Intellectual Disabilities Genetics

Alesya Rania^*
*Correspondence: Alesya Rania, Department of Ophthalmology, HSE University, Boulevard Moscow, Russia, Email:

Keywords

Green bonds • Greenium • Yield determinants • European green market

Introduction

Encompassing the regional markets of Germany, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. The sample comprised 3851 corporate bonds from. Intellectual disability is defined by the created by the American Psychiatric Association, as a defect in intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviour that begins in the developmental period and affects three areas of daily life: first, the conceptual domain, which includes knowledge, reasoning, memory, and the capacity to write, read, and perform math; second, the social domain, which describes functioning in social interactions like maintaining friendships; and third, the adaptive domain. Based on adaptive functioning in the severity has been divided into mild, moderate, severe, and profound categories despite the exclusion of values, the matching

Literature Review

The process of getting an accurate clinical and genetic diagnosis, which is vital for the affected person, parents, family, and other carers, is complicated by the clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Getting a diagnosis makes it feasible to create a management strategy based on the information about the particular condition that is currently known. Nowadays, management relies on symptom monitoring and treatment, such as physical therapy, speech therapy, or antiepileptic medications in the case of epilepsy. A proper diagnosis also makes it possible for patients and their families to get in touch with other families, self-help organisations, or advocacy groups. Families may also have access to unique, condition-specific assistance initiatives. Research initiatives have focused on treatments for cognitive impairment as such, although they are not currently available, with the exception of a few [1].

The clinical and genetic variability makes it difficult to obtain a correct clinical and genetic diagnosis, which is essential for the affected person, parents, relatives, and other carers. Having a diagnosis makes it possible to develop a management strategy based on the knowledge that is currently available about the specific ailment. Nowadays, care is based on symptom observation and management, which may include physical therapy, speech therapy, or anti-epileptic drugs in the event of epilepsy. A correct diagnosis also enables patients and their families to connect with other families, selfhelp groups, or advocacy organisations. Families may also be able to take advantage of special, condition-specific support programmes. Research initiatives have focused on treatments for cognitive impairment as such, although they are not currently [2].

Discussion

In clinical genetics, phenotyping entails gathering comprehensive medical history and completing a complete physical examination that includes a thorough evaluation of the dysmorphology. A thorough family history is also gathered, even though it technically does not pertain to the patient's phenotype. Other tests, such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and metabolic screening are typically carried out on people with intellectual impairment. Making a differential diagnosis comes after the clinical work-up; when a patient meets specific requirements, a clinical diagnosis is made. If the gene is known, specific genetic testing is necessary. In well-known, clinically recognisable single-gene illnesses and several microdeletion/duplication syndromes, this phenotype-first strategy has had some success. For many years, a clinical diagnosis was the sole solution.

Although early chromosomal study using karyotyping was done in people suspected of having a particular condition, such trisomy, and was therefore a phenotype-first method, later karyotyping was utilised more widely in people with ID and congenital anomalies As a result, it can be said that the genotypefirst approach was the first to be effective in identifying big chromosomal rearrangements which account for of ID cases. Moreover, the early fragile X chromosome discovery provided an additional diagnostic result, affecting about 1% of boys with intellectual disability Also, it paved the path for linkage studies in large X-linked families with ID, which led to the discovery of approximately -chromosome genes associated [3-5].

Conclusion

It paved the path for linkage studies in large X-linked families with, which led to the discovery of approximately 140 X-chromosome genes associated with Fluorescence in situ hybridization which was created in the 1980s and was used to identify several of the "old" classical syndromes, including Williams syndrome and Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome in the , could detect smaller copy number variations than karyotyping. The multirole FISH was demonstrated to be extremely suited for identifying those subtelomeric deletions and duplications that accounted for of the diagnostic yield in persons following the publication of Flint et al. on subtelomeric abnormalities in connection to.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Valko, Marian, Dieter Leibfritz, Jan Moncol and Mark TD Cronin, et al. "Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease."Int J Biochem Cell Biol39 (2007): 44-84.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Baumeister, Christiane, Dimitris Korobilis and Thomas K. Lee. "Energy markets and global economic conditions." Rev Econ Stat 104 (2022):828-844

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Jakob, Doreen. "Crafting your way out of the recession? New craft entrepreneurs and the global economic downturn." Cambridge J Reg Econ Soc 6 (2013): 127-140.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Mazzitelli, Maria, Mariella Micieli, Carmela Votino and Federica Visconti, et al. "Knowledge of human Cytomegalovirus infection and prevention in pregnant women: A baseline, Operational Survey."Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2017 (2017).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Fujii, Hidemichi, Akihiko Shinozaki, Shigemi Kagawa and Shunsuke Managi. "How does information and communication technology capital affect productivity in the energy sector?" Energies 12 (2019): 1786.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at