GET THE APP

Managing Colorectal Cancer from Etiology to Interdisciplinary Treatment: The Gains and Challenges of Modern Medicine
..

Archives of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 2471-2671

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 10, Issue 1

Managing Colorectal Cancer from Etiology to Interdisciplinary Treatment: The Gains and Challenges of Modern Medicine

Jyotsna Lam*
*Correspondence: Jyotsna Lam, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University of Orleans, Orleans, France, Email:
Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University of Orleans, Orleans, France

Received: 23-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. aso-24-132873; Editor assigned: 25-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. P-132873; Reviewed: 08-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-132873; Revised: 13-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-132873; Published: 20-Feb-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2471-2671.2024.10.94
Citation: Lam, Jyotsna. “Managing Colorectal Cancer from Etiology to Interdisciplinary Treatment: The Gains and Challenges of Modern Medicine.” Arch Surg Oncol 10 (2024): 94.
Copyright: © 2024 Lam J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.<

Introduction

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies globally, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Despite advancements in early detection and treatment modalities, managing CRC poses complex challenges. This article delves into the etiology of CRC, explores the evolution of interdisciplinary treatment approaches, and discusses the gains and challenges encountered in modern medicine. Colorectal cancer arises from the malignant transformation of cells lining the colon or rectum. Several etiological factors contribute to its development, including genetic predisposition, environmental influences, and lifestyle choices. Individuals with a family history of CRC, particularly those with Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), face an elevated risk. Additionally, hereditary syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and FAP account for a small but significant proportion of CRC cases [1].

Description

Environmental factors such as diet, obesity, smoking, and lack of physical activity also play crucial roles in CRC development. High consumption of red and processed meats, low intake of dietary fiber, and sedentary lifestyles have been associated with increased CRC risk. Furthermore, chronic inflammation, as seen in conditions like Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), predisposes individuals to CRC. The management of CRC has evolved significantly over the years, transitioning from traditional surgical interventions to multimodal treatment strategies. Early-stage CRC is often curable through surgical resection, with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy employed as necessary. However, advanced or metastatic CRC poses greater therapeutic challenges, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach.

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized CRC. Advances in surgical techniques, including minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery, have led to improved outcomes and reduced morbidity. Chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with targeted agents, plays a crucial role in the management of advanced CRC. Drugs targeting specific molecular pathways, such as anti-EGFR and anti- VEGF agents, have demonstrated efficacy in selected patient populations, improving overall survival and quality of life [2].

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment landscape for metastatic CRC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, have shown promising results in patients with Microsatellite Instability-high (MSI-H) or Mismatch Repairdeficient (dMMR) tumors, leading to durable responses and prolonged survival. Advances in genomic profiling have paved the way for precision medicine approaches in CRC. Molecular characterization of tumors allows for personalized treatment strategies, enabling the selection of targeted therapies based on individual tumor biology and genetic alterations [3].

The integration of modern medical interventions has undoubtedly improved outcomes for patients with CRC. However, several challenges persist, hindering optimal management and necessitating ongoing research and innovation. While screening programs have proven effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality, disparities in access and adherence remain significant challenges. Efforts to enhance screening uptake, particularly among underserved populations, are imperative to ensure timely detection and intervention. Despite the efficacy of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, drug resistance remains a formidable obstacle in the management of advanced CRC. Tumor heterogeneity and adaptive resistance mechanisms contribute to treatment failure, emphasizing the need for novel therapeutic strategies and combination approaches [4].

Chemotherapy and targeted agents are associated with a range of toxicities and side effects, impacting patient quality of life and treatment adherence. The cost of novel anticancer therapies, including targeted agents and immunotherapy, poses significant financial burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Ensuring equitable access to innovative treatments while addressing cost-effectiveness concerns is essential to mitigate disparities in cancer care [5].

Conclusion

Colorectal cancer represents a complex and multifaceted disease, necessitating a comprehensive approach encompassing prevention, early detection, and interdisciplinary treatment modalities. While significant strides have been made in CRC management, challenges such as drug resistance, treatment toxicity, and access disparities persist. Continued research efforts aimed at unraveling the molecular underpinnings of CRC and developing innovative therapeutic strategies are crucial to further improve outcomes and mitigate the burden of this malignancy on a global scale.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Al Omran, Yasser, Ali Abdall-Razak, Nader Ghassemi and Samar Alomran, et al. "Robotics in cleft surgery: Origins, current status and future directions."Robot Surg Res Rev (2019): 41-46.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Babbar, Paurush, Nitin Yerram, Andrew Sun and Sij Hemal, et al. "Robot-assisted ureteral reconstructionâ??current status and future directions."Urol Ann 10 (2018): 7.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Hernigou, Philippe, Sébastien Lustig and Jacques Caton. "Artificial intelligence and robots like us (surgeons) for people like you (patients): Toward a new humanâ??robot-surgery shared experience. What is the moral and legal status of robots and surgeons in the operating room?." Int Orthop (2023): 1-6.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Dahmen, Jari, M. Kayaalp, Matthieu Ollivier and Ayoosh Pareek, et al. "Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: The potential game changer as a double-edged sword."Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2023): 1-3.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Bianco, Amanda, Zaid AM Al-Azzawi, Elena Guadagno and Esli Osmanlliu, et al. "Use of machine learning in pediatric surgical clinical prediction tools: A Systematic Review."J Pediatr Surg (2023).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward