehensive Approach
..

Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2161-0703

Open Access

Perspective - (2024) Volume 13, Issue 4

Integrating Next-generation Sequencing with Traditional Diagnostic Methods: A Comprehensive Approach

Fidel Simonyan*
*Correspondence: Fidel Simonyan, Department of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC 20052, USA, USA, Email:
1Department of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC 20052, USA, USA

Published: 29-Jul-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0703.2024.13.475
Citation: Simonyan, Fidel. “Integrating Next-generation Sequencing with Traditional Diagnostic Methods: A Comprehensive Approach.” J Med Microb Diagn 13 (2024): 475.
Copyright: © 2024 Simonyan F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The integration of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) with traditional diagnostic methods represents a transformative leap in medical diagnostics. This comprehensive approach combines the high-throughput, detailed genomic insights of NGS with established diagnostic practices to enhance accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. This article explores how NGS is being integrated with traditional methods, the benefits and challenges of such integration and future prospects for improving patient care through a hybrid diagnostic approach. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the field of genomics by allowing for high-throughput, detailed analysis of genetic material. Unlike traditional sequencing methods, which can be time-consuming and limited in scope, NGS provides comprehensive insights into the genetic makeup of individuals. This technology has rapidly advanced, enabling the detection of genetic mutations, identifying disease predispositions and personalizing treatment plans. However, integrating NGS with traditional diagnostic methods such as histopathology, immunohistochemistry and biochemical assays offers a holistic approach that leverages the strengths of both methods [1].

Description

While these methods are established and widely used, they often provide limited information compared to the genomic insights offered by NGS. Their reliance on a narrow range of markers or cellular features can sometimes result in missed diagnoses or suboptimal treatment plans. NGS can analyse entire genomes or specific regions, providing a broad overview of genetic variations that might be missed by traditional methods. NGS can detect rare or previously unknown genetic mutations that may be critical for accurate diagnosis and treatment. By understanding the genetic basis of diseases, NGS enables the development of personalized treatment strategies tailored to the individual’s genetic profile. Combining NGS with traditional diagnostic techniques creates a comprehensive diagnostic approach that enhances the strengths of each method. Combining NGS with histopathology can improve the accuracy of cancer diagnoses. For instance, while histopathology provides information on tissue structure and cellular abnormalities, NGS can reveal underlying genetic mutations, leading to more precise cancer classification and targeted therapies. In autoimmune diseases, traditional methods like serological tests and clinical evaluation provide valuable information about disease activity and progression. NGS can complement these by identifying genetic predispositions or variations that influence disease severity and response to treatment [2].

NGS can identify genetic markers associated with disease prognosis. When combined with traditional biochemical assays, such as measuring tumour markers or hormone levels, clinicians can gain a more comprehensive understanding of disease progression and tailor treatment strategies accordingly. For patients with complex or rare diseases, integrating NGS with traditional methods helps in developing personalized treatment plans. For example, in oncology, traditional imaging and biopsy techniques can be combined with NGS data to select the most effective targeted therapies and monitor treatment responses more accurately. In breast cancer diagnosis, traditional methods like mammography and biopsy are complemented by NGS to identify genetic mutations associated with drug resistance or recurrence. This integrated approach allows for more accurate prognostication and personalized treatment plans. For inherited genetic disorders, traditional family history assessments and biochemical testing are combined with NGS to identify specific genetic mutations. This comprehensive approach enhances diagnostic accuracy and facilitates early intervention and personalized management. In the case of infectious diseases, traditional methods such as culture and serology are used alongside NGS to identify pathogen strains and resistance genes. This integration improves the accuracy of diagnosis and effectiveness of treatment [3,4].

NGS can be expensive and may not be accessible in all healthcare settings. Integrating it with traditional methods requires careful consideration of cost-effectiveness and resource allocation. The vast amount of data generated by NGS requires advanced bioinformatics tools and expertise for accurate interpretation. Integrating these data with traditional diagnostic results requires careful integration and validation. The integration of NGS with traditional methods raises regulatory and ethical considerations, such as data privacy, informed consent and the potential for incidental findings. Healthcare professionals need specialized training to effectively use and interpret NGS data alongside traditional diagnostic methods. Ensuring adequate training and support is crucial for successful integration. The future of integrating NGS with traditional diagnostic methods holds great promise. Advances in technology and decreasing costs are likely to make NGS more accessible and integrated into routine clinical practice. Additionally, the development of improved bioinformatics tools and interdisciplinary collaboration will enhance the interpretation and application of combined diagnostic data [5].

Conclusion

Integrating Next-Generation Sequencing with traditional diagnostic methods offers a comprehensive approach that enhances diagnostic accuracy, improves patient outcomes and enables personalized medicine. By leveraging the strengths of both NGS and traditional techniques, healthcare providers can achieve a more holistic understanding of diseases and tailor treatment strategies to individual patients. Despite challenges related to cost, data interpretation and ethical considerations, the benefits of this integrated approach make it a promising direction for the future of medical diagnostics.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Petrucelli, Monise Fazolin, Mariana Heinzen de Abreu, Bruna Aline Michelotto Cantelli and Gabriela Gonzalez Segura, et al. "Epidemiology and diagnostic perspectives of dermatophytoses." J Fungus 6 (2020): 310.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Gräser, Yvonne, Michel Monod, Jean-Philippe Bouchara and Karolina Dukik, et al. "New insights in dermatophyte research." Med Mycol 56 (2018): S2-S9.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Summerbell, Richard C., Elizabeth Cooper, Ursula Bunn and Frances Jamieson, et al. "Onychomycosis: A critical study of techniques and criteria for confirming the etiologic significance of nondermatophytes." Med Mycol 43 (2005): 39-59.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Brescini, Lucia, Simona Fioriti, Gianluca Morroni and Francesco Barchiesi. "Antifungal combinations in dermatophytes." J Fungus 7 (2021): 727.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Kim, Ji Young, Yong Beom Choe, Kyu Joong Ahn and Yang Won Lee. "Identification of dermatophytes using multiplex polymerase chain reaction." Ann Dermatol 23 (2011): 304.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 14

Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis received 14 citations as per Google Scholar report

Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward