Military Robots and their Impact on Modern Warfare

Dmitri Khabensky^*
*Correspondence: Dmitri Khabensky, Department of Science & Technology, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, 119049 Moscow, Russia, Email:

Introduction

In recent years, military robots have emerged as a revolutionary tool in modern warfare, bringing significant advancements to the way nations fight wars. From the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for surveillance to autonomous ground vehicles handling Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), military robots have become an integral part of military strategies across the globe. The rapid evolution of robotics, coupled with innovations in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning, has allowed armed forces to deploy highly capable robots for a range of tasks, from gathering intelligence to engaging in direct combat. While these advancements offer unparalleled efficiency, safety, and precision, they also present complex challenges related to ethics, accountability, and the potential for unintended consequences. This article will explore the multifaceted role of military robots in modern warfare, the profound impact they have on military operations, and the ethical and operational challenges they bring to the battlefield. By analyzing their applications, advantages, and potential drawbacks, this article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of military robots and their influence on the future of warfare [1].

Description

The rise of military robots has drastically altered the landscape of warfare. Their applications span a wide range of domains, from the air to the ground and even the underwater environment. Each type of robot brings specific capabilities that complement traditional military forces, while reducing the exposure of human soldiers to high-risk tasks. Whether it’s an unmanned aerial vehicle conducting a drone strike or a robotic ground vehicle clearing a minefield, military robots are reshaping military strategies worldwide. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are perhaps the most well-known and widely used military robots. Initially developed for reconnaissance, these drones have evolved to carry out a multitude of roles in modern military operations. UAVs are equipped with cameras, sensors, and even weapons, enabling them to carry out surveillance missions, provide real-time intelligence, and execute precise airstrikes on enemy targets. UAVs offer several advantages over traditional manned aircraft, primarily because they do not require human pilots, which eliminates the risk to pilots in dangerous combat zones. Furthermore, UAVs can remain airborne for extended periods, allowing military forces to conduct continuous surveillance of a target area, even over vast distances.

The use of drones has proven particularly useful in asymmetrical warfare, where military forces face non-state actors or insurgents. These robots are often deployed to target High-Value Targets (HVTs) such as militant leaders, weapons caches, or enemy infrastructure with pinpoint accuracy, minimizing collateral damage and civilian casualties. In conflicts like those in the Middle East, drones have been instrumental in gathering intelligence, identifying enemy movements, and eliminating strategic targets, making them a valuable asset in counterinsurgency operations. Another significant category of military robots is Robotic Ground Vehicles (RGVs), which are designed to operate in hazardous, hostile, or complex environments. RGVs are used for a variety of purposes, including bomb disposal, reconnaissance, and search-andrescue operations. Equipped with advanced sensors, cameras, and robotic arms, these ground robots can perform tasks that would otherwise be too dangerous for human soldiers, such as neutralizing explosive devices or navigating through contaminated areas. A notable example of a robotic ground vehicle is the "PackBot," used by the U.S. military in operations related to bomb disposal. This robot is capable of detecting and disabling explosive devices, minimizing the risk to human personnel. Similarly, the "Talon" robot is frequently deployed for EOD tasks, providing military forces with the ability to safely disable and dispose of unexploded ordnance in urban or war-torn environments. By utilizing robotic vehicles for such high-risk tasks, military forces can significantly reduce casualties among soldiers and enhance the overall safety of missions [2].

In addition to air and ground robots, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) have also gained prominence in military operations, particularly for naval forces. AUVs are used for a variety of purposes, including reconnaissance, mine detection, and gathering intelligence in underwater environments. These robots are capable of operating in depths that would be dangerous for human divers, allowing them to explore and monitor submerged areas. AUVs are often used by naval forces to detect and neutralize mines, ensure maritime security, and monitor enemy submarines or other underwater threats. They can operate autonomously or be remotely controlled, providing military personnel with invaluable intelligence and the ability to respond to underwater threats without the need for human intervention. One of the most controversial applications of military robots is the development of Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS), which are capable of selecting and engaging targets without human intervention. These systems are designed to function independently once deployed and can be integrated with UAVs or robotic ground vehicles. Autonomous weapon systems raise a host of ethical concerns, particularly regarding their potential to make life-and-death decisions without human oversight. The possibility of these systems mistakenly targeting civilians or committing acts of violence without accountability has sparked intense debate within the international community.

The ethical dilemma surrounding autonomous weapons centers on the issue of accountability. If a robot makes a decision to engage a target and inadvertently causes harm to innocent civilians, who should be held responsible? Is it the developer of the robot, the military officer who deployed it, or the robot itself? Such questions remain unresolved and are at the heart of ongoing discussions about the future of military robots. Despite these concerns, the use of military robots offers several undeniable benefits, which have driven their widespread adoption. One of the most significant advantages is the safety of human soldiers. By deploying robots to perform high-risk tasks such as bomb disposal, reconnaissance in hostile environments, or performing surveillance in dangerous areas, military forces can reduce the number of casualties among personnel. Robots are capable of entering areas contaminated by hazardous materials, operating in regions affected by biological or chemical warfare, and neutralizing threats without putting soldiers at risk. Additionally, military robots improve operational efficiency. Unlike human soldiers, robots can operate continuously without the need for rest, food, or sleep. This ability allows robots to conduct surveillance, gather intelligence, and perform reconnaissance for extended periods without the logistical limitations that human soldiers face. As a result, military forces can maintain a continuous presence in areas of interest, making operations more effective and providing real-time information to decision-makers [3].

The precision offered by military robots is another major advantage. UAVs equipped with advanced targeting systems are capable of executing precise airstrikes, reducing the likelihood of collateral damage and civilian casualties. The ability to identify and eliminate specific targets with minimal impact on surrounding infrastructure is particularly valuable in contemporary warfare, where the line between combatants and non-combatants is often blurred. The use of robots for such targeted operations ensures that military actions are more measured and less disruptive, adhering to international law and humanitarian principles. Furthermore, the integration of robots into military operations can contribute to cost savings. Although the initial cost of developing and deploying military robots can be significant, they can ultimately reduce the need for human personnel, decrease the number of casualties, and lower long-term operational costs. Robots can perform repetitive tasks, such as surveillance or patrols, without the need for human intervention, thereby reducing the resources required for these operations. Additionally, robots can perform multiple tasks simultaneously, further increasing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of military operations. Despite the numerous advantages that military robots offer, they also come with inherent challenges and risks. One of the primary concerns is the potential for escalation. The use of robots in warfare, particularly autonomous weapon systems, may lower the perceived cost of war and make it easier for nations to resort to violence. When robots can conduct operations without putting human lives at risk, military leaders may be more inclined to use force as a first option, potentially leading to increased frequency and intensity of conflicts. This “robotic warfare” dynamic could create a dangerous precedent where robots are seen as tools for quick and decisive military action, rather than as a last resort.

Another significant challenge is the issue of cybersecurity. As military robots become more autonomous and integrated into complex systems, they become increasingly vulnerable to hacking and cyberattacks. A rogue actor could potentially take control of a robot, turning it against its operators or using it for malicious purposes. The possibility of cyberattacks on military robots raises concerns about the reliability and security of these systems, particularly in high-stakes combat scenarios where failure could have catastrophic consequences. Moreover, the use of autonomous weapon systems in warfare raises critical ethical questions about accountability. If a robot is responsible for a civilian casualty or an unlawful act of violence, determining who is at fault—whether it be the developers, military commanders, or the system itself—becomes a complex legal and moral issue. As autonomous systems take on a more prominent role in warfare, international agreements and regulations will be needed to ensure that these robots are used responsibly, without violating human rights or international law [4,5].

Conclusion

Military robots are an integral part of modern warfare, offering numerous advantages, such as increased safety, precision, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. From drones and robotic ground vehicles to autonomous underwater vehicles and autonomous weapons systems, these technologies have become vital tools for military forces around the world. While military robots offer significant operational benefits, they also present complex ethical, strategic, and security challenges. The risk of escalation, the question of accountability, and the vulnerability of these robots to cyberattacks are all important considerations that must be addressed as the technology continues to evolve. The future of military robots will likely see even more advanced systems capable of performing a wider range of tasks with greater autonomy. As these systems become more integrated into military operations, it is crucial that international regulations, ethical guidelines, and oversight mechanisms are developed to ensure that they are used responsibly and in compliance with humanitarian principles. The impact of military robots on warfare is undeniable, and as technology continues to advance, the role of robots in armed conflict will only increase, shaping the future of military operations. As we move forward, it will be essential to balance the advantages of these systems with the need to uphold ethical standards and preserve the safety and security of all people involved.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Molloy, Joseph M., Timothy L. Pendergrass, Ian E. Lee and Michelle C. Chervak, et al. "Musculoskeletal injuries and United States Army readiness part I: overview of injuries and their strategic impact." Milit Med 185 (2020): e1461-e1471.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at`

2. Rhon, Daniel I., John J. Fraser, Jeff Sorensen and Tina A. Greenlee, et al. "Delayed rehabilitation is associated with recurrence and higher medical care use after ankle sprain injuries in the United States military health system." J Orth Spo Phy Ther 51 (2021): 619-627.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Sarker, Iqbal H. "AI-based modeling: Techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems." SN Comput 3 (2022): 158.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Johnson, V. H. "Battery performance models in ADVISOR." J Power Sources 110 (2002): 321-329.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Hartigan, Clare, Casey Kandilakis, Skyler Dalley and Mike Clausen, et al. "Mobility outcomes following five training sessions with a powered exoskeleton." Spinal Cord Rehab 21 (2015): 93-99.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at