Research Article - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 1
Received: 07-Jan-2022
Published:
27-Jan-2022
, DOI: 10.37421/1168/22.11.507
Citation: Mekuria, Filmona, Alemayehu Bekele and Tinebeb Seyouml. “Knowledge of Essential Newborn Care among Nurses and Midwives Working in Lideta Sub City Government Health Centers.” J Nurs Care 11(2022):507.
Copyright: © 2022 Mekuria F, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Introduction: Neonatal mortality constitutes a major public health problem. Ethiopia has made a great progress on institutionalization of deliveries where deliveries are mainly facilitated by midwives and nurses by providing essential newborn care. Hence, assessing the knowledge of these professionals is a primary concern. Therefore, this study is intended to identify knowledge gap on essential newborn care.
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge of essential newborn care and associated factors.
Methods: Facility based cross-sectional study was conducted. All nurses and midwives who provide delivery and neonatal care were involved in the study. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to participants to collect data and facilitated by data collectors. Data was entered to statistical package for social sciences version 21 and analyzed. Finally, the results were illustrated in the form of text, tables and graphs.
Results: The mean knowledge score of study participants was 12.66. The study revealed that 55% of the respondents had good knowledge of essential newborn care. Field of study was found to have significant association with the knowledge of essential newborn care
Conclusion: The study population had poor knowledge on some aspects of essential newborn care. Field of study was found to be independent predictor of knowledge. Therefore, strengthening and incorporation of all components of essential newborn care in the curriculum was recommended.
Knowledge • Essential new born care • Midwives • Nurses
The immediate neonatal period is the most crucial period for neonatal survival and subsequent well-being. Deliveries should be attended and facilitated by health care providers at the time of birth and after birth by providing essential new-born care [1]. Identification of high risk pregnancies and neonates requiring neonatal resuscitation is critical at this stage in delivery rooms, neonatology units and paediatric intensive care unit to safeguard the health and well-being of neonates. Skilled care during labour and childbirth with prompt management of complications alone can prevent about 50% of new-born mortality and 45% of intra-partum stillbirths [2,3]. Although neonatal death is multi-factorial, the most important causes of neonatal deaths are preterm birth, birth asphyxia, sepsis and pneumonia. Every new-born should be considered at a high risk of birth asphyxia since most cases of asphyxia cannot be predicted [3]. Therefore, WHO recommends ENC; is a compressive strategy to improve the health of new-borns through interventions before conception, during pregnancy, at and soon after birth and in the postnatal period [4]. The ENC protocol is a series of time bound and chronologically- ordered that a baby receives at birth and it has standardized effective procedural steps: dry and stimulate, evaluate breathing, cord care, keep the new born warm, initiate breastfeeding within the first one hour, administer eye ointment, administer vitamin K intramuscularly, place the new-born’s identification bands, weigh the new born when it is stable and warm, record all observations and treatment provided, delay bathing of the baby for 24 hrs. After birth as many as two-third of neonatal deaths can be saved with ENC [5]. New-borns are most vulnerable during the first hours and days of life, that is why this critical period should not be missed. Some non-breathing babies with primary apnea will respond to simple stimulation alone, such as drying and rubbing. Basic resuscitation with a bag and mask is required for an estimated 6 million of these babies each year, and is sufficient to resuscitate most neonates with secondary apnea, as their bradycardia primarily results from hypoxemia and respiratory failure. More advanced measures including endo-tracheal intubation, chest compressions and medications are required in <1% of births, and most of these babies require ongoing intensive care which is not available in most low income county settings [6-11]. Unless new-borns receive appropriate basic care, they quickly fall sick and too often they die [6]. Ethiopia is one of the ten countries with the highest number of neonatal deaths globally and neonatal mortality has remained stable around 28 deaths per 1000 live births in recent years. In Ethiopia, the main causes of neonatal deaths were birth asphyxia (31.6%), prematurity (21.8%), and sepsis (18.5%) in 2015 [7,8,12] Promotion of ENC is one strategy for improving new-born health outcomes [13]. This requires health system that provides continuity of care starting from the beginning of pregnancy and continuing through professional skilled care at birth into the postnatal period. But, the standardized procedure for providing ENC is not commonly practiced [14]. Knowledge is one of the most important aspects of health systems to adhere to ENC practices. But, in Ethiopia hospitals health workers’ mean knowledge score for immediate new-born care was relatively low [15]. In addition to this gaps, although midwives and nurses are providing primary care during pregnancy, labor, neonatal period and the post-partum period in all health facilities, still there only one study about knowledge of ENC among nurses and midwives in Addis Ababa. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to identify whether there is knowledge gap on essential new-born care among nurses and midwives [16].
Facility based cross-sectional study was conducted in 6 health centres found in Lideta sub city, Addis Ababa, from September 05 to October 25, 2019. To estimate the desired sample size, the following assumptions were made: proportion of knowledge of study participants on ENC was taken as 50% (p=0.5), level of significance was considered to be 5% (α=0.05), for 95% confidence level (Z α/2=1.96) and margin of error tolerated 5% (d=0.05). Because the source population is less than 10,000; sample size correction was made to estimate the final sample size and 10% of the sample size added for non-response rate that made the final sample size 126. All qualified diploma and degree nurses and midwives recruited by the government who provide delivery care services at the 6 health centres were included whereas those who did not provide delivery care services within the last six months prior to data collection to the time of data collection were exclude Data was collected by self-administered structured questionnaire that was adopted from published articles and further modification was based on the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of health new-born care training manual and the interest of the study. The questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% of the sample size at TZNA hospital, a private general hospital found in kolfe keranio sub city, Addis Ababa. Modification of tools was done prior to actual data collection based on the protest result. The questionnaire had both closed and open ended questions and participants completed all the necessary information by themselves.
Data collectors facilitated data collection process. They waited for each respondent to complete their questionnaire and immediately retrieved after completion. Data collectors were two diploma nurses and two diploma midwives. Supervisor was one medical doctor. Detail training was given for data collectors and supervisor. Daily, supervisor and principal investigator supervised and checked the completeness and quality of data. Incomplete and inconsistent questionnaires were excluded from analysis. Data was coded and entered to SPSS version 21 and analysed. Each correct alternative under each knowledge question was graded as 1 point and incorrect was graded as 0. Finally, it was dichotomized as good knowledge and poor knowledge based on the sum of correct responses by taking the median score as cut-off point. Bivariate analysis was done to determine candidates for multivariate analysis. Those variables which have significant association were further analysed by multivariate Logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of knowledge of ENC. Confidence interval of 95% was used to see the precision of the study and the statistical association was considered as significant if the p-value is less than 0.05. Ethical clearance and approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Addis Ababa University. Official letter was obtained from Lideta sub city health office to each health centres found in the sub-city. Verbal permission was obtained from each health centre medical directors. Finally, the data collectors gave detail explanation of the purpose and possible benefit of the study, clarified that participation is voluntary, as well as respect of the subject privacy was ensured, obtained written consent of participants and confidentiality of the data was maintained.
Socio-demographic characteristics
From the total 126 estimated sample, six questionnaires were excluded as a result of incompleteness, making the response rate 95.23%. The analysis was done based on the data collected from 120 participants. Accordingly the largest proportions of the respondents were between the ages of 24 and 30 years and smallest portion found between 40 and 50 years. The participants age ranges from 21 to 50 years with the mean of 29.8 (SD = ± 6.50) years. From the participants 51 (42.5%) were Diploma midwives and nurses. More than half of the study participants had less than six years’ experience of delivery care service. Of all the participants 85 (70.8%) were Females. The study revealed that, only 33 (27.5%) of respondents took training on new born care. Among the study participants 21 (17.5%) of them had no interest of working in the delivery room. 92 (76.7%) and 99 (82.5%) of the study subjects responded that all equipment, vaccines and drugs are available at their health facility respectively (Table 1).
Questions | Category | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 35 | 29.2 |
Female | 85 | 70.8 | |
Profession | Nursing | 69 | 57.5 |
Midwifery | 51 | 42.5 | |
Experience in Years | 0-5 Years | 59 | 49.2 |
6-10 Years | 41 | 34.1 | |
11-15 Years | 6 | 5 | |
>15 Years | 14 | 11.7 | |
Interest of working in Delivery room and maternity ward | Yes | 99 | 82.5 |
No | 21 | 17.5 | |
Availability of Equipments | Yes | 92 | 76.7 |
No | 28 | 23.3 | |
Availability of Drugs and Vaccines | Yes | 99 | 82.5 |
No | 21 | 17.5 | |
On Service Trainings | Yes | 33 | 27.5 |
No | 87 | 72.5 |
Knowledge of attending delivery
Regarding knowledge of health care providers about attending delivery 113 (94.2%) and 70 (58.3%) of them responded that it is important to make sure the area for delivery is clean, warm and well lighted and to have an assistant and should review the emergency plan respectively. From the participants 112 (93.3%) of them were found knowledgeable about hand washing and use of sterile gloves while attending delivery and the need to ensure the area for newborn resuscitation is prepared and necessary equipment’s (mucus extractor, ambu-bag, correct sized masks for ventilation and pediatric stethoscope) are clean and ready to use for every delivery and the importance of providing emotional support and reassurance for the mother as feasible. 78 (65.5%) of the participants responded that during the Golden minute it is important to help a baby breath if necessary (Table 2).
Variables | Responses | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Preparation for a Birth | Identify a helper and review emergency plan | 70 | 58.3 |
Preparing room for delivery | Make sure the area is clean, warm and well lighted | 113 | 94.2 |
Delivery Tasks | Tell the woman what is going to be done | 1 | 0.8 |
Make sure area for NR is prepared | 5 | 4.2 | |
Provide emotional support | 2 | 1.7 | |
All | 112 | 93.3 | |
What should be done during the Golden minute | Help a baby breath if necessary | 78 | 65 |
Knowledge of immediate new born care
Regarding knowledge of immediate new born care 70 (58.3%) of the participants were aware that only those newborns who cry and/or breath well can receive routine care and 104 (86.7) of them know that routine cares involve drying the baby, removing wet clothes and positioning the baby skin-to-skin with the mother. 112 (93.3%) of the participants were found to be aware that the baby should be immediately placed on the mother’s abdomen and dried quickly and thoroughly with a warm, dry cloth while simultaneously assessing the baby’s crying, color and breathing effort, the umbilicus should be clamped and cut 2-3 minutes later or after pulsations have ceased and apply tetracycline eye ointment to prevent eye infections and IM administration of Vitamin K to prevent bleeding. Regarding techniques of keeping the baby warm and clean 104 (86.7%) of the respondents were aware of placing the baby skin-to-skin with the mother and the need to wash hands before touching the baby and advise mother to wash her hands before breastfeeding. To prevent infection from dirty umbilical cord, only 22 (17.6%) of the study participants were aware of cleaning the cord with soap and water and dry with a sterile bandage and no need to cover. Regarding knowledge of health care providers on options of breastfeeding of the newborn 111 (92.5%) of the participants stated that breastfeeding should be started within one hour of delivery, 96 (80%) of participants stated that exclusive breastfeeding should continue for the next six months (Table 3).
Variables | Responses | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|---|
Immediate new born care | Place on mother’s abdomen, dry the baby, cover with warm, dry cloth | 1 | 0.8 |
Assess baby’s crying, color, breathing | 6 | 5.8 | |
Clamp and cut cord | 1 | 0.8 | |
All | 112 | 93.3 | |
Keeping the baby warm and clean | Place hot water bottles next to the baby’s skin | 2 | 1.7 |
Place the baby skin-to skin with the mother | 118 | 98.3 | |
Baby that can receive routine care | A baby who is not breathing | 29 | 24.2 |
A baby who is gasping | 19 | 15.8 | |
A baby who is crying/breathing well | 70 | 58.3 | |
A baby who is limp | 2 | 1.7 | |
Care for dirty umbilical cord | Clean with soap and water and cover with bandage | 10 | 8.3 |
Clean with soap and water and do not cover | 21 | 17.5 | |
Use alcohol to clean | 7 | 5.8 | |
Clean with sterile water and apply topical antibiotics | 81 | 67.5 | |
Initiation of BF | Within 1 hr of delivery | 111 | 92.5 |
1-6 hr after delivery | 3 | 2.5 | |
>6 hrs after delivery | 4 | 3.3 | |
After 24 hrs. | 2 | 1.7 | |
Duration of EBF | <6 months | 14 | 11.7 |
For 6 months | 96 | 80 | |
>6 months | 8 | 6.7 | |
12 months | 2 | 1.7 |
Knowledge of new-born resuscitation
According to the study 74 (61.7%) of the study participants were found to be knowledgeable on how to ventilate a newborn using bag and mask to produce gentle movement of the chest and 67 (55.8%) were aware of the need to reapply the mask to get a better seal if the chest is not moving on initiation of ventilation. Regarding the measures to be taken if the baby is not breathing with initial attempt of ventilation 64 (53.3%) of the respondents were aware how to improve the ventilation by repositioning the head, reapply the mask, clear secretions, open the mouth slightly and squeeze the bag harder and to continue ventilation and after wards if the HR is >100, baby is breathing spontaneously and if there is no chest in-drawing and/or grunting the baby can be put in skin-to-skin contact with the mother. 49 (40.8%) of the participants were aware that suctioning a baby unnecessarily might make the baby stop breathing by blocking the airway and 87 (72.5%) of them know that ventilation should be stopped when the baby’s heart rate is normal and the baby is breathing well or crying. 70 (58.3%) of the participants choose to keep the baby with the mother after successful ventilation and continue observation. Regarding the post-procedural activities 97 (80.8%) of the responded correctly to place disposable suction catheters and mucus extractors in a leak-proof container; place reusable catheters and mucus extractors in 0.5% chlorine solution for decontamination; clean and decontaminate the valve and mask; wash hands thoroughly; ensure the mother is aware of the resuscitation outcome and provide support and lastly to record pertinent information on the mother’s/newborn’s record (Table 4).
Overall knowledge of essential newborn care
The mean knowledge score of study participants was 12.66 (SD=±2.51) out of the total 20 points. The study revealed that 55% of the respondents had good knowledge of essential newborn care where as 45% had poor knowledge (Figure 1).
Factors associated with knowledge of essential newborn care
In order to identify factors associated with ENC knowledge, logistic regression was used with 95% CI and P-value <5%, all variables that have association by binary logistic regression were entered to multiple- logistic regression and final independent predictors of ENC were identified. Age, sex, level of education, experience in the facility, experience in delivery and maternity ward, interest of working in delivery or maternity ward, availability of equipment’s, availability of drugs and vaccines and in service training were not found to have significant association with participants’ level of knowledge of essential newborn care. Field of study was significantly associated with participants’ knowledge of essential newborn care (p <0.001). Midwives were 8 times more knowledgeable about essential newborn care than nurses [AOR (95%CI) 0.08 (0.03-0.22)] (Table 5) On both bivariate and multiple logistic analysis age, sex, work experience, experience in delivery and maternity ward, interest of working, availability of equipment’s, availability of drugs and vaccines and in service training were statistically insignificant with the knowledge of essential newborn care. Being a nurse or midwives was found to have significant association with their knowledge of essential newborn care (p <0.001). Midwives were 8 times more knowledgeable in essential newborn care compared to nurses [AOR (95%CI) 0.08 (0.03-0.23)].
Variables | Knowledge | COR (95% CI) | P-Value | AOR (95%CI) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Good | Poor | ||||
<30 | 53 (59.6%) | 36 (40.4%) | 0.6 (0.25-1.46) | 0.26 | 0.43 (0.14-1.26) | 0.098 |
>30 | 22 (71.0%) | 9 (29.0%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male | 24 (68.6%) | 11 (31.4%) | 0.68 (0.29-1.58) | 0.38 | 1.25 (0.45-3.47) | 0.66 |
Female | 51 (60.0%) | 34 (40.0%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Level of education | ||||||
Diploma | 28 (54.9%) | 23 (45.1%) | 1.75 (0.83-3.7) | 0.14 | 0.58 (0.24-1.4) | 0.23 |
Degree | 47 (68.1%) | 22 (31.9%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Interest of working in delivery ward | ||||||
Yes | 62 (62.6%) | 37 (37.4%) | 0.97 (0.37-2.56) | 0.95 | 1.3 (0.4-3.9) | 0.67 |
No | 13 (61.9%) | 8 (38.1%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Availability of equipment’s | ||||||
Yes | 56 (60.9%) | 36 (39.1%) | 1.35 (0.55-3.32) | 0.5 | 3.32 (1.0-10.9) | 0.05 |
No | 19 (67.9%) | 9 (32.1%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Availability of drugs and vaccines | ||||||
Yes | 63 (63.6%) | 36 (36.4%) | 0.76 (0.29-1.9) | 0.57 | 0.25 (0.6-0.9) | 0.037 |
No | 12 (57.1%) | 19(42.9%) | 1 | 1 | ||
In-service training | ||||||
Yes | 23 (69.7%) | 10 (45.5%) | 0.64 (0.27-1.52) | 0.32 | 0.73 (0.24-2.2) | 0.58 |
No | 52 (59.8%) | 35 (40.2%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Field of study | ||||||
Nursing | 31 (44.9%) | 38 (55.1%) | 7.7 (3.0-19.4) | <0.001 | 0.08 (0.26-0.23) | <0.001 |
Midwifery | 44 (86.3%) | 7 (13.7%) | 1 | 1 |
Reasons for health facility delivery
Various reasons were reported for health facility delivery by those who did. The three prominent reasons were: Need better service (56.62%), “I was told to deliver at health facilities” (22.06%), and bad outcome with previous home delivery (10.29%) (Table 4).
Knowledge is one of the crucial aspects of health systems to adherence of essential new-born care and lack of knowledge may impede provision of essential new-born care. In this study, the average knowledge score about ENC was 55%. This knowledge report is lower compared to report of study conducted in India, which was 78% for all providers. The discrepancy could be due to the difference in in-service training. The other possible reason might be difference of educational level of study participants. As in the case of this study, majority of participants were degree holders and majority of the participants had no in-service training on new-born care. This result is relatively higher compared to study conducted in Egypt, where 43.5% and 47.8% of nurses and midwives had good and poor knowledge of ENC respectively. The study also identified knowledge gaps on the steps of ENC. These gaps were mainly noted with the measures to take during the ‘golden minute’ and identification of neonates that can receive routine care where 35% and 41.7% of the participants were found not knowledgeable. Major knowledge gaps were also seen with the steps of cleaning a dirty umbilicus, consequences of unnecessary suctioning and steps to undertake if a baby fails to respond to initial steps of resuscitation, where 82.5%, 59.2% and 75.8% of the respondents were found to have less knowledge. The study has highlighted the importance of knowledge in empowering nurses and midwives to master their work in the way they prepare the delivery room for the birth and helping neonates’ breath at birth within ‘The Golden Minute’. Furthermore, the study shows the importance of the relationships between knowledge, level of education, and field of study. Participants with a qualification in midwifery were more likely to have higher knowledge scores. However, the results did not show a great impact of in service training. Training may be a factor that can be explored further.
Focus on training will need to be broadened to include attitudes, competencies and skills. Other studies prove in-service training as having a direct effect in reducing neonatal mortality rate. Midwives as part of the health care professionals play a critical role in knowledge generation and management which are vital in neonatal resuscitation and reduction of neonatal mortality. Therefore, different types of knowledge may invariably contribute in equipping midwives to address neonatal mortality. Factors like highest qualification in midwifery, continual training in neonatal resuscitation, professional position, as well as experience in practicing as a midwife help to level the playing fields in ensuring that midwives are knowledgeable in basic neonatal resuscitation. Thus, this is instrumental in improving their work performance. This implies therefore that the interplay of factors might have an effect on the knowledge score in support of the afore-mentioned statement.
Limitation of the study
The study focused on Knowledge, which is not the only component of competency that includes elements such as skills and attitudes which were not within the scope of this study The sample size used in this study was small compared to similar studies.
Even though the participants had good knowledge of ENC in general, they had poor knowledge on some components of ENC: The study population had knowledge gap with regard to measures to be taken during the ‘golden minute’ and identification of neonates that can receive routine care. The study population had knowledge gap on the precise cord clamping time and the care given to dirty umbilicus. The study population had knowledge gap on resuscitation domains including, consequences of unnecessary suctioning and steps to undertake if a baby fails to respond to initial steps of resuscitation, which leads to malpractice and increase the risk of asphyxia and its complications. The study population had good knowledge on initiation of breast feeding and duration of EBF. Majority of the study population had good knowledge on thermal protection which prevents hypothermia and its complications. Field of study was found to be independent predictor of knowledge of EN in the study area.
Information on the study was explained to the participants, including the procedures, potential risks, and benefits of the study. Informed voluntary oral consent was obtained from all respondents prior to the study because in our country especially in rural areas consent from guardian or parents were not experienced. In our country, Ethiopia communities in rural areas are not well familiar with different researches. The researcher who participated in the study was responsible for the privacy of the respondents. The authors confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable
Availability of data and materials: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
The Research was not funded by any organization and also the organization has no role in designing the study, data collection, or manuscript preparation.
All authors (NB and YB) contributed to the design of the study and the interpretation of data. YB performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All other authors (NB and YB) critically revised the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. YB is the guarantor of the paper.
First of all, I would like to thank my Almighty God for helping me conduct this research. Next and for most, I would like to thank my advisor; Dr. Alemayehu Bekele for his unreserved and repeated constructive and valuable comments starting from the development of the proposal throughout this research report. I would like to acknowledge the directors of all health centre for their support and cooperation in providing me data and necessary information about the study area. I would also like to thank the data collectors for their cooperation and genuine participation during data collection. Last but not least, I would to thank my wife Dr. Tinebeb Seyoum and my families for their unlimited love and support
Journal of Nursing & Care received 4230 citations as per Google Scholar report