Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Neutrality in Steel Structures

Elsaid Niaounakis^*
*Correspondence: Elsaid Niaounakis, Department of Building Technology, Linnaeus University, Vaxjo, Sweden, Email:

Keywords

Life cycle assessment • Carbon neutrality • Steel structures • Embodied carbon emissions • Sustainable construction • Environmental footprint • Recycled steel structural • Design renewable • Energy stakeholder collaboration

Introduction

In recent years, the global construction industry has faced increasing pressure to address its significant contribution to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Among the materials commonly used in construction, steel stands out due to its substantial energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions. As the demand for sustainable practices grows, the concept of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has emerged as a valuable tool for evaluating and minimizing the environmental impacts of construction materials and processes. This article delves into the realm of LCA and its pivotal role in achieving carbon neutrality in steel structures, shedding light on the strategies that can lead to a more sustainable built environment.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a systematic approach that assesses the environmental impact of a product, process, or system throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to final disposal. LCA takes into account various stages, including raw material acquisition, production, transportation, use, maintenance and end-of-life scenarios. By quantifying energy consumption, resource depletion, emissions and other environmental indicators, LCA provides a comprehensive understanding of a product's or system's sustainability performance. Steel, a widely used construction material, has a significant carbon footprint primarily due to its energy-intensive production process. Carbon neutrality, a crucial goal in sustainable construction, is achieved when the carbon emissions associated with a material or process are offset by an equivalent amount of carbon sequestration or removal. For steel structures, this involves not only reducing carbon emissions during production but also addressing emissions from transportation, fabrication, construction, maintenance and eventual dismantling [1].

Literature Review

Utilizing recycled steel can significantly reduce the carbon emissions associated with steel production. Recycled steel requires less energy and produces fewer emissions compared to virgin steel production. Implementing efficient and optimized structural designs can lead to a reduction in the amount of steel used, thereby lowering the embodied carbon emissions of the structure. Shifting to renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, in steel production can mitigate the emissions generated from energy-intensive processes. Integrating carbon capture and storage technologies in steel production can capture a substantial portion of emissions before they are released into the atmosphere. Evaluating the complete life cycle of steel structures, including maintenance and end-of-life scenarios, can guide decisions that minimize environmental impact over the entire lifespan. Achieving carbon neutrality in steel structures requires collaborative efforts among stakeholders, including architects, engineers, manufacturers, policymakers and construction professionals. These stakeholders need to work together to implement sustainable practices, share knowledge and drive innovation in the construction industry. Governments and regulatory bodies can play a vital role by incentivizing sustainable construction practices and enforcing stricter environmental standards [2,3].

In the pursuit of carbon neutrality and a more sustainable built environment, Life Cycle Assessment emerges as a critical methodology for evaluating the environmental impact of steel structures. By assessing the entire life cycle of steel, from production to disposal and implementing strategies like recycled steel use, optimized design and renewable energy adoption, the construction industry can make significant strides toward achieving carbon neutrality. Through collaboration among stakeholders and informed policy decisions, the path to a more environmentally responsible future for steel structures can be paved, ensuring a lasting positive impact on the planet. While the concept of achieving carbon neutrality in steel structures through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and sustainable practices is promising, several challenges and considerations need to be addressed [4].

Accurate data collection and assessment throughout a product's life cycle can be challenging. Obtaining reliable data on energy consumption, emissions and other environmental factors at each stage of a steel structure's life cycle is crucial for meaningful LCA results. Striking a balance between various environmental impacts can be complex. For instance, while using recycled steel reduces the carbon footprint, it may introduce other environmental trade-offs, such as increased energy consumption in the recycling process. Implementing carbonneutral practices and LCA on a large scale requires significant investments, both in terms of financial resources and technological advancements. Scaling up sustainable practices while maintaining cost-effectiveness is a crucial challenge.

Discussion

Continued research and development are necessary to advance technologies like carbon capture and storage, renewable energy integration and material efficiency in steel production and construction. Robust policy frameworks, incentives and regulations are essential to encourage adoption of sustainable practices in the construction industry. Governments and regulatory bodies must play an active role in promoting carbon neutrality. Raising awareness and educating stakeholders about the benefits of LCA, carbon neutrality and sustainable construction practices is vital for driving widespread adoption. Collaboration among various disciplines, including engineering, architecture, economics and environmental science, is crucial to develop holistic solutions that consider both technical and economic aspects.

Research into new, low-carbon steel production methods and alternative materials with lower environmental impacts will drive innovation in the construction industry. The integration of digital tools and data analytics will enhance the accuracy and efficiency of LCA, making it easier to track and manage the environmental performance of steel structures. Embracing a circular economy approach will promote the reuse and recycling of construction materials, reducing the need for virgin resources and minimizing waste. Green building certification systems like LEED and BREEAM will continue to encourage sustainable practices by recognizing and rewarding projects that achieve carbon neutrality and LCA goals. International collaboration and knowledge sharing will accelerate the adoption of best practices and drive innovation in achieving carbon neutrality across borders [5,6].

Conclusion

The quest for achieving carbon neutrality in steel structures through Life Cycle Assessment represents a vital step toward creating a sustainable and environmentally responsible construction industry. By evaluating the complete life cycle of steel structures and implementing strategies that minimize embodied carbon emissions, stakeholders can contribute to a greener built environment. As technology advances and awareness grows, the collaborative efforts of designers, manufacturers, policymakers and researchers will play a pivotal role in transforming the construction industry and realizing the vision of carbonneutral steel structures. Through continuous innovation, policy support and interdisciplinary cooperation, the construction sector can emerge as a beacon of sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Wang, Shengwei, Shuize Wang, Hong-Hui Wu and Yuan Wu, et al. "Towards enhanced strength-ductility synergy via hierarchical design in steels: From the material genome perspective." Sci Bull 66 (2021): 958-961.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Sun, Xiaorong, Xueping Pan, Chenhao Jin and Yihan Li, et al. "Life cycle assessment-based carbon footprint accounting model and analysis for integrated energy stations in China." Int J Environ 19 (2022): 16451.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Jaouani, Atef, Maxime Vanthournhout and M. J. Penninckx. "Olive oil mill wastewater purification by combination of coagulation-flocculation and biological treatments." Environ Technol 26 (2005): 633-642.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Michael, I., A. Panagi, L. A. Ioannou and Z. Frontistis, et al. "Utilizing solar energy for the purification of olive mill wastewater using a pilot-scale photocatalytic reactor after coagulation-flocculation." Water Res 60 (2014): 28-40.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Jung, Chanil, Narong Phal, Jeill Oh and Kyoung Hoon Chu, et al. "Removal of humic and tannic acids by adsorptionâ??coagulation combined systems with activated biochar." J Hazard Mater 300 (2015): 808-814.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Majdi, Hasan Sh, Ali Abdulhussein Shubbar, Mohammed Salah Nasr and Zainab S. Al-Khafaji, et al. "Experimental data on compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity properties of sustainable mortar made with high content of GGBFS and CKD combinations." Data Br 31 (2020).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at