Modeling Human Behavior in Pandemic Crowding: Adaptive Learning in Agent-based Models

Manisha Nilam^*
*Correspondence: Manisha Nilam, Department of Public Health, Saveetha University, Chennai 605102, India, Email:

Keywords

Agent-based models • Adaptive learning • Human behaviour • Pandemic crowding

Introduction

The intersection of human behavior and pandemic conditions within crowded spaces presents a unique and challenging domain for study. As global urbanization continues to rise, understanding how individuals adapt and respond to crowded environments during pandemics becomes increasingly crucial. This study introduces a novel perspective by incorporating adaptive learning mechanisms into agent-based models, offering a dynamic and realistic representation of how human behavior evolves in response to changing pandemic conditions within crowded settings. Pandemics, such as the recent global events involving infectious diseases, accentuate the significance of unravelling the intricacies of human behaviour in crowded spaces. The traditional paradigms of understanding crowd dynamics during pandemics often fall short of capturing the adaptive nature of human decisionmaking. This research posits that integrating adaptive learning into agentbased models provides a more accurate reflection of the dynamic interplay between individual behaviours and the evolving nature of pandemics in crowded environments [1,2].

Literature Review

The literature surrounding human behavior in pandemics and crowded settings reveals a critical gap in understanding the adaptive learning processes that influence decision-making. Previous studies have primarily focused on static models or theoretical frameworks, neglecting the dynamic nature of human responses to evolving pandemic conditions. Agent-based models, while offering a promising avenue, have often lacked the sophistication of adaptive learning mechanisms. Adaptive learning, rooted in behavioural psychology and artificial intelligence, is gaining recognition for its ability to model how individuals modify their behavior based on experience and changing circumstances [3]. In the context of pandemics and crowded spaces, the literature suggests that incorporating adaptive learning into agent-based models can provide a more nuanced understanding of how interventions, communication strategies and environmental factors influence human decision-making. As we embark on this exploration of modelling human behavior in pandemic crowding, the literature review highlights the potential of adaptive learning in elucidating the complexities of individual and collective responses. By synthesizing insights from behavioural science and computational modelling, this study aims to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how adaptive learning shapes human behavior in crowded environments during pandemics [4].

Discussion

The exploration into modeling human behavior in pandemic crowding, with a specific emphasis on adaptive learning in agent-based models, reveals profound insights into the dynamic interplay between individuals and crowded environments during public health crises. The discussion traverses the implications of adaptive learning on decision-making, the relevance of agentbased models in capturing real-world complexity and the potential applications of these findings in devising effective interventions during pandemics. One key aspect of the discussion centers on the transformative role of adaptive learning in simulating nuanced human responses. Traditional models often rely on fixed parameters, but the introduction of adaptive learning mechanisms in agent-based models allows for a more realistic representation of how individuals dynamically adjust their behavior based on evolving information and experiences. This adaptive approach captures the inherent uncertainty and changing nature of pandemics, providing a more robust foundation for predicting and managing crowd dynamics [5].

The adaptability of individuals in response to crowded environments during pandemics is a central theme. The discussion elucidates that adaptive learning not only influences individual decision-making but also contributes to the emergence of collective behaviors. Understanding how adaptive learning spreads through populations and shapes group dynamics is vital for formulating effective public health interventions, ranging from communication strategies to crowd control measures. Furthermore, the discussion delves into the role of technology and communication in influencing adaptive learning. With the ubiquity of information dissemination channels, individuals adapt their behaviors based on real-time updates and evolving risk perceptions. Agent-based models incorporating adaptive learning mechanisms serve as a valuable tool in unraveling the intricate feedback loops between technology, communication and human decision-making in crowded pandemic scenarios [6].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of adaptive learning into agent-based models proves to be a pivotal advancement in modeling human behavior in pandemic crowding. This research contributes to the evolving landscape of pandemic preparedness and response by offering a more dynamic and realistic representation of human decision-making in crowded environments. The adaptive nature of individuals, influenced by a myriad of factors, underscores the need for flexible and responsive interventions during pandemics. The findings of this study hold promise for informing policy and public health measures tailored to the intricacies of human behavior. By acknowledging the adaptive learning processes at play, authorities can design more effective communication strategies, crowd management protocols and interventions that resonate with the evolving perceptions and responses of individuals during pandemics. As we confront ongoing and future public health challenges, the insights gleaned from this research underscore the importance of considering the dynamic nature of human behavior in pandemic crowding for the development of resilient and adaptive public health strategies.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Brooks-Pollock, Ellen, Hannah Christensen, Adam Trickey and Gibran Hemani, et al. "High COVID-19 transmission potential associated with re-opening universities can be mitigated with layered interventions." Nat Commun 12 (2021): 5017.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Feng, Shihui and Alec Kirkley. "Integrating online and offline data for crisis management: Online geolocalized emotion, policy response and local mobility during the COVID crisis." Sci Rep 11 (2021): 8514.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Changruenngam, Suttikiat, Dominique J. Bicout and Charin Modchang. "How the individual human mobility spatio-temporally shapes the disease transmission dynamics." Sci Rep 10 (2020): 11325.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Bavel, Jay J. Van, Katherine Baicker, Paulo S. Boggio and Valerio Capraro, et al. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response." Nat Hum Behav 4 (2020): 460-471.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Talic, Stella, Shivangi Shah, Holly Wild and Danijela Gasevic, et al. "Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission and covid-19 mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis." BMJ 375 (2021).

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Glass, Robert J., Laura M. Glass, Walter E. Beyeler and H. Jason Min. "Targeted social distancing designs for pandemic influenza." Emerg Infect Dis 12 (2006): 1671.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at