GET THE APP

Low Screening and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Patients with Cirrhosis
..

Hepatology and Pancreatic Science

ISSN: 2573-4563

Open Access

Perspective - (2024) Volume 8, Issue 2

Low Screening and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Patients with Cirrhosis

Anna Olczyk*
*Correspondence: Anna Olczyk, Department of Pathology, University of Politécnico, 46026 Valencia, Spain, Email:
Department of Pathology, University of Politécnico, 46026 Valencia, Spain

Received: 02-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. hps-24-136902; Editor assigned: 04-Mar-2024, Pre QC No. P-136902; Reviewed: 18-Mar-2024, QC No. Q-136902; Revised: 23-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. R-136902; Published: 30-Mar-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2573-4563.2024.8.272
Citation: Olczyk, Anna. “Low Screening and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Patients with Cirrhosis.” J Hepato Pancreat Sci 8 (2024): 272.
Copyright: © 2024 Olczyk A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a significant yet often overlooked complication in patients with cirrhosis. Despite the higher prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in this population compared to the general public, the rates of screening and treatment remain alarmingly low. This deficiency in care is critical as osteoporosis can lead to severe fractures, which significantly impact the quality of life and overall clinical outcomes for these patients. Patients with cirrhosis have an increased risk of developing osteoporosis due to multiple factors, including malnutrition, vitamin D deficiency, and the chronic inflammation associated with liver disease. Studies indicate that the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis ranges from 12% to 55%, significantly higher than in the general population. Furthermore, up to 40% of these patients may experience fractures [1]. The treatment rates for osteoporosis in cirrhotic patients are also disappointingly low. Of those diagnosed with osteoporosis, only 22.6% received treatment, primarily with oral bisphosphonates. This low treatment rate persists despite the availability of effective therapies that can reduce the risk of fractures.

Current guidelines from various liver disease and osteoporosis societies acknowledge the increased risk of bone disease in patients with chronic liver diseases, including cirrhosis. However, specific recommendations for routine screening and comprehensive management strategies are limited. For instance, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) includes guidelines for nutritional support and bone disease management in chronic liver disease, but more detailed, specific guidelines for osteoporosis in cirrhosis are needed. Regular endocrinology consultations could help in the timely identification and treatment of osteoporosis. Educating patients about the risks of osteoporosis and the importance of screening and treatment can empower them to seek necessary care [2].

Improving the screening and treatment rates for osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis is crucial for preventing fractures and enhancing the overall quality of life for these patients. Several barriers contribute to the low rates of screening and treatment for osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis. Many healthcare providers may not be fully aware of the heightened risk of osteoporosis in cirrhotic patients, leading to a lack of proactive screening and management. In managing cirrhosis, healthcare providers often prioritize addressing life-threatening complications such as variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. This can lead to bone health being overlooked. Patients with cirrhosis often have multiple comorbidities and may face socioeconomic barriers that limit access to healthcare resources, including diagnostic tests like DEXA scans and subsequent treatments [3].

Description

Increased education and awareness campaigns targeting hepatologists, gastroenterologists, and primary care physicians can help integrate osteoporosis screening into routine care for patients with cirrhosis. Continuing medical education programs and updated clinical pathways can reinforce the importance of bone health in these patients. Educating patients about the risks of osteoporosis and the benefits of early screening and treatment can empower them to seek care proactively. Educational materials and counseling sessions should be part of the routine management of cirrhosis. Implementing a multidisciplinary approach where hepatologists collaborate with endocrinologists, dietitians, and physical therapists can ensure comprehensive care for patients. Regular consultations with endocrinologists can help manage bone health proactively [4].

Improving access to diagnostic tools and treatments is essential. This could involve policy changes to ensure coverage of DEXA scans and osteoporosis medications under insurance plans, as well as the provision of these services in community health centers. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis and to develop targeted interventions. Prospective studies and clinical trials focusing on the efficacy of different osteoporosis treatments in this population could provide valuable data. Additionally, exploring the role of novel biomarkers in early detection and monitoring of bone disease could enhance screening protocols [5].

Conclusion

Osteoporosis in patients with cirrhosis is a critical yet under-addressed issue that requires urgent attention. By improving screening rates, establishing comprehensive guidelines, enhancing healthcare provider and patient education, and ensuring access to necessary diagnostic and treatment services, the healthcare community can significantly improve the management of osteoporosis in cirrhotic patients. Effective management of osteoporosis in cirrhotic patients is not only feasible but also essential for improving long-term outcomes and reducing the burden of fractures and their associated complications. Collaborative efforts among healthcare providers, professional societies, and policymakers will be key to achieving these goals.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Oh, J. H., B. W. Song, S. H. Kim and J-A. Choi, et al. "The measurement of bone mineral density of bilateral proximal humeri using DXA in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear.Osteoporos Int 25 (2014): 2639-2648.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Krappinger, Dietmar, Tobias Roth, Martin Gschwentner and Armin Suckert, et al. "Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.Skelet Radiol 41 (2012): 299-304.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Barvencik, Florian, Matthias Gebauer, Frank Timo Beil and Eik Vettorazzi, et al. "Age‐and sex‐related changes of humeral head microarchitecture: Histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens." Journal of Orthop Res 28 (2010): 18-26.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Tingart, Markus J., Maria Apreleva, Dietrich von Stechow and David Zurakowski, et al. "The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus." J Bone Jt Surg Br 85 (2003): 611-617.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Court-Brown, Charles M., Ashima Garg and Margaret M. McQueen. "The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures." Acta Orthop Scand 72 (2001): 365-371.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward