GET THE APP

Modern Forensic Toxicology Methods
..

Journal of Forensic Medicine

ISSN: 2472-1026

Open Access

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 7, Issue 6

Modern Forensic Toxicology Methods

Goyal Ananya*
*Correspondence: Goyal Ananya, Department of Forensic Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, India, Email:
Department of Forensic Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, India

Received: 05-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. JFM-22-86486; Editor assigned: 07-Nov-2022, Pre QC No. P-86486; Reviewed: 19-Nov-2022, QC No. Q-86486; Revised: 24-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. R-86486; Published: 30-Nov-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2472-1026.2022.7.186
Citation: Ananya, Goyal. “Modern Forensic Toxicology Methods.” J Forensic Med 7 (2022): 186.
Copyright: © 2022 Ananya G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Fingerprint evidence recovery from gunshot casings presents considerable challenges for forensic researchers. While both fired and unfired casings are frequently discovered at the scene of violent crimes, recovering fingermarks and establishing a link between the perpetrator and the gun has consistently proven to be difficult due to the states that the projectile housings can reach during shooting and the techniques used to create and capture the fingermarks.

Keywords

Forensic science • Techniques • Toxicology

Introduction

Researchers have developed a new method that gives greater subtlety and precision than traditional forensic techniques for retrieving high resolution images of fingermarks from bent objects like bullet casings.

Professors from the Biomedical Forensic Sciences programme at Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) discuss test preparation procedures and provide information on common sample types that may be used in legal toxicology cases in a paper published in WIRES Forensic Science.

Description

When a bullet is shot, the packaging at the casing point is exposed to extremely high temperatures, pressures, and erosive forces inside the barrel of the firearm. The deposits of charge and powder that are used to produce the reaction that propels the bullet out of the chamber might also cover them. The more unexpected components of fingermark development, such as water, amino acids, and low sub-atomic weight organics like lipids, are frequently expelled, dispersed, or corrupted as a result of these combined effects, along with a possible smudging or clouding of the imprint. These factors can make it challenging for common fingermark recovery procedures, such as fluorescent staining and cyanoacrylate smouldering, to do their tasks.

The same way that instrumentation has improved over time, sample arranging tools have too. The unwanted components in the organic sample can be kept on a solid surface formed of common materials like silica or diatomaceous earth using solid phase and, more recently, supported liquid extraction. These extraction tools can produce pure concentrates containing the targeted drugs and help in the recovery of a wide range of drugs, enhancing research facility efficiency when handling poly-drug cases [1-5].

Conclusion

Pictures made with ToF-SIMS were shown to demonstrate grating edge and sweat pore level detail on instances where fingermarks were not obvious when made using a conventional technique using cyanoacrylate and the colour Basic Yellow 40. Seven months of testing were done to see how fingermarks left on the Webley MkII pistol's outer layer changed over time. Additionally, the ToF-SIMS approach is not terrible, and tests that were repeatedly run under UHV settings showed no evidence of image degradation during this time.

References

  1. Hall, W, and Degenhardt L. “Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use.” Lancet, 374(2009):1383-1391.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Volkow, ND, Swanson JM, Evins AE, and DeLisi LE, et al. “Effects of cannabis use on human behavior, including cognition, motivation, and psychosis: a review.” JAMA Psychiatry, 73(2016):292-297.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Amato, L, Minozzi S, Mitrova Z, and Parmelli E, et al. “Systematic review of safeness and therapeutic efficacy of cannabis in patients with multiple sclerosis, neuropathic pain, and in oncological patients treated with chemotherapy.” Epidemiol Preven, 41(2017):279-293.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Castaneto, MS, Gorelick DA, Desrosiers NA, and Hartman RL, et al. “Synthetic cannabinoids: epidemiology, pharmacodynamics, and clinical implications.” Drug Alcohol Depend, 144(2014):12-41.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Winstock, A, Lynskey M, Borschmann R, and Waldron J. “Risk of emergency medical treatment following consumption of cannabis or synthetic cannabinoids in a large global sample.” Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(2015):698-703.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

arrow_upward arrow_upward