GET THE APP

Integrative Oncology and its Impact on Treatment Outcomes: An Analysis of Complementary Therapies in Oncology Practice
..

Journal of Integrative Oncology

ISSN: 2329-6771

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 13, Issue 3

Integrative Oncology and its Impact on Treatment Outcomes: An Analysis of Complementary Therapies in Oncology Practice

Marvin Gabriel*
*Correspondence: Marvin Gabriel, Department of Integrative Oncology, Brandon University, 270 18th St, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada, Email:
Department of Integrative Oncology, Brandon University, 270 18th St, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada

Received: 01-May-2024, Manuscript No. jio-24-145583; Editor assigned: 02-May-2024, Pre QC No. P-145583; Reviewed: 17-May-2024, QC No. Q-145583; Revised: 22-May-2024, Manuscript No. R-145583; Published: 30-May-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2329-6771.2024.13.486
Citation: Gabriel, Marvin. “Integrative Oncology and its Impact on Treatment Outcomes: An Analysis of Complementary Therapies in Oncology Practice.” J Integr Oncol 13 (2024): 486.
Copyright: © 2024 Gabriel M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Integrative oncology represents a holistic approach to cancer care, combining conventional medical treatments with complementary therapies. This approach aims to enhance treatment outcomes, improve quality of life, and support overall well-being for patients undergoing cancer treatment. Integrative oncology represents a holistic approach to cancer care that blends conventional treatments with complementary therapies to enhance overall outcomes. This approach is designed to address the physical, emotional, and psychological needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment, aiming to improve their quality of life and treatment effectiveness. In practice, integrative oncology incorporates a variety of complementary therapies alongside traditional methods such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Commonly used complementary therapies include acupuncture, which helps alleviate pain and nausea; nutritional therapy, which supports the immune system and manages side effects through diet; and mind-body practices like mindfulness, meditation, and yoga, which reduce stress and improve mental well-being. Herbal medicine is also utilized to support immune function and manage symptoms, though it requires careful evaluation to avoid interactions with conventional treatments [1-3].

Description

Integrative oncology focuses on the whole person, addressing physical, emotional, and spiritual needs alongside traditional oncology treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. The core principles include:

Patient-centered care: Tailoring treatments to the individual’s unique needs, preferences, and circumstances.

Evidence-based approach: Incorporating complementary therapies with proven efficacy and safety profiles.

Multidisciplinary collaboration: Engaging a team of healthcare professionals, including oncologists, nutritionists, psychologists, and complementary therapy practitioners.

Complementary therapies

Complementary therapies commonly used in integrative oncology include:

Acupuncture: Often used to alleviate pain, nausea, and other side effects of conventional treatments.

Nutritional therapy: Tailoring diet to support the immune system, enhance energy levels, and manage side effects.

Mind-Body practices: Techniques such as mindfulness, meditation, and yoga can reduce stress, anxiety, and improve overall mental well-being.

Herbal medicine: Utilized to support immune function and manage symptoms, though careful evaluation is necessary to avoid interactions with conventional medications.

Impact on treatment outcomes

Research indicates that integrative oncology can have a positive impact on treatment outcomes:

Symptom management: Complementary therapies can significantly reduce side effects associated with cancer treatments, such as nausea, fatigue, and pain.

Quality of life: Enhanced symptom management and psychological support contribute to improved overall quality of life.

Emotional well-Being: Practices like meditation and counseling can alleviate anxiety and depression, leading to better patient satisfaction and adherence to treatment plans.

Challenges and considerations

Despite its benefits, integrative oncology faces challenges:

Evidence gaps: While some complementary therapies are wellresearched, others lack robust clinical evidence.

Integration into conventional care: Coordinating complementary therapies with conventional treatments requires careful management to avoid potential interactions.

Personalization: The efficacy of complementary therapies can vary widely among individuals, necessitating personalized approaches [4,5].

Conclusion

Integrative oncology represents a promising evolution in cancer care, aiming to improve treatment outcomes through a combination of conventional and complementary approaches. By focusing on comprehensive, patientcentered care and addressing both physical and emotional needs, integrative oncology can offer significant benefits in managing cancer and enhancing quality of life. On-going research and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to optimize these therapies and ensure their effective integration into standard oncology practice. Overall, integrative oncology represents a promising advancement in cancer care, focusing on a comprehensive approach that improves both physical and emotional well-being. Continued research and collaboration among healthcare professionals are essential to optimizing these therapies and integrating them effectively into standard oncology practice.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, Sunny Z., Daniel L. Roden, Ghamdan Al-Eryani and Nenad Bartonicek, et al. "Cryopreservation of human cancers conserves tumour heterogeneity for single-cell multi-omics analysis." Genome Med 13 (2021).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. De‐Kayne, Rishi, David Frei, Ryan Greenway and Sofia L. Mendes, et al. "Sequencing platform shifts provide opportunities but pose challenges for combining genomic data, sets."Mol Ecol Resour 21 (2021): 653–660.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Chu, Yongjun and David R. Corey. "RNA sequencing: Platform selection, experimental design, and data interpretation." Nucleic Acid Ther 22 (2012): 271–274.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Allali, Imane, Jason W. Arnold, Jeffrey Roach and Maria Belen Cadenas, et al. "A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome." BMC Microbiol 17 (2017): 194.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Slatko, Barton E., Andrew F. Gardner and Frederick M. Ausubel. "Overview of next‐generation sequencing technologies.” Curr Protoc Mol Biol 122 (2018).

    Google Scholar, Crossref,  Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 495

Journal of Integrative Oncology received 495 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Integrative Oncology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward