Investigating the Environmental Impact of New Chemical Recycling Methods for Plastic Waste from Consumers

Xu Yang^*
*Correspondence: Xu Yang, Department of Environmental Science, University of Chang’an, Xi’an 710064, China, Email:

Introduction

Plan and improvement of the energy framework with the effective strategy is one the serious issue as of late. One of the new approaches chosen for the optimization of energy systems is the combined energy, exercise, economic, and environmental analysis. In the current paper, the optimal thermodynamic, economic, and environmental design was first developed; the geothermal power plant was utilized as a supplement to Concentrated Sun Oriented Power (CSP) and afterward joined emergy-exergy-financial natural examination was led. In order to generate the building's heating and cooling power, both a stand-alone geothermal cycle (first mode) and a hybrid geothermal-solar cycle (second mode) were investigated. Exergy and emerge-economic analysis's striking similarity to one another was very intriguing. Plastic waste has become a global environmental crisis, necessitating innovative approaches to address its disposal and recycling. New chemical recycling methods have emerged as potential solutions to transform consumer plastic waste into valuable resources. This article examines the environmental impact of these emerging chemical recycling techniques, exploring their potential benefits and assessing their challenges and considerations. Plastic waste has emerged as a significant environmental challenge in recent decades. Its widespread use, coupled with inefficient waste management practices, has led to its accumulation in landfills, water bodies, and natural environments worldwide.

Description

This article explores the impacts of plastic waste on the environment, human health, and potential solutions to mitigate this growing crisis. Plastic waste gradually breaks down into smaller particles known as micro plastics, which are pervasive in the environment. Micro plastics can be ingested by marine life and can potentially enter the food chain, posing risks to both wildlife and human health. Chemical recycling involves converting plastic waste into chemical building blocks or feedstock, enabling the production of new plastics or other valuable materials. Unlike traditional mechanical recycling, which has limitations in processing certain types of plastics, chemical recycling offers the potential to recycle a broader range of plastic waste, including mixed and contaminated plastics. Chemical recycling processes require energy inputs for depolymerisation, pyrolysis, or other conversion methods. Assessing the environmental impact involves evaluating the energy sources used, such as fossil fuels or renewable energy, and quantifying associated greenhouse gas emissions. Chemical recycling aims to reduce the demand for virgin feedstock’s by utilizing plastic waste as a valuable resource. By recovering and reusing plastics, these methods contribute to resource conservation and reduce the extraction of fossil fuels [1,2].

Evaluating the chemicals and solvents used in chemical recycling is crucial to minimize potential environmental hazards. Assessing the emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and other hazardous substances ensures that the process is environmentally friendly and safe. Waste Generation and Management: While chemical recycling aims to reduce plastic waste, it is important to assess any residual waste generated during the process. Proper management of by-products and residues is essential to prevent environmental contamination. Chemical recycling expands the scope of plastics that can be recycled, including mixed or contaminated plastics that are difficult to process mechanically. Chemical recycling can produce high-quality feedstock’s or plastics with properties comparable to virgin materials, supporting the development of sustainable products. By diverting plastic waste from landfills and incineration, chemical recycling contributes to waste reduction and promotes a circular economy [3].

Many chemical recycling methods are still in the early stages of development, requiring further research and optimization to improve efficiency and environmental performance. Scale and Infrastructure: Scaling up chemical recycling technologies and establishing appropriate infrastructure are crucial for their wider implementation. The cost-effectiveness and market competitiveness of chemical recycling methods are important factors in their widespread adoption. Conducting a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is essential for evaluating the environmental impact of chemical recycling methods. LCAs consider the entire life cycle of the process, from raw material extraction to end-of-life waste management. This assessment helps identify potential environmental hotspots and guides decision-making for maximum environmental benefits. Effective policies and regulations play a crucial role in supporting the development and adoption of chemical recycling technologies. Governments and regulatory bodies should establish clear guidelines, standards, and incentives to promote sustainable practices and ensure the safe and environmentally sound operation of chemical recycling facilities [4,5].

Conclusion

New chemical recycling methods hold promise for addressing the environmental challenges associated with consumer plastic waste. By converting plastic waste into valuable resources, these technologies offer a sustainable approach to waste management. However, further research and development, along with supportive policies and infrastructure, are needed to enhance the efficiency, economic viability, and environmental performance of these methods. By embracing chemical recycling, we can move towards a more sustainable future, reducing plastic waste and promoting a circular economy.

References

1. Zecchin, Aaron C., Angus R. Simpson, Holger R. Maier and Michael Leonard, et al. "Application of two ant colony optimisation algorithms to water distribution system optimisation." Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 44 (2006): 451-468.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Bi, Weiwei, Minjie Chen, Shuwen Shen and Zhiyuan Huang. "A many-objective analysis framework for large real-world water distribution system design problems." Water 14 (2022): 557.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Wu, Wenyan, Holger R. Maier and Angus R. Simpson. "Multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems accounting for economic cost, hydraulic reliability, and greenhouse gas emissions." Water Resour Res 49 (2013): 1211-1225.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Farmani, R., D. A. Savic and G. A. Walters. "Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design." Eng Optim 37 (2005): 167-183.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Prasad, T. Devi and Nam-Sik Park. "Multiobjective genetic algorithms for design of water distribution networks." J Water Resour Plan Manag 130 (2004): 73-82.

Google Scholar, Crossref