Commentary - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 4
Received: 22-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. TM-22-62990;
Editor assigned: 24-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. P-62990;
Reviewed: 07-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-62990;
Revised: 15-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-62990;
Published:
21-Apr-2022
, DOI: 10.37421/2167-1222.2022.11.503
Citation: Carlino, Alberto. “Laparotomy for a Severe Trauma and Damage Control Surgery.” J Trauma Treat 11 (2022): 503.
Copyright: © 2022 Carlino A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For patients with significant abdominopelvic injuries, the Trauma laparotomy is commonly performed. It entails a sequence of meticulous steps that allow a surgeon to get interior access, detect, and treat these injuries. Each TL is different since the steps are prioritised based on the many injuries discovered, their severity, and the patient's general stability. Although there is no alternative for experiencing a real-life event, the theory presented here should serve as a beneficial supplement to your training [1]. There is no onesize- fits-all approach to a TL, and this article just serves as a reference to what we believe is best for sticking to the universally agreed basic concepts [2].
I walk you through a logical sequence of actions for effective preparation and equipment access, as well as the phases for securely entering and assessing the patient's belly. The TL is detailed in detail, including specific manoeuvres for detecting and treating injuries that may otherwise go unnoticed. The individual organs are described, along with the most prevalent patterns of injury and treatment. With the ever-increasing availability and successful application of interventional radiology, it's also necessary to examine alternatives to laparotomy as procedures advance. For the stable patient, laparoscopy is becoming increasingly popular, as it provides useful diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives. It can help with the consequences of a 'negative' TL, but it should only be utilised in certain people. For a trauma patient, one should be acutely conscious of its limitations and related risks, and be willing to convert to a laparotomy if necessary [3,4].
The decision to use TL should be made by a multidisciplinary team, which is especially critical in the case of polytrauma patients. This chapter concentrates on abdominal and pelvic trauma, but the other major compartments must also be considered. Indeed, various injuries that necessitate surgery beyond the abdomen, such as a combined thoracotomy or fracture stabilisation, necessitate careful coordination and consultation with other doctors. It's pointless to spend time healing intestinal damage while neglecting major lifethreatening injuries beyond the belly. Because surgery is also recommended for peritonitis, the abdomen presents unique complications in trauma. Every TL has a primary goal of achieving haemostasis. It's easy to lose concentration in an abdomen with several injuries and become distracted by other, less important ailments [5].
The secondary goals are to focus on rebuilding anatomy and decontaminating the abdomen. Temporary measures and approaches, rather than definitive surgery, may be used to achieve this. This chapter continues a running topic of the widely utilised idea of damage control surgery (DCS), which assumes that the patient will need at least one more procedure in the future. It aids recovery in the critical care unit by lowering primary operating time, preventing any irreparable physiological insult, and minimising primary operating time. It's also used when an organ's viability is in doubt and a planned relook laparotomy is required. The final surgical procedure may need to be done by a specialist in the field or at a different facility. Once a laparotomy is decided, the surgeon's actions follow a dynamic route dictated by the patient's ever-changing physiological status and the damage encountered. To deal with the obstacles met in theatre, the surgeon requires a three-dimensional set of skills, according to the book Top Knife [6].
The first is to use tried-and-true methods to do certain tasks, such as diagnosing and halting bleeding. The second is to evaluate the 'big picture' and control the operation's strategic component by examining targeted goals, ways to attain those goals, and possible alternatives. The third factor is the team, which necessitates strong leadership and effective communication.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest towards the manuscript.
Not Applicable.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Journal of Trauma & Treatment received 1048 citations as per Google Scholar report
