Molecular and Chemical Physics Using Quantum-Classical Mechanics as an Alternative to Quantum Mechanics

Leighton Jeffrey^*
*Correspondence: Leighton Jeffrey, Department of Mathematics, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran, Email:

INTRODUCTION

Quantum mechanics is one of the primary, if not the main, parts of present day hypothetical physical science. In the twentieth hundred years, nuclear physical science, atomic physical science, and strong state physical science in light of quantum mechanics made a principal reason for late and present day mechanical advancement. Consequently, even in a wide logical climate, the potential outcomes of quantum mechanics are viewed as practically boundless. The appropriateness of quantum mechanics reaches out, for instance, to the whole universe (see and, surprisingly, the human mind and related cognizance. "Quantum" is truly in vogue in present day science. So, in the wide academic local area, there is an extremely well known view that quantum mechanics is the last and extreme word about the quintessence of nature. The ongoing paper examines the constraints of the relevance of quantum mechanics in light of an examination of the inward inconsistencies that emerge when it is applied fair-minded to many issues in sub-atomic and synthetic material science [1].

Description

Just a draft of the issue is illustrated in the presentation. Later segments will remember a nitty gritty conversation for both the subjective and quantitative levels. This part presents the primary application results concerning the new methodology proposed by the creator in principle. This show contrasts from the for the most part acknowledged style, in which the hypothesis is first introduced and afterward its applications to the trial are illustrated. This is on the grounds that most new outcomes have previously been distributed meetings. This article depends on distributions and reports showing the progress of the new hypothesis in applications to the examination to examine the new issue, that has emerged in physical science, at a more profound actual level and give a normal work of the hypothesis in rudimentary electron moves in dense matter. There are two fundamental purposes behind working on this issue. The first includes approximating the electron's Green's capability by it on account of a free electron. The second is connected with thinking about simply nonneighborhood vibrations of cores and ignoring their nearby vibrations [2].

Another hypothetical way to deal with investigation of atomic quantum advances and rudimentary electron moves in consolidated matter can be credited as needs be to sub-atomic and synthetic physical science. We call this new methodology in principle dozy-tumult mechanics, or in another way, quantum-traditional mechanics. The presentation of quantum-traditional (dozyturmoil) mechanics into sub-atomic and compound physical science has a constrained person and is related with the end of a fundamental peculiarity in the probabilities per unit time, or at the end of the day, in the rate constants of quantum changes in sub-atomic frameworks. This peculiarity emerges in quantum mechanics when it goes past the adiabatic guess and follows from the uniqueness of the majority of the electron (electrons) and cores and their joint movement during the time spent atomic quantum advances [3,4].

This article centers around the normal composition of dozy-turmoil mechanics or quantum-traditional mechanics of rudimentary electron moves in dense matter, which are the least difficult instances of atomic quantum advances. For the hypothetical portrayal of sub-atomic quantum changes, quantum-old style mechanics emerges in atomic and synthetic physical science rather than quantum mechanics as an outcome of a basic assessment of the Franck-Condon standard, commonly known and famous in optical atomic spectroscopy, which was presented in optical spectroscopy as an outside expansion to quantum mechanics very nearly quite a while back. Quantum-old style mechanics permits, for instance, doing a hypothetical assessment of the states of optical groups in polymethine colors and their totals, which must be made sense of in the event that the Franck-Condon rule is deserted on a basic level. As per the contentions given in this article, the Franck-Condon standard remaining parts to date an unconfirmed speculation, regardless of its fruitful application to make sense of a significant number of exploratory realities. The elements of the sub-atomic quantum progress, which is given by the Franck- Condon rule, doesn't face analysis based on broad actual contemplations [5].

Conclusion

The super basic situation is the way that up to the present, in the system of quantum mechanics, there is no particular quantitative answer for the issue of the elements of the sub-atomic transient state, in some measure in a few least complex cases, which would affirm the Franck-Condon guideline as well as the Franck-Condon elements of the transient state. Besides, the investigation of the elements of the sub-atomic transient state has an actual importance just while going past the Born-Oppenheimer adiabatic estimation, since in this guess, the undeniable powerful job of the electronic subsystem is missing, and the job of the electronic subsystem is decreased exclusively to the development of the adiabatic potential where the cores move. Be that as it may, as shown by the creator in the case of another hypothesis of rudimentary electron moves in consolidated matter, going past the adiabatic estimation prompts a peculiarity in the rate constants of "quantum" changes which concurs with the overall subjective actual contemplations. At a subjective level, a striking actual exhibition of this peculiarity.

References

1. Blutner, Reinhard, Emmanuel M. Pothos and Peter Bruza. "A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness." Top Cogn Sci 5 (2013): 711-736.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Hameroff, Stuart R. "The brain is both neurocomputer and quantum computer." Cogn Sci 31 (2007): 1035-1045.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Koch, Christof and Klaus Hepp. "Quantum mechanics in the brain." Nature 440 (2006): 611-611.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ord, G. N., and J. A. Gualtieri. "The Feynman propagator from a single path." Phy rev lett 89 (2002): 250403.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Anderson, John R., Daniel Bothell, Michael D. Byrne and Scott Douglass. "An integrated theory of the mind." Psychol rev 111 (2004): 1036.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at