Commentary - (2024) Volume 15, Issue 4
Received: 01-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. jch-24-143568;
Editor assigned: 03-Jul-2024, Pre QC No. P-143568;
Reviewed: 15-Jul-2024, QC No. Q-143568;
Revised: 22-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. R-143568;
Published:
29-Jul-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2157-7099.2024.15.756
Citation: Adrian, Nathan. “Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Resistance of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells to Chemotherapy.” J Cytol Histol 15 (2024): 756.
Copyright: © 2024 Adrian N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a clonal disorder marked by the accumulation of immature myeloid cells, leading to bone marrow failure and impaired hematopoiesis. Standard chemotherapy regimens, including anthracyclines and cytarabine, have improved patient outcomes; however, resistance to these treatments remains a major challenge. This article explores the various molecular mechanisms that contribute to the resistance of AML cells to chemotherapy, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding that could inform future therapeutic approaches [1].
Drug efflux mechanisms
One of the primary mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance in AML involves the enhanced efflux of drugs from cancer cells, mediated by Atp-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporters. Among these, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 1 (MRP1) are most studied [2].
P-glycoprotein (P-gp): Overexpression of P-gp, encoded by the MDR1 gene, leads to reduced intracellular concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents, thereby decreasing their efficacy. Studies have shown that P-gp is often upregulated in refractory AML cases and its expression correlates with poor prognosis [3].
MRP1: Similar to P-gp, MRP1 can transport a wide range of chemotherapeutic drugs out of AML cells. The overexpression of MRP1 has been associated with resistance to anthracyclines and other agents used in AML treatment.
Alterations in cell cycle regulation
Chemotherapy targets rapidly dividing cells by interfering with DNA replication and mitosis. However, AML cells can develop resistance through alterations in cell cycle regulation.
Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs): Dysregulation of CDKs and their inhibitors can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and resistance to cell cycle-specific chemotherapeutic agents. Inhibitors of CDKs, such as palbociclib, have shown potential in overcoming this resistance.
Checkpoint kinases: AML cells often exhibit mutations or overexpression of checkpoint kinases like Chk1 and Chk2, which can confer resistance by allowing cells to repair DNA damage induced by chemotherapy.
Evasion of apoptosis
Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a crucial mechanism by which chemotherapy induces cancer cell death. AML cells can evade apoptosis through several mechanisms :
Bcl-2 Family proteins: Overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins like Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 is commonly observed in AML. These proteins inhibit the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, leading to resistance. Bcl-2 inhibitors such as venetoclax have shown promise in overcoming this resistance.
p53 Mutations: The tumor suppressor p53 plays a critical role in inducing apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Mutations in the TP53 gene, leading to loss of p53 function, are associated with resistance to chemotherapy in AML.
Role of the tumor microenvironment
The bone marrow microenvironment plays a significant role in mediating chemotherapy resistance in AML. Interactions between AML cells and the stromal cells in the bone marrow niche can provide protective signals that enhance survival and drug resistance.
Cytokines and growth factors: The secretion of cytokines and growth factors like Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) can activate pro-survival signaling pathways in AML cells, contributing to resistance.
Hypoxia: The hypoxic conditions within the bone marrow microenvironment can induce the expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs), which promote cell survival and resistance to chemotherapy [4].
Targeted therapeutic approaches
To overcome chemotherapy resistance in AML, targeted therapeutic approaches are being developed. These include:
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): Targeting specific mutations in FLT3 and KIT kinases has shown efficacy in overcoming resistance and improving outcomes in AML patients.
Epigenetic modifiers: Drugs targeting epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (e.g., azacitidine) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., vorinostat), can reverse resistance mechanisms and enhance chemotherapy efficacy.
Immunotherapy: Emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, including Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, hold promise in targeting resistant AML cells by harnessing the patient's immune system.
The resistance of AML cells to chemotherapy is a multifactorial process involving drug efflux, alterations in drug metabolism, enhanced DNA repair, evasion of apoptosis, microenvironmental influences and epigenetic modifications. A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is essential for the development of novel therapeutic approaches aimed at overcoming resistance and improving outcomes for patients with AML [5].
Chemotherapy resistance in AML is a multifaceted problem involving various molecular mechanisms, including drug efflux, cell cycle alterations, apoptosis evasion and the tumor microenvironment. A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is essential for developing effective therapeutic strategies. Advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapy offer hope for overcoming resistance and improving patient outcomes in AML. Continued research and clinical trials are needed to validate these approaches and integrate them into standard treatment protocols for AML.
None.
There are no conflicts of interest by author.
Journal of Cytology & Histology received 2334 citations as per Google Scholar report