GET THE APP

Medicinal Chemistry and its Clinical Progress
..

Medicinal Chemistry

ISSN: 2161-0444

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 8

Medicinal Chemistry and its Clinical Progress

Hussain Alamdar*
*Correspondence: Hussain Alamdar, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA, Email:
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA

Received: 02-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. mccr-22-79887; Editor assigned: 04-Aug-2022, Pre QC No. P-79887; Reviewed: 16-Aug-2022, QC No. Q-79887; Revised: 22-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. R-79887; Published: 27-Aug-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0444.2022.12.637
Citation: Alamdar, Hussain. “ Medicinal Chemistry and its Clinical Progress." J Med Chem 12 (2022): 637.
Copyright: © 2022 Alamdar H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

In the past 25 years, there have been significant changes to the function of the medicinal chemist in drug discovery, mostly as a result of the development of technologies like combinatorial chemistry and structure-based drug design. We explore this evolving position using examples from our own and others' experience as medicinal chemists who have more than 50 years of combined expertise spanning the previous four decades. By assisting the medicinal chemist in reclaiming the creative role that led to earlier achievements, this historical viewpoint may offer insights on how to enhance the current model for drug discovery [1].

Description

Propranolol, timolol, metoprolol, and betaxolol's physicochemical characteristics can be examined to confirm their high lipophilicity. The ratio of carbon atoms to heteroatoms (mostly those with hydrogen attached, such as NHs and OHs) can be used to determine the lipophilicity of a substance. Primary medical chemistry literature explains empirical lipophilicity prediction. 2 Polar groups, in particular NH and OH groups, boost hydrophilicity. The molecule is more lipophilic the more carbons there are in the complex.

That earlier and relatively straightforward landscape has transformed as a result of the emergence of new technologies including high-throughput in vitro screening, huge chemical libraries, combinatorial technology, specified molecular targets, and structure-based drug design. Although the medicinal chemist has access to a wide range of new options thanks to these new technologies, transferring in vitro activity into in vivo activity has been more difficult than expected due to the proliferation of additional safety standards. The knowledge base supporting drug research has grown significantly concurrently, making it more difficult for chemists to comprehend their areas of specialisation. Additionally, it has grown increasingly difficult to demonstrate appropriate clinical safety and efficacy in people, and regulatory bodies now want a growing volume of data [2,3], Finding a medical need and evaluating the sufficiency of available treatments are the first steps in the drug discovery process (if there are any). Hypotheses on how to potentially improve therapy— specifically, what advances in efficacy, safety, or mechanistically unique2 medication treatment will benefit patients with the target disease—will emerge from this analysis along with an assessment of the present understanding of the target disease. Specific project goals will be established based on these hypotheses. Following that, testing of certain compounds in pertinent biological tests might start.

A variety of abilities are needed for the medicinal chemist to meet all the issues mentioned above. A strong awareness of medicinal and current organic chemistry, knowledge of the biology related to the target ailment, familiarity with the pharmacological tests employed in the project, and enough knowledge of the variables affecting ADME properties of drugs in vivo are among these. Additionally, they should be knowledgeable about the clinical medicine that is pertinent to the target disease, the regulatory requirements for associated drugs, competitive therapies that are currently on the market and those that are being developed by rivals, a thorough knowledge of the literature that is pertinent to the target disease, and familiarity with the numerous more modern technologies that are available to facilitate drug discovery.

A 58-year-old Caucasian male with presyncope and diaphoresis arrived at a community hospital emergency room with abrupt onset retrosternal chest discomfort. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were present in the past but no drugs were used. He occasionally smoked and drank 12 to 14 beers per week. He was identified as having an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on the results of his ECG and troponin level. He received daily doses of aspirin, atorvastatin, and ramipril after receiving tenecteplase reperfusion therapy. He was also referred to a cardiology centre for an urgent heart catheterization. When ST-elevation myocardial infarction occurred, the peak level of creatine kinase (CK) was 442 U/L.

The statin molecule should be more hydrophilic to produce liver-directed effects. White demonstrated the relationship between the propensity to develop myopathies and logD7.4, which is the distribution coefficient of n-octanol/ water in pH 7.4. More lipophilic statins (such as atorvastatin, simvastatin, and cerivastatin) are frequently associated with myopathies cases because of their higher extra-hepatic concentrations, whereas more hydrophilic statins (such as rosuvastatin and pravastatin) are more likely taken up by the liver organic anion transport polypeptide (OATP) and are less distributed to the extrahepatic tissues.

Projects typically employed in vivo models for initial screening because the precise biological pathways underlying the majority of diseases were not well understood. The discovery of the antipsychotic ziprasidone, made in vitro receptor-based pharmacology uncommon until the 1980s and 1990s. Typically, it was not possible to test a drug against a key enzyme or a specific receptor involved in the disease process in vitro. Additionally, there were just a few chemical collections available for preliminary biological screening. By hand, charts and graphs were created using the test model data that had been collected, examined, and presented. Similar to this, looking through bound books that had been taken out individually from the library shelves in order to find pertinent material required handling [4,5].

Conclusion

The utilisation of molecularly defined biological targets, such as enzymes, receptors, and transporters, has become a crucial component of the drug discovery model used today thanks to the molecular genetics revolution3 that it sparked. Contrary to the therapeutically based animal-model method utilised in the early era of drug development outlined above, the quest for identified molecular targets for drug discovery is driven by a number of causes. One is the benefit of a "black-box" (i.e., unknown) mechanism derived from animal-model testing that could result in unanticipated toxicity during drug development over a known mechanism. Another is structure-based drug creation, which enables chemists to create novel compounds by directly viewing how a lead molecule interacts with the target protein through X-ray crystallographic analysis, but which also has some drawbacks.

The patient claimed that while she was feeling OK prior to getting the intravenous premedications, she was unable to sit down after receiving diphenhydramine and felt better when she stood up and moved around. Throughout the three hours of the chemotherapy infusion, she moved around the room and in the hallway. The patient said that the agitation subsided at the end of the chemotherapy session and denied experiencing any tremors or hallucinations. She went to bed when she got home and woke up without any lingering agitation.

References

  1. Adams, Margaret J., Manfred Buehner, K. Chandrasekhar and Geoffrey C. Ford, et al. "Structure-function relationships in lactate dehydrogenase." Proc Natl Acad Sci 70 (1973): 1968-1972.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Huijgen, Henk J., Gerard TB Sanders, Rudolph W. Koster and Johan Vreeken, et al. "The clinical value of lactate dehydrogenase in serum: A quantitative review." Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 35 (1997): 569-580.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Allen, M. J. "Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in animals: Uses and limitations." Vet Clin Pathol 32 (2003): 101-113.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Hatayama, Kazuhisa, Yoshito Nishihara, Sayaka Kimura and Ken Goto, et al. "Alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes in mouse plasma detected by polyacrylamide-gel disk electrophoresis." J Toxicol Sci 36 (2011): 211-219.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Hata, Akihisa, Noboru Fujitani, Masahiro Takeshita, Chie Tanaka and Noriko Matsuda, et al. "Comparison of regression for blood ALP levels using methods of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in bovine, canine, feline, and human testing." PLoS One 16 (2021): e0253396.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 6627

Medicinal Chemistry received 6627 citations as per Google Scholar report

Medicinal Chemistry peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward