GET THE APP

Medication-drug Interactions in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients
..

Journal of Clinical Respiratory Diseases & Care: Open Access

ISSN: 2472-1247

Open Access

Mini Review - (2024) Volume 10, Issue 1

Medication-drug Interactions in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients

Aroleesr Swewros*
*Correspondence: Aroleesr Swewros, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel, Email:
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel

Received: 01-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. jcrdc-24-129351; Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2024, Pre QC No. P-129351; Reviewed: 17-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-129351; Revised: 22-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-129351; Published: 29-Feb-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2472-1247.2024.10.285
Citation: Swewros, Aroleesr. “Medication-drug Interactions in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients.” J Clin Respir Dis Care 10 (2024): 285.
Copyright: © 2024 Swewros A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition characterized by widespread inflammation in the lungs, leading to respiratory failure. Management of ARDS often involves a combination of medications to address various aspects of the condition, including inflammation, fluid balance and oxygenation. However, the complexity of medication regimens in ARDS patients can increase the risk of drug interactions, which may impact treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of medication-drug interactions in ARDS patients, focusing on commonly used medications and their potential interactions.

Keywords

Acute respiratory distress syndrome • Medication-drug interactions • Pharmacotherapy • Critical care • Intensive care unit

Introduction

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by severe inflammation in the lungs, leading to impaired gas exchange and respiratory failure. Management of ARDS typically involves supportive care, mechanical ventilation and pharmacological interventions aimed at addressing underlying inflammation, fluid imbalance and oxygenation issues. However, the use of multiple medications in ARDS patients can increase the likelihood of drug interactions, which may affect treatment efficacy and patient safety. Understanding the pathophysiology of ARDS is crucial for identifying potential drug interactions. ARDS is often initiated by an inciting event such as pneumonia, sepsis, or trauma, leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This inflammatory cascade results in increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier, pulmonary edema and impaired gas exchange. Pharmacological interventions in ARDS aim to modulate inflammation, improve oxygenation and prevent further lung injury [1].

Literature Review

Corticosteroids are frequently used in ARDS to reduce inflammation and mitigate lung injury. However, prolonged use of corticosteroids can increase the risk of complications such as infections and gastrointestinal bleeding. Sedatives and analgesics are essential for managing pain and agitation in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients. Common medications include benzodiazepines, propofol and opioids. However, these drugs can cause respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability, particularly when used in combination. Vasopressors such as norepinephrine are often required to maintain adequate blood pressure in septic ARDS patients. However, the concurrent use of vasopressors with other medications, such as corticosteroids, can exacerbate hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular complications. Antibiotics are commonly administered in ARDS patients to treat underlying infections, such as pneumonia or sepsis. However, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics can disrupt the normal gut microbiota and increase the risk of secondary infections, such as Clostridium difficile colitis [2].

Discussion

Concurrent use of corticosteroids and NSAIDs can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding due to their additive effects on gastric mucosal integrity. Combining sedatives with NMBAs can potentiate respiratory depression and increase the risk of prolonged neuromuscular blockade, leading to difficulty weaning patients off mechanical ventilation. Concurrent use of vasopressors and inotropic agents can result in severe hypertension and arrhythmias, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease [3]. Some antibiotics, such as azithromycin and erythromycin, can prolong the QT interval and increase the risk of torsades de pointes when used concurrently with certain antifungal agents, such as fluconazole. Healthcare providers caring for ARDS patients must be vigilant for potential medicationdrug interactions and take proactive measures to minimize their impact [4]. This includes thorough medication reconciliation, close monitoring of vital signs and laboratory parameters and regular reassessment of the patient's clinical status [5]. Pharmacists play a crucial role in identifying and preventing medication-drug interactions through medication review and consultation with the healthcare team [6].

Conclusion

Medication-drug interactions are common in ARDS patients due to the complexity of their medication regimens and the underlying pathophysiology of the condition. Healthcare providers must remain vigilant for potential interactions and take proactive measures to minimize their impact on treatment efficacy and patient safety. Collaboration among interdisciplinary team members, including physicians, pharmacists and nurses, is essential for optimizing medication therapy and improving outcomes in ARDS patients. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of medication-drug interactions in ARDS and develop strategies to mitigate their risks effectively.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Magnini, Daniele, Giuliano Montemurro, Bruno Iovene and Linda Tagliaboschi, et al. "Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Molecular endotypes of fibrosis stratifying existing and emerging therapies."Respir 93 (2017): 379-395.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Du Bois, R. M. "Strategies for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis."Nat Rev Drug Discov 9 (2010): 129-140.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Hunninghake, Gary W and Anthony R. Kalica. "Approaches to the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis."Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151 (1995): 915-918.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Prokhorov, Alexander V., Tracey Yost, Mary Mullin-Jones and Carl de Moor, et al. "“Look at your health”: Outcomes associated with a computer-assisted smoking cessation counseling intervention for community college students."Addict Behav 33 (2008): 757-771.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Maher, Toby M and Mary E. Strek. "Antifibrotic therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Time to treat."Respir Res 20 (2019): 1-9.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  6. Thannickal, Victor J., Galen B. Toews, Eric S. White and Joseph P. Lynch Iii, et al. "Mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis."Annu Rev Me55 (2004): 395-417.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 86

Journal of Clinical Respiratory Diseases & Care: Open Access received 86 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Clinical Respiratory Diseases & Care: Open Access peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward