Investigation of P3HT Processing for In-liquid EGOFET Biosensors: Impact of Solvent Choice and Surface Characteristics

Ricardo Eduardo^*
*Correspondence: Ricardo Eduardo, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain, Email:

Introduction

P3HT is widely regarded as a cornerstone material in organic electronics due to its high charge carrier mobility, stability, and ease of processing. One of its promising applications lies in electrolyte-gated organic fieldeffect transistors, particularly for biosensing purposes. The unique ability of EGOFETs to operate in aqueous environments makes them ideal for detecting biological molecules, but this capability also brings challenges. Among these, the selection of processing solvents and the characteristics of the device surface significantly influence the performance of P3HT-based EGOFETs. This investigation delves into the interplay between these factors, aiming to understand how they impact device efficiency and stability. P3HT processing is inherently sensitive to the choice of solvent, as it dictates the material's microstructure, crystallinity, and interface properties. Solvents with different polarities, boiling points, and interaction strengths with P3HT chains can result in vastly different morphologies upon film deposition. Chlorinated solvents like chloroform and dichlorobenzene are commonly employed due to their strong solubility for P3HT and ability to produce uniform thin films. However, their volatile and toxic nature raises concerns, particularly for biosensing applications where biocompatibility is paramount. Alternative solvents, including non-chlorinated options like toluene and anisole, are being explored to balance performance with safety and environmental impact.

The solvent’s influence extends beyond simple film formation. It plays a pivotal role in determining the orientation of P3HT crystallites and the polymer's packing density. These factors directly affect the charge transport pathways, which are critical for the efficient functioning of EGOFETs. For instance, solvents that promote edge-on alignment of P3HT chains relative to the substrate tend to enhance charge carrier mobility due to better π-π stacking. Conversely, solvents that lead to a disordered arrangement can hinder charge transport, reducing device performance. Moreover, the solvent can impact the roughness and wetting behavior of the film, further influencing its interaction with the liquid electrolyte in EGOFET operation.

Description

The surface characteristics of the substrate are equally crucial in P3HTbased EGOFETs. The chemical and physical properties of the surface dictate how the polymer interacts during deposition and in subsequent device operation. Hydrophobic surfaces generally favour the formation of more ordered P3HT films, as the polymer chains can align more effectively without being disrupted by strong surface interactions. In contrast, hydrophilic surfaces might lead to irregularities or pinholes in the film due to non-uniform wetting. This uneven morphology can introduce defects that compromise charge transport and increase leakage currents during EGOFET operation. Functionalization of the substrate surface adds another layer of complexity and opportunity. By modifying the surface with self-assembled monolayers or other coatings, it is possible to tailor the surface energy and chemical compatibility with P3HT. For example, surfaces treated with alkyl silanes can create a hydrophobic environment that enhances the crystallinity of P3HT films. Conversely, using polar functional groups on the surface might be beneficial for specific biosensing applications where strong interactions with biomolecules are desired. Thus, the surface treatment must be carefully selected based on the intended application of the EGOFET.

The interplay between solvent and surface is particularly significant in in-liquid EGOFETs, where the device operates in an electrolyte solution. The electrolyte introduces additional challenges, such as potential swelling or delamination of the P3HT film, which can degrade device performance. Solvents that leave residual polar groups or weakly bonded regions in the P3HT film are more prone to such effects. Similarly, surfaces with poor adhesion to P3HT may exacerbate these issues, leading to instability in the presence of the electrolyte. Therefore, achieving a robust P3HT-substrate interface is crucial for reliable operation.

The electrochemical stability of P3HT is another critical factor influenced by both the solvent and the surface. In an EGOFET, the gate voltage applied through the electrolyte induces a double-layer capacitance at the polymerelectrolyte interface. This process can lead to doping and dedoping of P3HT, which, if not controlled, can cause degradation over time. Solvents that enable a denser packing of P3HT chains tend to reduce the extent of unwanted electrochemical reactions by limiting electrolyte penetration into the film. Similarly, surfaces that promote strong adhesion and minimal defects can help mitigate degradation pathways.

Beyond performance considerations, the biocompatibility of the solvent and surface treatment is essential for biosensor applications. Many traditional solvents and surface modification chemicals are toxic, posing risks to the biological samples being analyzed. Consequently, there is a growing push toward green solvents and benign surface treatments. For example, ethanol and water-based processing methods are gaining traction, despite the challenges they pose in achieving high-quality P3HT films. Balancing these constraints with the need for high-performance devices remains an ongoing challenge in the field. The optimization of P3HT processing for inliquid EGOFET biosensors requires a holistic approach. It is not sufficient to consider the solvent and surface in isolation; their combined effects must be taken into account. For instance, a solvent that produces excellent P3HT film properties on a generic substrate might fail when applied to a surface with specific functionalization. Similarly, a surface treatment that enhances P3HT adhesion might not work well with a particular solvent due to incompatibility in drying dynamics or chemical interactions.

Experimental studies on this topic typically involve characterizing the P3HT films using techniques like atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and UV-vis spectroscopy to assess their morphology, crystallinity, and optical properties. These analyses help elucidate the relationships between solvent choice, surface properties, and film quality. Additionally, electrical measurements of the EGOFETs provide insights into how these factors translate to device performance. Metrics such as charge carrier mobility, on/off ratio, and threshold voltage stability are commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of different processing conditions. Recent advancements in P3HT processing have explored the use of mixed solvents to combine the advantages of different solvent properties. For example, blending a highboiling- point solvent with a low-boiling-point one can enable controlled drying and improved film uniformity. Similarly, dynamic deposition techniques, such as spin-coating with solvent annealing, are being employed to refine the microstructure of P3HT films. On the surface side, novel approaches like nano patterning and bio-inspired coatings are opening new avenues for enhancing device compatibility with biological environments [1-5].

Conclusion

The processing of P3HT for in-liquid EGOFET biosensors is a multifaceted challenge that hinges on the careful selection of solvents and substrate surface properties. Both factors profoundly influence the morphology, stability, and performance of the P3HT film, ultimately determining the efficacy of the biosensor. As research progresses, a deeper understanding of these interactions will pave the way for more robust and reliable biosensing technologies, driving advancements in fields ranging from medical diagnostics to environmental monitoring.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Parmeggiani, Matteo, Alessio Verna, Alberto Ballesio, Matteo Cocuzza, Erik Piatti, Vittorio Fra, Candido Fabrizio Pirri, and Simone Luigi Marasso. "P3HT processing study for in-liquid EGOFET biosensors: effects of the solvent and the surface."Sens19 (2019): 4497.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Hao, Ruisha, Lei Liu, Jiangyan Yuan, Lingli Wu, and Shengbin Lei. "Recent advances in field effect transistor biosensors: Designing strategies and applications for sensitive assay."Biosens13 (2023): 426.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Parmeggiani, Matteo, Alberto Ballesio, Silvia Battistoni, Rocco Carcione, Matteo Cocuzza, Pasquale D’Angelo, Victor V. Erokhin et al. "Organic Bioelectronics Development in Italy: A Review."Micromachines14 (2023): 460.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Zeglio, Erica, and Olle Inganäs. "Active materials for organic electrochemical transistors."Adv Mater 30 (2018): 1800941.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Liao, Caizhi, and Feng Yan. "Organic semiconductors in organic thin-film transistor-based chemical and biological sensors."Polym Rev 53 (2013): 352-406.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at