Microalgal Bioprocesses: Cultivating Sustainability from Biofuels to Circular Economies

Beyza Karacaoglu^*
*Correspondence: Beyza Karacaoglu, Department of Bioengineering, University of Davutpasa, Davutpasa, Turkey, Email:

Keywords

Microalgal bioprocesses • Nutraceuticals • Biofuel production

Introduction

The term "microalgal bioprocess" encompasses a wide array of techniques and methodologies aimed at harnessing the unique properties of microalgae for the benefit of diverse applications. These applications include biofuel production, wastewater treatment, nutraceuticals and even carbon capture. One of the most promising applications of microalgal bioprocesses is in the production of biofuels. Microalgae are rich in lipids, which can be converted into biodiesel through a process known as transesterification. Unlike traditional biofuel crops, microalgae can be cultivated in non-arable land, minimizing competition with food crops and avoiding deforestation. Microalgae play a crucial role in wastewater treatment by serving as a natural biofilter. They can absorb and assimilate nutrients, heavy metals and other pollutants from industrial and municipal wastewater [1].

Literature Review

This not only helps in the purification of water but also provides a sustainable and cost-effective approach to wastewater treatment. Microalgae are rich sources of bioactive compounds, including omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants and pigments. These compounds have applications in the production of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. For example, Spirulina and Chlorella are microalgae commonly used as dietary supplements due to their high nutritional content. Photosynthetic microalgae capture carbon dioxide during their growth through photosynthesis. This feature makes them valuable in carbon capture and utilization strategies. By integrating microalgae cultivation with industrial processes, it is possible to mitigate carbon emissions and produce valuable biomass simultaneously.

Discussion

The success of microalgal bioprocesses depends significantly on the cultivation methods employed. Various techniques are utilized to optimize the growth of microalgae and enhance the yield of desired products. Open pond systems are the simplest and most cost-effective method for microalgal cultivation. Large open ponds are exposed to sunlight, allowing microalgae to grow through photosynthesis. However, this method has challenges such as contamination and variability in environmental conditions. Closed photobioreactors provide a controlled environment for microalgal cultivation. These closed systems offer better control over temperature, light intensity and nutrient supply, reducing the risk of contamination. Although more expensive to set up, photobioreactors can result in higher biomass and product yields [2].

Raceway ponds are semi-closed systems with a circular design that promotes the circulation of microalgal culture. They strike a balance between the simplicity of open pond systems and the control offered by photobioreactors. Raceway ponds are suitable for large-scale microalgal cultivation. Mixotrophic cultivation involves supplying microalgae with both organic carbon sources and light. This method allows for faster growth and higher biomass production compared to autotrophic cultivation (relying solely on photosynthesis). It is particularly useful in environments with fluctuating light conditions. In heterotrophic cultivation, microalgae are grown in the absence of light and organic carbon sources are provided as an energy and carbon substrate. This method is advantageous in environments where sunlight is limited, such as indoor bioreactor systems [3].

Despite the numerous advantages of microalgal bioprocesses, several challenges hinder their widespread commercialization. The initial setup costs for microalgal cultivation systems, especially closed photobioreactors, can be high. Achieving economic viability in the production of biofuels and other high-value products remains a significant challenge. Open pond systems are susceptible to contamination by competing microorganisms. Maintaining a sterile environment is crucial to avoid the loss of microalgal culture and the introduction of unwanted species. Harvesting microalgae from culture systems and dewatering the biomass are energy-intensive processes. Developing efficient and cost-effective methods for harvesting and dewatering is essential for the economic feasibility of microalgal bioprocesses [4].

Identifying and optimizing strains with desirable traits for specific applications is a complex task. Genetic engineering approaches are being explored to enhance the productivity of microalgae and tailor them for specific industrial purposes. Advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology are opening new possibilities for enhancing the characteristics of microalgae. Researchers are exploring ways to modify microalgal strains to improve their growth rates, lipid content and resistance to environmental stress. Integrating microalgal bioprocesses with other industries, such as agriculture and aquaculture, can create synergies and enhance overall sustainability. For example, microalgae cultivation can be combined with fish farming to create a closed-loop system where the waste from one process serves as nutrients for the other. Microalgal bioprocesses align well with the principles of a circular economy. By utilizing waste streams from other industries as nutrient sources for microalgae, it is possible to create a more sustainable and interconnected industrial ecosystem. Innovations in downstream processing, including harvesting and extraction techniques, are crucial for reducing the overall costs of microalgal bioprocesses. Continuous efforts are being made to develop efficient and scalable methods for harvesting and extracting valuable compounds from microalgae [5,6].

Conclusion

Microalgal bioprocesses represent a versatile and sustainable approach to address various challenges facing society, from energy production to environmental remediation. The on-going research and development in this field continue to uncover new opportunities and overcome existing challenges. As technology advances and economies of scale are achieved, microalgal bioprocesses have the potential to play a pivotal role in the transition towards a more sustainable and environmentally conscious future. The interdisciplinary nature of microalgal bioprocessing, involving biology, engineering and environmental science, underscores its significance as a frontier in the quest for sustainable solutions to global challenges.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Rezic, Tonic, Damir Oros, Iva Markovic and Daniel Kracher, et al. "Integrated hydrolyzation and fermentation of sugar beet pulp to bioethanol."J Microbiol Biotechnol 23 (2013): 1244-1252.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Marzo, Cristina, Ana Belén Díaz, Ildefonso Caro and Ana Blandino. "Effect of several pretreatments on the lactic acid production from exhausted sugar beet pulp."Foods10 (2021): 2414.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Chen, Chun-Yen, Chienyan Hsieh, Duu-Jong Lee and Chien-Hsiang Chang, et al. "Production, extraction and stabilization of lutein from microalga Chlorella sorokiniana MB-1." Bioresour Technol 200 (2016): 500-505.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Khandual, Sanghamitra, Edgar Omar Lopez Sanchez, Hugo Espinosa Andrews and Jose Daniel Padilla de la Rosa. "Phycocyanin content and nutritional profile of Arthrospira platensis from Mexico: Efficient extraction process and stability evaluation of phycocyanin." BMC Chem 15 (2021): 1-13.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Loh, Saw Hong, Mee Kee Chen, Nur Syazana Fauzi and Ahmad Aziz, et al. "Enhanced fatty acid methyl esters recovery through a simple and rapid direct transesterification of freshly harvested biomass of chlorella vulgaris and messastrum gracile." Sci Rep 11 (2021): 2720.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Woolston, Benjamin M., Steven Edgar and Gregory Stephanopoulos. "Metabolic engineering: Past and future." Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 4 (2013): 259-288.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at