GET THE APP

Nanomaterials as a Superior Immobilization Layer in Biosensor Architecture
..

Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research

ISSN: 2572-0813

Open Access

Brief Report - (2024) Volume 9, Issue 4

Nanomaterials as a Superior Immobilization Layer in Biosensor Architecture

Horo Banerjee*
*Correspondence: Horo Banerjee, Department of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh (AUUP), Sector 125, Noida 201313, India, Email:
Department of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh (AUUP), Sector 125, Noida 201313, India

Received: 04-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. jncr-24-147557; Editor assigned: 06-Jul-2024, Pre QC No. P-147557; Reviewed: 18-Jul-2024, QC No. Q-147557; Revised: 23-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. R-147557; Published: 30-Jul-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2572-0813.2024.9.244
Citation: Banerjee, Horo. “Nanomaterials as a Superior Immobilization Layer in Biosensor Architecture.” J Nanosci Curr Res 9 (2024): 244.
Copyright: © 2024 Banerjee H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

In the realm of biosensor technology, the immobilization layer plays a critical role in determining the sensitivity, stability and overall performance of the sensor. Traditionally, materials such as polymers and glass have been employed for this purpose. However, recent advancements in nanotechnology have introduced a new class of materials-nanomaterials-that are revolutionizing biosensor architecture. These materials, with their unique properties at the nanoscale, offer significant advantages over conventional immobilization layers. Nanomaterials are substances with at least one dimension sized between 1 and 100 nanometers. This size range imparts unique optical, electrical and chemical properties not observed in their bulk counterparts. Common types of nanomaterials include nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanowires and nanorods. Due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, nanomaterials can offer enhanced interactions with biological molecules, making them ideal candidates for use in biosensors [1].

Nanomaterials possess an exceptionally high surface area relative to their volume. This increased surface area allows for a higher density of bioreceptors to be immobilized, which can improve the biosensor's sensitivity by providing more active sites for target molecules to bind. The unique electronic and optical properties of nanomaterials, such as their ability to exhibit Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or quantum confinement effects, can enhance the signal transduction mechanisms in biosensors. For example, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can amplify optical signals through SPR, leading to lower detection limits and improved sensitivity. Nanomaterials can be easily functionalized with various chemical groups, which facilitates the specific attachment of biomolecules like enzymes, antibodies, or nucleic acids. This customization ensures that the biosensor can be tailored to detect specific analytes with high precision [2].

Description

Nanomaterials can offer improved chemical and thermal stability compared to traditional immobilization layers. For instance, Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene have shown exceptional stability under harsh conditions, which enhances the longevity and reliability of the biosensor. Due to their high surface area and efficient electron transfer capabilities, nanomaterials can enable faster interactions between the biosensor's components and the target analytes. This results in quicker response times, which is crucial for realtime monitoring applications. Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been used extensively in biosensors for their SPR properties, which can be leveraged for colorimetric detection methods. For example, AuNPs functionalized with antibodies have been employed in the detection of cancer biomarkers with high sensitivity. Graphene Oxide (GO) has been utilized in electrochemical biosensors due to its excellent electrical conductivity and biocompatibility. GObased biosensors have demonstrated improved sensitivity in the detection of glucose and other metabolites [3].

CNTs have been integrated into electrochemical biosensors to enhance electron transfer rates. This integration has led to highly sensitive detection of neurotransmitters and environmental pollutants. The production and functionalization of nanomaterials can be costly and complex. Scaling these processes for mass production of biosensors remains a significant challenge. The biocompatibility of nanomaterials must be thoroughly evaluated, as some nanomaterials may exhibit cytotoxic effects. Ensuring that nanomaterials do not adversely affect biological systems is crucial for their widespread adoption. There is a need for standardized protocols for the use of nanomaterials in biosensors to ensure consistent performance and reproducibility across different applications [4].

Nanomaterials represent a transformative development in the field of biosensor technology. Their unique properties, such as high surface area, enhanced sensitivity and improved stability, make them a superior choice for immobilization layers compared to traditional materials. As research progresses and challenges are addressed, nanomaterials are poised to play an increasingly central role in the advancement of biosensor technology, opening new avenues for applications in medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring and beyond. The future of biosensing promises to be brighter with the continued integration of nanomaterials into sensor architectures.

Wearable biosensors equipped with nanomaterials are on the rise. These sensors can be embedded into clothing, skin patches, or other wearable devices to continuously monitor physiological parameters such as glucose levels, sweat composition, or vital signs. The use of nanomaterials in these devices enhances their sensitivity and allows for real-time data collection with minimal invasiveness. For instance, graphene-based sensors are being developed for wearable glucose monitors that offer high accuracy and comfort. Personalized medicine is becoming increasingly important as treatments are tailored to individual genetic profiles and health conditions. Nanomaterialbased biosensors are instrumental in this field by enabling the detection of specific biomarkers linked to various diseases. For example, researchers are developing nanomaterial-based sensors that can detect cancer-specific biomarkers at very low concentrations, facilitating early diagnosis and targeted therapy [5].

Conclusion

Nanomaterials are redefining the landscape of biosensor technology by providing superior immobilization layers that enhance sensitivity, stability and functionality. Their unique properties at the nanoscale enable innovations in various applications, from medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring to wearable technology and personalized medicine. As research continues to address challenges related to cost, biocompatibility and scalability, the integration of nanomaterials into biosensor architectures will likely lead to groundbreaking advancements and new opportunities. The future of biosensing is poised for transformation with the continued evolution of nanomaterials. By leveraging their extraordinary properties and addressing the associated challenges, researchers and engineers can develop nextgeneration biosensors that offer unprecedented performance and capabilities, paving the way for more accurate diagnostics, real-time monitoring and enhanced quality of life.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Wang, Hailiang and Hongjie Dai. "Strongly coupled inorganic–nano-carbon hybrid materials for energy storage."Chem Soc Rev 42 (2013): 3088-3113.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Baughman, Ray H., Anvar A. Zakhidov and Walt A. De Heer. "Carbon nanotubes-the route toward applications."SCI 297 (2002): 787-792.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Cao, Qing, Shu-jen Han, George S. Tulevski and Yu Zhu, et al. “Arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes with full surface coverage for high-performance electronics."Nanotechnol 8 (2013): 180-186.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Culha, Mustafa, David L. Stokes, Guy D. Griffin and Tuan Vo-Dinh. "Application of a miniature biochip using the molecular beacon probe in breast cancer gene BRCA1 detection." Biosens Bioelectron 19 (2004): 1007-1012.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Ferlay, Jacques, Murielle Colombet, Isabelle Soerjomataram and Colin Mathers, et al. "Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods."Int J Cancer Res 144 (2019): 1941-1953.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 387

Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research received 387 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward